linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
	 David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	 Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	 "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
	 Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	Jon Grimm <jon.grimm@amd.com>,
	 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	 Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: AMD SEV-SNP/Intel TDX: validation of memory pages
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 14:46:41 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALCETrUSpwsWveGPFvyQmZ1H57H4WMhnTVVqnwPX8Xi4rqHqpg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210212223918.GG365765@tassilo.jf.intel.com>

On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 2:39 PM Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> > But AFAI recursive #VE is entirely possible. The moment #VE reads that
> > ve_info thing, NMIs can happen, which can trigger another #VE which then
> > clobbers your stack and we're irrecoverably screwed again.
>
> I don't believe we have anything currently in the NMI handler that
> would trigger #VE. While some operations may need TDCALL (like MSR
> accesses) those should be all directly hooked.
>
> Also in general to avoid clobbering your stack you would just need
> to make sure to adjust the IST stack before you do anything that
> could cause another #VE.

Except that the world contains more than just #VE.  We could get #VE
and then NMI and then #VE or #VE and MCE (in a future revision?), etc.
The x86 exception situation is a mess.


  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-12 22:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-02  1:51 David Rientjes
2021-02-02 13:17 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-02-02 16:02 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-02-03  0:16   ` Brijesh Singh
2021-02-11 17:46     ` Sean Christopherson
2021-02-02 22:37 ` Andi Kleen
2021-02-11 20:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-12 13:19 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-02-12 14:17   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-12 14:53     ` Joerg Roedel
2021-02-12 15:19       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-12 15:28         ` Joerg Roedel
2021-02-12 16:12           ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-12 16:18             ` Joerg Roedel
2021-02-12 16:45               ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-12 17:48                 ` Dave Hansen
2021-02-12 18:22                   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-02-12 18:38                     ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-02-12 18:43                       ` Sean Christopherson
2021-02-12 18:46                     ` Dave Hansen
2021-02-12 19:24                       ` Sean Christopherson
2021-02-16 10:00                 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-02-16 14:27                   ` Andi Kleen
2021-02-16 14:46                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-16 15:59                       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-02-16 16:25                         ` Joerg Roedel
2021-02-16 16:48                           ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-02-16 18:26                             ` Joerg Roedel
2021-02-16 18:33                               ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-02-16 16:47                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-16 16:57                         ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-02-16 17:05                           ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-02-16 16:55                       ` Andi Kleen
2021-02-12 21:42             ` Andi Kleen
2021-02-12 21:58               ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-12 22:39                 ` Andi Kleen
2021-02-12 22:46                   ` Andy Lutomirski [this message]
2021-02-13  9:38                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-12 23:51                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-23  9:33 ` Joerg Roedel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CALCETrUSpwsWveGPFvyQmZ1H57H4WMhnTVVqnwPX8Xi4rqHqpg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jon.grimm@amd.com \
    --cc=jroedel@suse.de \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox