From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: Setting stack NUMA policy?
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 15:43:08 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALCETrUMS_Rb4Uuw1XEwULzkYYJnaFeLYOYD-7Ao_MjEBABxTw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrVsZfHqKT-+SHBq7kYx-_3Gvr=mUYUw81uvNuiMxgLWNA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> wrote:
> I'm trying to arrange for a process to have a different memory policy
> on its stack as compared to everything else (e.g. mapped libraries).
> Before I start looking for kludges, is there any clean way to do this?
>
> So far, the best I can come up with is to either parse /proc/self/maps
> on startup or to deduce the stack range from the stack pointer and
> then call mbind. Then, for added fun, I'll need to hook mmap so that
> I can mbind MAP_STACK vmas that are created for threads.
>
> This is awful. Is there something better?
>
> (What I really want is a separate policy for MAP_SHARED vs MAP_PRIVATE.)
After a bit more thought, I think that what I *really* want is for the
stack for a thread that has affinity for a single NUMA node to
automatically end up on that node. This seems like a straightforward
win if it's implementable.
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-25 23:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-25 23:35 Andy Lutomirski
2013-11-25 23:43 ` Andy Lutomirski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CALCETrUMS_Rb4Uuw1XEwULzkYYJnaFeLYOYD-7Ao_MjEBABxTw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox