From: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
To: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
Cc: alex.popov@linux.com, "Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Arve Hjønnevåg" <arve@android.com>,
"Todd Kjos" <tkjos@android.com>,
"Martijn Coenen" <maco@android.com>,
"Joel Fernandes" <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
"Christian Brauner" <christian@brauner.io>,
"Riley Andrews" <riandrews@android.com>,
driverdevel <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
"moderated list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK"
<linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Brian Starkey" <brian.starkey@arm.com>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
"Benjamin Gaignard" <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"Dmitry Vyukov" <dvyukov@google.com>,
"Andrey Konovalov" <andreyknvl@google.com>,
syzkaller <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>,
"Hridya Valsaraju" <hridya@google.com>,
"Alistair Delva" <adelva@google.com>
Subject: Re: Limits for ION Memory Allocator
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 13:23:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALAqxLU0VUp=PGx5=JuVp6c5gwLqpSZJxs7ieL631QhdzNQTyA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALAqxLU199ATrMFa2ARmHOZ3K6ZnOuDLSAqNrTfwOWJaYiW7Yg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 1:18 PM John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 12:36 PM Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 7/17/19 12:31 PM, Alexander Popov wrote:
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > The syzkaller [1] has a trouble with fuzzing the Linux kernel with ION Memory
> > > Allocator.
> > >
> > > Syzkaller uses several methods [2] to limit memory consumption of the userspace
> > > processes calling the syscalls for testing the kernel:
> > > - setrlimit(),
> > > - cgroups,
> > > - various sysctl.
> > > But these methods don't work for ION Memory Allocator, so any userspace process
> > > that has access to /dev/ion can bring the system to the out-of-memory state.
> > >
> > > An example of a program doing that:
> > >
> > >
> > > #include <sys/types.h>
> > > #include <sys/stat.h>
> > > #include <fcntl.h>
> > > #include <stdio.h>
> > > #include <linux/types.h>
> > > #include <sys/ioctl.h>
> > >
> > > #define ION_IOC_MAGIC 'I'
> > > #define ION_IOC_ALLOC _IOWR(ION_IOC_MAGIC, 0, \
> > > struct ion_allocation_data)
> > >
> > > struct ion_allocation_data {
> > > __u64 len;
> > > __u32 heap_id_mask;
> > > __u32 flags;
> > > __u32 fd;
> > > __u32 unused;
> > > };
> > >
> > > int main(void)
> > > {
> > > unsigned long i = 0;
> > > int fd = -1;
> > > struct ion_allocation_data data = {
> > > .len = 0x13f65d8c,
> > > .heap_id_mask = 1,
> > > .flags = 0,
> > > .fd = -1,
> > > .unused = 0
> > > };
> > >
> > > fd = open("/dev/ion", 0);
> > > if (fd == -1) {
> > > perror("[-] open /dev/ion");
> > > return 1;
> > > }
> > >
> > > while (1) {
> > > printf("iter %lu\n", i);
> > > ioctl(fd, ION_IOC_ALLOC, &data);
> > > i++;
> > > }
> > >
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > >
> > > I looked through the code of ion_alloc() and didn't find any limit checks.
> > > Is it currently possible to limit ION kernel allocations for some process?
> > >
> > > If not, is it a right idea to do that?
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> >
> > Yes, I do think that's the right approach. We're working on moving Ion
> > out of staging and this is something I mentioned to John Stultz. I don't
> > think we've thought too hard about how to do the actual limiting so
> > suggestions are welcome.
>
> In part the dmabuf heaps allow for separate heap devices, so we can
> have finer grained permissions to the specific heaps. But that
> doesn't provide any controls on how much memory one process could
> allocate using the device if it has permission.
>
> I suspect the same issue is present with any of the dmabuf exporters
> (gpu/display drivers, etc), so this is less of an ION/dmabuf heap
> issue and more of a dmabuf core accounting issue.
>
Also, do unmapped memfd buffers have similar accounting issues?
thanks
-john
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-24 20:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-17 16:31 Alexander Popov
2019-07-24 19:36 ` Laura Abbott
2019-07-24 20:18 ` John Stultz
2019-07-24 20:23 ` John Stultz [this message]
2019-07-26 11:45 ` Joel Fernandes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CALAqxLU0VUp=PGx5=JuVp6c5gwLqpSZJxs7ieL631QhdzNQTyA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=adelva@google.com \
--cc=alex.popov@linux.com \
--cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
--cc=arve@android.com \
--cc=benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org \
--cc=brian.starkey@arm.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=christian@brauner.io \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hridya@google.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=maco@android.com \
--cc=riandrews@android.com \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=syzkaller@googlegroups.com \
--cc=tkjos@android.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox