From: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@google.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
"bsingharora@gmail.com" <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>, Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] memcg: add vmscan_stat
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 14:00:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAL1qeaGC51POaL7PW9LK7Ke6CZt-hE8qJ3QSHu+2jaermCjuKQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110711193036.5a03858d.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 26783 bytes --]
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 3:30 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <
kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> This patch is onto mmotm-0710... got bigger than expected ;(
> ==
> [PATCH] add memory.vmscan_stat
>
> commit log of commit 0ae5e89 " memcg: count the soft_limit reclaim in..."
> says it adds scanning stats to memory.stat file. But it doesn't because
> we considered we needed to make a concensus for such new APIs.
>
> This patch is a trial to add memory.scan_stat. This shows
> - the number of scanned pages(total, anon, file)
> - the number of rotated pages(total, anon, file)
> - the number of freed pages(total, anon, file)
> - the number of elaplsed time (including sleep/pause time)
>
> for both of direct/soft reclaim.
>
> The biggest difference with oringinal Ying's one is that this file
> can be reset by some write, as
>
> # echo 0 ...../memory.scan_stat
>
> Example of output is here. This is a result after make -j 6 kernel
> under 300M limit.
>
> [kamezawa@bluextal ~]$ cat /cgroup/memory/A/memory.scan_stat
> [kamezawa@bluextal ~]$ cat /cgroup/memory/A/memory.vmscan_stat
> scanned_pages_by_limit 9471864
> scanned_anon_pages_by_limit 6640629
> scanned_file_pages_by_limit 2831235
> rotated_pages_by_limit 4243974
> rotated_anon_pages_by_limit 3971968
> rotated_file_pages_by_limit 272006
> freed_pages_by_limit 2318492
> freed_anon_pages_by_limit 962052
> freed_file_pages_by_limit 1356440
> elapsed_ns_by_limit 351386416101
> scanned_pages_by_system 0
> scanned_anon_pages_by_system 0
> scanned_file_pages_by_system 0
> rotated_pages_by_system 0
> rotated_anon_pages_by_system 0
> rotated_file_pages_by_system 0
> freed_pages_by_system 0
> freed_anon_pages_by_system 0
> freed_file_pages_by_system 0
> elapsed_ns_by_system 0
> scanned_pages_by_limit_under_hierarchy 9471864
> scanned_anon_pages_by_limit_under_hierarchy 6640629
> scanned_file_pages_by_limit_under_hierarchy 2831235
> rotated_pages_by_limit_under_hierarchy 4243974
> rotated_anon_pages_by_limit_under_hierarchy 3971968
> rotated_file_pages_by_limit_under_hierarchy 272006
> freed_pages_by_limit_under_hierarchy 2318492
> freed_anon_pages_by_limit_under_hierarchy 962052
> freed_file_pages_by_limit_under_hierarchy 1356440
> elapsed_ns_by_limit_under_hierarchy 351386416101
> scanned_pages_by_system_under_hierarchy 0
> scanned_anon_pages_by_system_under_hierarchy 0
> scanned_file_pages_by_system_under_hierarchy 0
> rotated_pages_by_system_under_hierarchy 0
> rotated_anon_pages_by_system_under_hierarchy 0
> rotated_file_pages_by_system_under_hierarchy 0
> freed_pages_by_system_under_hierarchy 0
> freed_anon_pages_by_system_under_hierarchy 0
> freed_file_pages_by_system_under_hierarchy 0
> elapsed_ns_by_system_under_hierarchy 0
>
>
> total_xxxx is for hierarchy management.
>
> This will be useful for further memcg developments and need to be
> developped before we do some complicated rework on LRU/softlimit
> management.
>
> This patch adds a new struct memcg_scanrecord into scan_control struct.
> sc->nr_scanned at el is not designed for exporting information. For
> example,
> nr_scanned is reset frequentrly and incremented +2 at scanning mapped
> pages.
>
> For avoiding complexity, I added a new param in scan_control which is for
> exporting scanning score.
>
> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
>
> Changelog:
> - renamed as vmscan_stat
> - handle file/anon
> - added "rotated"
> - changed names of param in vmscan_stat.
> ---
> Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt | 85 +++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/memcontrol.h | 19 ++++
> include/linux/swap.h | 6 -
> mm/memcontrol.c | 172
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> mm/vmscan.c | 39 +++++++-
> 5 files changed, 303 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> Index: mmotm-0710/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt
> ===================================================================
> --- mmotm-0710.orig/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt
> +++ mmotm-0710/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt
> @@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ will be charged as a new owner of it.
>
> 5.2 stat file
>
> -memory.stat file includes following statistics
> +5.2.1 memory.stat file includes following statistics
>
> # per-memory cgroup local status
> cache - # of bytes of page cache memory.
> @@ -438,6 +438,89 @@ Note:
> file_mapped is accounted only when the memory cgroup is owner of
> page
> cache.)
>
> +5.2.2 memory.vmscan_stat
> +
> +memory.vmscan_stat includes statistics information for memory scanning and
> +freeing, reclaiming. The statistics shows memory scanning information
> since
> +memory cgroup creation and can be reset to 0 by writing 0 as
> +
> + #echo 0 > ../memory.vmscan_stat
> +
> +This file contains following statistics.
> +
> +[param]_[file_or_anon]_pages_by_[reason]_[under_heararchy]
> +[param]_elapsed_ns_by_[reason]_[under_hierarchy]
> +
> +For example,
> +
> + scanned_file_pages_by_limit indicates the number of scanned
> + file pages at vmscan.
> +
> +Now, 3 parameters are supported
> +
> + scanned - the number of pages scanned by vmscan
> + rotated - the number of pages activated at vmscan
> + freed - the number of pages freed by vmscan
> +
> +If "rotated" is high against scanned/freed, the memcg seems busy.
> +
> +Now, 2 reason are supported
> +
> + limit - the memory cgroup's limit
> + system - global memory pressure + softlimit
> + (global memory pressure not under softlimit is not handled now)
> +
> +When under_hierarchy is added in the tail, the number indicates the
> +total memcg scan of its children and itself.
> +
> +elapsed_ns is a elapsed time in nanosecond. This may include sleep time
> +and not indicates CPU usage. So, please take this as just showing
> +latency.
> +
> +Here is an example.
> +
> +# cat /cgroup/memory/A/memory.vmscan_stat
> +scanned_pages_by_limit 9471864
> +scanned_anon_pages_by_limit 6640629
> +scanned_file_pages_by_limit 2831235
> +rotated_pages_by_limit 4243974
> +rotated_anon_pages_by_limit 3971968
> +rotated_file_pages_by_limit 272006
> +freed_pages_by_limit 2318492
> +freed_anon_pages_by_limit 962052
> +freed_file_pages_by_limit 1356440
> +elapsed_ns_by_limit 351386416101
> +scanned_pages_by_system 0
> +scanned_anon_pages_by_system 0
> +scanned_file_pages_by_system 0
> +rotated_pages_by_system 0
> +rotated_anon_pages_by_system 0
> +rotated_file_pages_by_system 0
> +freed_pages_by_system 0
> +freed_anon_pages_by_system 0
> +freed_file_pages_by_system 0
> +elapsed_ns_by_system 0
> +scanned_pages_by_limit_under_hierarchy 9471864
> +scanned_anon_pages_by_limit_under_hierarchy 6640629
> +scanned_file_pages_by_limit_under_hierarchy 2831235
> +rotated_pages_by_limit_under_hierarchy 4243974
> +rotated_anon_pages_by_limit_under_hierarchy 3971968
> +rotated_file_pages_by_limit_under_hierarchy 272006
> +freed_pages_by_limit_under_hierarchy 2318492
> +freed_anon_pages_by_limit_under_hierarchy 962052
> +freed_file_pages_by_limit_under_hierarchy 1356440
> +elapsed_ns_by_limit_under_hierarchy 351386416101
> +scanned_pages_by_system_under_hierarchy 0
> +scanned_anon_pages_by_system_under_hierarchy 0
> +scanned_file_pages_by_system_under_hierarchy 0
> +rotated_pages_by_system_under_hierarchy 0
> +rotated_anon_pages_by_system_under_hierarchy 0
> +rotated_file_pages_by_system_under_hierarchy 0
> +freed_pages_by_system_under_hierarchy 0
> +freed_anon_pages_by_system_under_hierarchy 0
> +freed_file_pages_by_system_under_hierarchy 0
> +elapsed_ns_by_system_under_hierarchy 0
> +
> 5.3 swappiness
>
> Similar to /proc/sys/vm/swappiness, but affecting a hierarchy of groups
> only.
> Index: mmotm-0710/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> ===================================================================
> --- mmotm-0710.orig/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> +++ mmotm-0710/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> @@ -39,6 +39,16 @@ extern unsigned long mem_cgroup_isolate_
> struct mem_cgroup *mem_cont,
> int active, int file);
>
> +struct memcg_scanrecord {
> + struct mem_cgroup *mem; /* scanend memory cgroup */
> + struct mem_cgroup *root; /* scan target hierarchy root */
> + int context; /* scanning context (see memcontrol.c) */
> + unsigned long nr_scanned[2]; /* the number of scanned pages */
> + unsigned long nr_rotated[2]; /* the number of rotated pages */
> + unsigned long nr_freed[2]; /* the number of freed pages */
> + unsigned long elapsed; /* nsec of time elapsed while scanning */
> +};
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR
> /*
> * All "charge" functions with gfp_mask should use GFP_KERNEL or
> @@ -117,6 +127,15 @@ mem_cgroup_get_reclaim_stat_from_page(st
> extern void mem_cgroup_print_oom_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> struct task_struct *p);
>
> +extern unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
> + gfp_t gfp_mask, bool
> noswap,
> + struct memcg_scanrecord
> *rec);
> +extern unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
> + gfp_t gfp_mask, bool
> noswap,
> + struct zone *zone,
> + struct memcg_scanrecord
> *rec,
> + unsigned long *nr_scanned);
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_SWAP
> extern int do_swap_account;
> #endif
> Index: mmotm-0710/include/linux/swap.h
> ===================================================================
> --- mmotm-0710.orig/include/linux/swap.h
> +++ mmotm-0710/include/linux/swap.h
> @@ -253,12 +253,6 @@ static inline void lru_cache_add_file(st
> /* linux/mm/vmscan.c */
> extern unsigned long try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist, int
> order,
> gfp_t gfp_mask, nodemask_t *mask);
> -extern unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
> - gfp_t gfp_mask, bool
> noswap);
> -extern unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
> - gfp_t gfp_mask, bool
> noswap,
> - struct zone *zone,
> - unsigned long *nr_scanned);
> extern int __isolate_lru_page(struct page *page, int mode, int file);
> extern unsigned long shrink_all_memory(unsigned long nr_pages);
> extern int vm_swappiness;
> Index: mmotm-0710/mm/memcontrol.c
> ===================================================================
> --- mmotm-0710.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ mmotm-0710/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -204,6 +204,50 @@ struct mem_cgroup_eventfd_list {
> static void mem_cgroup_threshold(struct mem_cgroup *mem);
> static void mem_cgroup_oom_notify(struct mem_cgroup *mem);
>
> +enum {
> + SCAN_BY_LIMIT,
> + SCAN_BY_SYSTEM,
> + NR_SCAN_CONTEXT,
> + SCAN_BY_SHRINK, /* not recorded now */
> +};
> +
> +enum {
> + SCAN,
> + SCAN_ANON,
> + SCAN_FILE,
> + ROTATE,
> + ROTATE_ANON,
> + ROTATE_FILE,
> + FREED,
> + FREED_ANON,
> + FREED_FILE,
> + ELAPSED,
> + NR_SCANSTATS,
> +};
> +
> +struct scanstat {
> + spinlock_t lock;
> + unsigned long stats[NR_SCAN_CONTEXT][NR_SCANSTATS];
> + unsigned long rootstats[NR_SCAN_CONTEXT][NR_SCANSTATS];
> +};
> +
> +const char *scanstat_string[NR_SCANSTATS] = {
> + "scanned_pages",
> + "scanned_anon_pages",
> + "scanned_file_pages",
> + "rotated_pages",
> + "rotated_anon_pages",
> + "rotated_file_pages",
> + "freed_pages",
> + "freed_anon_pages",
> + "freed_file_pages",
> + "elapsed_ns",
> +};
> +#define SCANSTAT_WORD_LIMIT "_by_limit"
> +#define SCANSTAT_WORD_SYSTEM "_by_system"
> +#define SCANSTAT_WORD_HIERARCHY "_under_hierarchy"
> +
> +
> /*
> * The memory controller data structure. The memory controller controls
> both
> * page cache and RSS per cgroup. We would eventually like to provide
> @@ -266,7 +310,8 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
>
> /* For oom notifier event fd */
> struct list_head oom_notify;
> -
> + /* For recording LRU-scan statistics */
> + struct scanstat scanstat;
> /*
> * Should we move charges of a task when a task is moved into this
> * mem_cgroup ? And what type of charges should we move ?
> @@ -1619,6 +1664,44 @@ bool mem_cgroup_reclaimable(struct mem_c
> }
> #endif
>
> +static void __mem_cgroup_record_scanstat(unsigned long *stats,
> + struct memcg_scanrecord *rec)
> +{
> +
> + stats[SCAN] += rec->nr_scanned[0] + rec->nr_scanned[1];
> + stats[SCAN_ANON] += rec->nr_scanned[0];
> + stats[SCAN_FILE] += rec->nr_scanned[1];
> +
> + stats[ROTATE] += rec->nr_rotated[0] + rec->nr_rotated[1];
> + stats[ROTATE_ANON] += rec->nr_rotated[0];
> + stats[ROTATE_FILE] += rec->nr_rotated[1];
> +
> + stats[FREED] += rec->nr_freed[0] + rec->nr_freed[1];
> + stats[FREED_ANON] += rec->nr_freed[0];
> + stats[FREED_FILE] += rec->nr_freed[1];
> +
> + stats[ELAPSED] += rec->elapsed;
> +}
> +
> +static void mem_cgroup_record_scanstat(struct memcg_scanrecord *rec)
> +{
> + struct mem_cgroup *mem;
> + int context = rec->context;
> +
> + if (context >= NR_SCAN_CONTEXT)
> + return;
> +
> + mem = rec->mem;
> + spin_lock(&mem->scanstat.lock);
> + __mem_cgroup_record_scanstat(mem->scanstat.stats[context], rec);
> + spin_unlock(&mem->scanstat.lock);
> +
> + mem = rec->root;
> + spin_lock(&mem->scanstat.lock);
> + __mem_cgroup_record_scanstat(mem->scanstat.rootstats[context],
> rec);
> + spin_unlock(&mem->scanstat.lock);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Scan the hierarchy if needed to reclaim memory. We remember the last
> child
> * we reclaimed from, so that we don't end up penalizing one child
> extensively
> @@ -1643,8 +1726,9 @@ static int mem_cgroup_hierarchical_recla
> bool noswap = reclaim_options & MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_NOSWAP;
> bool shrink = reclaim_options & MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_SHRINK;
> bool check_soft = reclaim_options & MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_SOFT;
> + struct memcg_scanrecord rec;
> unsigned long excess;
> - unsigned long nr_scanned;
> + unsigned long scanned;
>
> excess = res_counter_soft_limit_excess(&root_mem->res) >>
> PAGE_SHIFT;
>
> @@ -1652,6 +1736,15 @@ static int mem_cgroup_hierarchical_recla
> if (!check_soft && root_mem->memsw_is_minimum)
> noswap = true;
>
> + if (shrink)
> + rec.context = SCAN_BY_SHRINK;
> + else if (check_soft)
> + rec.context = SCAN_BY_SYSTEM;
> + else
> + rec.context = SCAN_BY_LIMIT;
> +
> + rec.root = root_mem;
> +
> while (1) {
> victim = mem_cgroup_select_victim(root_mem);
> if (victim == root_mem) {
> @@ -1692,14 +1785,23 @@ static int mem_cgroup_hierarchical_recla
> css_put(&victim->css);
> continue;
> }
> + rec.mem = victim;
> + rec.nr_scanned[0] = 0;
> + rec.nr_scanned[1] = 0;
> + rec.nr_rotated[0] = 0;
> + rec.nr_rotated[1] = 0;
> + rec.nr_freed[0] = 0;
> + rec.nr_freed[1] = 0;
> + rec.elapsed = 0;
> /* we use swappiness of local cgroup */
> if (check_soft) {
> ret = mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(victim, gfp_mask,
> - noswap, zone, &nr_scanned);
> - *total_scanned += nr_scanned;
> + noswap, zone, &rec, &scanned);
> + *total_scanned += scanned;
> } else
> ret = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(victim, gfp_mask,
> - noswap);
> + noswap, &rec);
> + mem_cgroup_record_scanstat(&rec);
> css_put(&victim->css);
> /*
> * At shrinking usage, we can't check we should stop here or
> @@ -3688,14 +3790,18 @@ try_to_free:
> /* try to free all pages in this cgroup */
> shrink = 1;
> while (nr_retries && mem->res.usage > 0) {
> + struct memcg_scanrecord rec;
> int progress;
>
> if (signal_pending(current)) {
> ret = -EINTR;
> goto out;
> }
> + rec.context = SCAN_BY_SHRINK;
> + rec.mem = mem;
> + rec.root = mem;
> progress = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(mem, GFP_KERNEL,
> - false);
> + false, &rec);
> if (!progress) {
> nr_retries--;
> /* maybe some writeback is necessary */
> @@ -4539,6 +4645,54 @@ static int mem_control_numa_stat_open(st
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
>
> +static int mem_cgroup_vmscan_stat_read(struct cgroup *cgrp,
> + struct cftype *cft,
> + struct cgroup_map_cb *cb)
> +{
> + struct mem_cgroup *mem = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cgrp);
> + char string[64];
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < NR_SCANSTATS; i++) {
> + strcpy(string, scanstat_string[i]);
> + strcat(string, SCANSTAT_WORD_LIMIT);
> + cb->fill(cb, string,
> mem->scanstat.stats[SCAN_BY_LIMIT][i]);
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < NR_SCANSTATS; i++) {
> + strcpy(string, scanstat_string[i]);
> + strcat(string, SCANSTAT_WORD_SYSTEM);
> + cb->fill(cb, string,
> mem->scanstat.stats[SCAN_BY_SYSTEM][i]);
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < NR_SCANSTATS; i++) {
> + strcpy(string, scanstat_string[i]);
> + strcat(string, SCANSTAT_WORD_LIMIT);
> + strcat(string, SCANSTAT_WORD_HIERARCHY);
> + cb->fill(cb, string,
> mem->scanstat.rootstats[SCAN_BY_LIMIT][i]);
> + }
> + for (i = 0; i < NR_SCANSTATS; i++) {
> + strcpy(string, scanstat_string[i]);
> + strcat(string, SCANSTAT_WORD_SYSTEM);
> + strcat(string, SCANSTAT_WORD_HIERARCHY);
> + cb->fill(cb, string,
> mem->scanstat.rootstats[SCAN_BY_SYSTEM][i]);
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int mem_cgroup_reset_vmscan_stat(struct cgroup *cgrp,
> + unsigned int event)
> +{
> + struct mem_cgroup *mem = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cgrp);
> +
> + spin_lock(&mem->scanstat.lock);
> + memset(&mem->scanstat.stats, 0, sizeof(mem->scanstat.stats));
> + memset(&mem->scanstat.rootstats, 0,
> sizeof(mem->scanstat.rootstats));
> + spin_unlock(&mem->scanstat.lock);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +
> static struct cftype mem_cgroup_files[] = {
> {
> .name = "usage_in_bytes",
> @@ -4609,6 +4763,11 @@ static struct cftype mem_cgroup_files[]
> .mode = S_IRUGO,
> },
> #endif
> + {
> + .name = "vmscan_stat",
> + .read_map = mem_cgroup_vmscan_stat_read,
> + .trigger = mem_cgroup_reset_vmscan_stat,
> + },
> };
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_SWAP
> @@ -4872,6 +5031,7 @@ mem_cgroup_create(struct cgroup_subsys *
> atomic_set(&mem->refcnt, 1);
> mem->move_charge_at_immigrate = 0;
> mutex_init(&mem->thresholds_lock);
> + spin_lock_init(&mem->scanstat.lock);
> return &mem->css;
> free_out:
> __mem_cgroup_free(mem);
> Index: mmotm-0710/mm/vmscan.c
> ===================================================================
> --- mmotm-0710.orig/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ mmotm-0710/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ struct scan_control {
>
> /* Which cgroup do we reclaim from */
> struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup;
> + struct memcg_scanrecord *memcg_record;
>
> /*
> * Nodemask of nodes allowed by the caller. If NULL, all nodes
> @@ -1307,6 +1308,8 @@ putback_lru_pages(struct zone *zone, str
> int file = is_file_lru(lru);
> int numpages = hpage_nr_pages(page);
> reclaim_stat->recent_rotated[file] += numpages;
> + if (!scanning_global_lru(sc))
> + sc->memcg_record->nr_rotated[file] +=
> numpages;
> }
> if (!pagevec_add(&pvec, page)) {
> spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
> @@ -1350,6 +1353,10 @@ static noinline_for_stack void update_is
>
> reclaim_stat->recent_scanned[0] += *nr_anon;
> reclaim_stat->recent_scanned[1] += *nr_file;
> + if (!scanning_global_lru(sc)) {
> + sc->memcg_record->nr_scanned[0] += *nr_anon;
> + sc->memcg_record->nr_scanned[1] += *nr_file;
> + }
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1457,6 +1464,9 @@ shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to
>
> nr_reclaimed = shrink_page_list(&page_list, zone, sc);
>
> + if (!scanning_global_lru(sc))
> + sc->memcg_record->nr_freed[file] += nr_reclaimed;
> +
>
Can't we stall for writeback? If so, we may call shrink_page_list() again
below. The accounting should probably go after that instead.
> /* Check if we should syncronously wait for writeback */
> if (should_reclaim_stall(nr_taken, nr_reclaimed, priority, sc)) {
> set_reclaim_mode(priority, sc, true);
> @@ -1562,6 +1572,8 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned
> }
>
> reclaim_stat->recent_scanned[file] += nr_taken;
> + if (!scanning_global_lru(sc))
> + sc->memcg_record->nr_scanned[file] += nr_taken;
>
> __count_zone_vm_events(PGREFILL, zone, pgscanned);
> if (file)
> @@ -1613,6 +1625,8 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned
> * get_scan_ratio.
> */
> reclaim_stat->recent_rotated[file] += nr_rotated;
> + if (!scanning_global_lru(sc))
> + sc->memcg_record->nr_rotated[file] += nr_rotated;
>
> move_active_pages_to_lru(zone, &l_active,
> LRU_ACTIVE + file *
> LRU_FILE);
> @@ -2207,9 +2221,10 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_pages(struct z
> #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR
>
> unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
> - gfp_t gfp_mask, bool
> noswap,
> - struct zone *zone,
> - unsigned long *nr_scanned)
> + gfp_t gfp_mask, bool noswap,
> + struct zone *zone,
> + struct memcg_scanrecord *rec,
> + unsigned long *scanned)
> {
> struct scan_control sc = {
> .nr_scanned = 0,
> @@ -2219,7 +2234,9 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zon
> .may_swap = !noswap,
> .order = 0,
> .mem_cgroup = mem,
> + .memcg_record = rec,
> };
> + unsigned long start, end;
>
> sc.gfp_mask = (gfp_mask & GFP_RECLAIM_MASK) |
> (GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE & ~GFP_RECLAIM_MASK);
> @@ -2228,6 +2245,7 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zon
> sc.may_writepage,
> sc.gfp_mask);
>
> + start = sched_clock();
> /*
> * NOTE: Although we can get the priority field, using it
> * here is not a good idea, since it limits the pages we can scan.
> @@ -2236,19 +2254,25 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zon
> * the priority and make it zero.
> */
> shrink_zone(0, zone, &sc);
> + end = sched_clock();
> +
> + if (rec)
> + rec->elapsed += end - start;
> + *scanned = sc.nr_scanned;
>
> trace_mm_vmscan_memcg_softlimit_reclaim_end(sc.nr_reclaimed);
>
> - *nr_scanned = sc.nr_scanned;
> return sc.nr_reclaimed;
> }
>
> unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(struct mem_cgroup *mem_cont,
> gfp_t gfp_mask,
> - bool noswap)
> + bool noswap,
> + struct memcg_scanrecord *rec)
> {
> struct zonelist *zonelist;
> unsigned long nr_reclaimed;
> + unsigned long start, end;
> int nid;
> struct scan_control sc = {
> .may_writepage = !laptop_mode,
> @@ -2257,6 +2281,7 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pag
> .nr_to_reclaim = SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX,
> .order = 0,
> .mem_cgroup = mem_cont,
> + .memcg_record = rec,
> .nodemask = NULL, /* we don't care the placement */
> .gfp_mask = (gfp_mask & GFP_RECLAIM_MASK) |
> (GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE & ~GFP_RECLAIM_MASK),
> @@ -2265,6 +2290,7 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pag
> .gfp_mask = sc.gfp_mask,
> };
>
> + start = sched_clock();
> /*
> * Unlike direct reclaim via alloc_pages(), memcg's reclaim doesn't
> * take care of from where we get pages. So the node where we start
> the
> @@ -2279,6 +2305,9 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pag
> sc.gfp_mask);
>
> nr_reclaimed = do_try_to_free_pages(zonelist, &sc, &shrink);
> + end = sched_clock();
> + if (rec)
> + rec->elapsed += end - start;
>
> trace_mm_vmscan_memcg_reclaim_end(nr_reclaimed);
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign
> http://stopthemeter.ca/
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 30247 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-18 21:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-11 10:30 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-07-12 23:02 ` Andrew Bresticker
2011-07-14 0:02 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-07-15 18:34 ` Andrew Bresticker
2011-07-15 20:28 ` Andrew Bresticker
2011-07-20 6:00 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-07-20 5:58 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-07-18 21:00 ` Andrew Bresticker [this message]
2011-07-20 6:03 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAL1qeaGC51POaL7PW9LK7Ke6CZt-hE8qJ3QSHu+2jaermCjuKQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=abrestic@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=yinghan@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox