From: Weijie Yang <weijie.yang.kh@gmail.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Weijie Yang <weijie.yang@samsung.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: page_alloc: place zone id check before VM_BUG_ON_PAGE check
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 21:38:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAL1ERfOxEJGJjZk9O_NKV82mOT+udto0tL2eCagicLig6CaJ=g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141209095922.GB21903@suse.de>
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 03:40:35PM +0800, Weijie Yang wrote:
>> If the free page and its buddy has different zone id, the current
>> zone->lock cann't prevent buddy page getting allocated, this could
>> trigger VM_BUG_ON_PAGE in a very tiny chance:
>>
>
> Under what circumstances can a buddy page be allocated without the
> zone->lock? Any parallel allocation from that zone that takes place will
> be from the per-cpu allocator and should not be affected by this. Have
> you actually hit this race?
My description maybe not clear, if the free page and its buddy is not
at the same zone, the holding zone->lock cann't prevent buddy page
getting allocated.
zone_1->lock prevents the freeing page getting allocated
zone_2->lock prevents the buddy page getting allocated
they are not the same zone->lock.
I found it when review the code, not a running test.
However, if we cann't remove the zone_id check statement, I think
we should handle this rare race.
If I miss something or make a mistake, please let me know.
Thanks
> --
> Mel Gorman
> SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-10 13:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-09 7:40 Weijie Yang
2014-12-09 9:59 ` Mel Gorman
2014-12-10 13:38 ` Weijie Yang [this message]
2014-12-10 14:03 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAL1ERfOxEJGJjZk9O_NKV82mOT+udto0tL2eCagicLig6CaJ=g@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=weijie.yang.kh@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=weijie.yang@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox