From: Weijie Yang <weijie.yang.kh@gmail.com>
To: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>,
Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Weijie Yang <weijie.yang@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/zswap: change zswap to writethrough cache
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 11:50:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAL1ERfNr+J5gT-s1Qe+RVmNz+CenNFOzAWi86MNCt2ZGLB4ZCA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <528D570D.3020006@oracle.com>
Hello Dan,
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com> wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> On 11/21/2013 03:49 AM, Dan Streetman wrote:
>> Currently, zswap is writeback cache; stored pages are not sent
>> to swap disk, and when zswap wants to evict old pages it must
>> first write them back to swap cache/disk manually. This avoids
>> swap out disk I/O up front, but only moves that disk I/O to
>> the writeback case (for pages that are evicted), and adds the
>> overhead of having to uncompress the evicted pages, and adds the
>> need for an additional free page (to store the uncompressed page)
>> at a time of likely high memory pressure. Additionally, being
>> writeback adds complexity to zswap by having to perform the
>> writeback on page eviction.
>>
>
> Good work!
>
>> This changes zswap to writethrough cache by enabling
>> frontswap_writethrough() before registering, so that any
>> successful page store will also be written to swap disk. All the
>> writeback code is removed since it is no longer needed, and the
>> only operation during a page eviction is now to remove the entry
>> from the tree and free it.
>>
Thanks for your work. I reviewed this patch, and it is good to me.
However, I am skeptical about it because:
1. it will add more IO than original zswap, how does it result in a
performance improvement ?
2. most embedded device use NAND, more IO will reduce its working life
Regards
> Could you do some testing using eg. SPECjbb? And compare the result with
> original zswap.
>
> Thanks,
> -Bob
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-21 3:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-20 19:49 Dan Streetman
2013-11-21 0:42 ` Bob Liu
2013-11-21 3:50 ` Weijie Yang [this message]
2013-11-21 23:00 ` Dan Streetman
2013-11-21 22:38 ` Dan Streetman
2013-11-22 17:29 ` Seth Jennings
2013-11-22 18:07 ` Dan Streetman
2013-11-25 18:00 ` Seth Jennings
2013-11-27 1:28 ` Dan Streetman
2013-12-11 9:02 ` Bob Liu
2013-12-13 2:58 ` Dan Streetman
2013-11-22 22:10 ` [PATCH v3] " Dan Streetman
2013-11-23 2:37 ` Weijie Yang
2013-11-23 20:35 ` Dan Streetman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAL1ERfNr+J5gT-s1Qe+RVmNz+CenNFOzAWi86MNCt2ZGLB4ZCA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=weijie.yang.kh@gmail.com \
--cc=bob.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=ddstreet@ieee.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=sjennings@variantweb.net \
--cc=weijie.yang@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox