From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_MED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F040C433E0 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:04:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F337D20644 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="qKm/Whls" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org F337D20644 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 770E96B000E; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:04:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 6F88B6B0010; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:04:47 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 599B36B0022; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:04:47 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0015.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.15]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BE9C6B000E for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:04:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin13.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5430181AD003 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:04:46 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76957472172.13.stem64_450106426e34 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin13.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B7DC18143357 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:04:31 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: stem64_450106426e34 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 5299 Received: from mail-pl1-f196.google.com (mail-pl1-f196.google.com [209.85.214.196]) by imf20.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:04:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pl1-f196.google.com with SMTP id j4so7821245plk.3 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 10:04:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=+m5221Ut6o3WuT6BjiL72c05hVwdkXllFG7aX4yJx4M=; b=qKm/WhlsQKDgGm0JFnkCdb0IzzhquY358SdW3YjXotmWgdudNMJZnXNXgvLG0UCoo9 7Cw6pnkmDWaW0NfZwL15NqU9yndpUvZfap4/r4/N0EchCfKEkHwdBZzA06x2GNQH+3Mt J/3WYO6M5B8qpkeQr8fpVlBadLhCAZf2C9poaWq+QLaHYcQ0rGyiUjvhR65Bxkj+hA2b s9+jLdjx7crDjAvCyWnbR0bBghdrf6Nltn1qYGOn5boJGAxwdb3AWa19DW56iVy38cNF K25EWlpr0J4GIzjxfrzpPzlHwPqk4eyUHRflEds57fzvbDL6gzcelUVq6RZ2ZRqHOBVq 4aaw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+m5221Ut6o3WuT6BjiL72c05hVwdkXllFG7aX4yJx4M=; b=nB0tQkbTvDgdOFuwbwztMneX5DDgB+1qhMwbbACjJz1gg0ooDtVaeHDbT5CwmEkNUZ p3Vwsjj2BsL7H9n1OQurDaH3VsESKwnMNE8h/lSgqABYvG+TBnUCi9PjzQyZYXSQV8nw IhshZNWK9a7D62ZfsOQqsJxa1lepMSGF8MM6qKyx+34tuycNMfqpuCnVqQ2tvXXvQSaD gFNhSRpEHJP500M/hu8GoofDDFb/2jcdUVVsrFG+1vyonv7y2Gxnq6CZhwCC1ZrwdvZn MVGOQrxCF8I0ARlkBiDUOYJpOXlFfo616PyCCKrBo+hz5bynMH04lNtzLii+Aj5MDhy6 iu6w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533YrxJs3OaNWG4Gu8R6GKYCv8Qcmacmi9qNXwcCkxUUz3sqQuAC w3X6bq1aSL0dsjcbckrjdakZoLnuNTpp/wMO4kqzIA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwq3U6/P+kOQWrtaPsfC7pEtXaKjHv6HeLE+nRTnxPEDc+MHw061OC9xpPpZ7i7YIPBLzcZEdJFmiD+WA1tEsk= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:e2c4:: with SMTP id fr4mr19317188pjb.32.1592845469798; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 10:04:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200620033007.1444705-1-keescook@chromium.org> <20200620033007.1444705-5-keescook@chromium.org> In-Reply-To: <20200620033007.1444705-5-keescook@chromium.org> From: Nick Desaulniers Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 10:04:18 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/16] b43: Remove uninitialized_var() usage To: Kees Cook Cc: LKML , Linus Torvalds , Miguel Ojeda , Alexander Potapenko , Joe Perches , Andy Whitcroft , "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" , drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, b43-dev@lists.infradead.org, Network Development , Linux Doc Mailing List , linux-wireless , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, Linux Memory Management List , clang-built-linux Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 7B7DC18143357 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam04 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 8:30 PM Kees Cook wrote: > > Using uninitialized_var() is dangerous as it papers over real bugs[1] > (or can in the future), and suppresses unrelated compiler warnings (e.g. > "unused variable"). If the compiler thinks it is uninitialized, either > simply initialize the variable or make compiler changes. As a precursor > to removing[2] this[3] macro[4], just initialize this variable to NULL. > No later NULL deref is possible due to the early returns outside of the > (phy->rev >= 7 && phy->rev < 19) case, which explicitly tests for NULL. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200603174714.192027-1-glider@google.com/ > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFw+Vbj0i=1TGqCR5vQkCzWJ0QxK6CernOU6eedsudAixw@mail.gmail.com/ > [3] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFwgbgqhbp1fkxvRKEpzyR5J8n1vKT1VZdz9knmPuXhOeg@mail.gmail.com/ > [4] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFz2500WfbKXAx8s67wrm9=yVJu65TpLgN_ybYNv0VEOKA@mail.gmail.com/ > > Fixes: 58619b14d106 ("b43: move under broadcom vendor directory") > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook I see three total uses of uninitialized_var() in this file, do we want to eliminate all of them? > --- > drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/phy_n.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/phy_n.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/phy_n.c > index c33b4235839d..46db91846007 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/phy_n.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/phy_n.c > @@ -4222,7 +4222,7 @@ static void b43_nphy_tx_gain_table_upload(struct b43_wldev *dev) > u32 rfpwr_offset; > u8 pga_gain, pad_gain; > int i; > - const s16 *uninitialized_var(rf_pwr_offset_table); > + const s16 *rf_pwr_offset_table = NULL; > > table = b43_nphy_get_tx_gain_table(dev); > if (!table) > -- -- Thanks, ~Nick Desaulniers