From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com [209.85.217.182]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C53016B010B for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 03:47:34 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-lb0-f182.google.com with SMTP id f15so9918078lbj.27 for ; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 00:47:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-la0-f52.google.com (mail-la0-f52.google.com. [209.85.215.52]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id tb1si31460176lbb.130.2014.11.03.00.47.33 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 03 Nov 2014 00:47:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-la0-f52.google.com with SMTP id pv20so7378442lab.11 for ; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 00:47:33 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <35FD53F367049845BC99AC72306C23D103E010D18287@CNBJMBX05.corpusers.net> References: <35FD53F367049845BC99AC72306C23D103E010D18260@CNBJMBX05.corpusers.net> <35FD53F367049845BC99AC72306C23D103E010D18261@CNBJMBX05.corpusers.net> <35FD53F367049845BC99AC72306C23D103E010D18264@CNBJMBX05.corpusers.net> <35FD53F367049845BC99AC72306C23D103E010D18265@CNBJMBX05.corpusers.net> <35FD53F367049845BC99AC72306C23D103E010D18266@CNBJMBX05.corpusers.net> <20141030120127.GC32589@arm.com> <20141030135749.GE32589@arm.com> <35FD53F367049845BC99AC72306C23D103E010D18272@CNBJMBX05.corpusers.net> <35FD53F367049845BC99AC72306C23D103E010D18274@CNBJMBX05.corpusers.net> <20141031104305.GC6731@arm.com> <35FD53F367049845BC99AC72306C23D103E010D18287@CNBJMBX05.corpusers.net> Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 09:47:32 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC V6 3/3] arm64:add bitrev.h file to support rbit instruction From: Ard Biesheuvel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: "Wang, Yalin" Cc: Will Deacon , Russell King - ARM Linux , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "akinobu.mita@gmail.com" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Joe Perches , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" On 3 November 2014 03:17, Wang, Yalin wrote: >> From: Will Deacon [mailto:will.deacon@arm.com] >> > +#ifndef __ASM_ARM64_BITREV_H >> > +#define __ASM_ARM64_BITREV_H >> >> Really minor nit, but we don't tend to include 'ARM64' in our header guards, >> so this should just be __ASM_BITREV_H. >> >> With that change, >> >> Acked-by: Will Deacon >> > I have send the patch to the patch system: > http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/search.php?uid=4025 > > 8187/1 8188/1 8189/1 > > Just remind you that , should also cherry-pick Joe Perches's > 2 patches: > [PATCH] 6fire: Convert byte_rev_table uses to bitrev8 > [PATCH] carl9170: Convert byte_rev_table uses to bitrev8 > > To make sure there is no build error when build these 2 drivers. > If this is the case, I suggest you update patch 8187/1 to retain the byte_rev_table symbol, even in the accelerated case, and remove it with a followup patch once Joe's patches have landed upstream. Also, a link to the patches would be nice, and perhaps a bit of explanation how/when they are expected to be merged. -- Ard. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org