From: "Raphael S. Carvalho" <raphaelsc@scylladb.com>
To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: djwong@kernel.org, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
hch@lst.de, Avi Kivity <avi@scylladb.com>
Subject: Possible regression with buffered writes + NOWAIT behavior, under memory pressure
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 15:12:24 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKhLTr1UL3ePTpYjXOx2AJfNk8Ku2EdcEfu+CH1sf3Asr=B-Dw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
While running scylladb test suite, which uses io_uring + buffered
writes + XFS, the system was spuriously returning ENOMEM, despite
there being plenty of available memory to be reclaimed from the page
cache. FWIW, I am running: 6.12.9-100.fc40.x86_64
Tracing showed io_uring_complete failing the request with ENOMEM:
# cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace | grep "result -12" -B 100 |
grep "0000000065b91cd1"
reactor-1-707139 [000] ..... 46737.358518:
io_uring_submit_req: ring 00000000e52339b8, req 0000000065b91cd1,
user_data 0x50f0001e4000, opcode WRITE, flags 0x200000, sq_thread 0
reactor-1-707139 [000] ..... 46737.358526: io_uring_file_get:
ring 00000000e52339b8, req 0000000065b91cd1, user_data 0x50f0001e4000,
fd 45
reactor-1-707139 [000] ...1. 46737.358560: io_uring_complete:
ring 00000000e52339b8, req 0000000065b91cd1, user_data 0x50f0001e4000,
result -12, cflags 0x0 extra1 0 extra2 0
That puzzled me.
Using retsnoop, it pointed to iomap_get_folio:
00:34:16.180612 -> 00:34:16.180651 TID/PID 253786/253721
(reactor-1/combined_tests):
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76
do_syscall_64+0x82
__do_sys_io_uring_enter+0x265
io_submit_sqes+0x209
io_issue_sqe+0x5b
io_write+0xdd
xfs_file_buffered_write+0x84
iomap_file_buffered_write+0x1a6
32us [-ENOMEM] iomap_write_begin+0x408
iter=&{.inode=0xffff8c67aa031138,.len=4096,.flags=33,.iomap={.addr=0xffffffffffffffff,.length=4096,.type=1,.flags=3,.bdev=0x…
pos=0 len=4096 foliop=0xffffb32c296b7b80
! 4us [-ENOMEM] iomap_get_folio
iter=&{.inode=0xffff8c67aa031138,.len=4096,.flags=33,.iomap={.addr=0xffffffffffffffff,.length=4096,.type=1,.flags=3,.bdev=0x…
pos=0 len=4096
Another trace shows iomap_file_buffered_write with ki_flags 2359304,
which translate into (IOCB_WRITE & IOCB_ALLOC_CACHE & IOCB_NOWAIT)
And flags 33 in iomap_get_folio means IOMAP_NOWAIT, which makes sense
since XFS translates IOCB_NOWAIT into IOMAP_NOWAIT for performing the
buffered write through iomap subsystem:
fs/iomap/buffered-io.c- if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT)
fs/iomap/buffered-io.c: iter.flags |= IOMAP_NOWAIT;
We know io_uring works by first attempting to write with IOCB_NOWAIT,
and if it fails with EAGAIN, it falls back to worker thread without
the NOWAIT semantics.
iomap_get_folio(), once called with IOMAP_NOWAIT, will request the
allocation to follow GFP_NOWAIT behavior, so allocation can
potentially fail under pressure.
Coming across 'iomap: Add async buffered write support', I see Darrick wrote:
"FGP_NOWAIT can cause __filemap_get_folio to return a NULL folio, which
makes iomap_write_begin return -ENOMEM. If nothing has been written
yet, won't that cause the ENOMEM to escape to userspace? Why do we want
that instead of EAGAIN?"
In the patch ''mm: return an ERR_PTR from __filemap_get_folio', I see
the following changes:
--- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
+++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
@@ -468,19 +468,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iomap_is_partially_uptodate);
struct folio *iomap_get_folio(struct iomap_iter *iter, loff_t pos)
{
unsigned fgp = FGP_LOCK | FGP_WRITE | FGP_CREAT | FGP_STABLE | FGP_NOFS;
- struct folio *folio;
if (iter->flags & IOMAP_NOWAIT)
fgp |= FGP_NOWAIT;
- folio = __filemap_get_folio(iter->inode->i_mapping, pos >> PAGE_SHIFT,
+ return __filemap_get_folio(iter->inode->i_mapping, pos >> PAGE_SHIFT,
fgp, mapping_gfp_mask(iter->inode->i_mapping));
- if (folio)
- return folio;
-
- if (iter->flags & IOMAP_NOWAIT)
- return ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN);
- return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
}
This leads to me believe we have a regression in this area, after that
patch, since iomap_get_folio() is no longer returning EAGAIN with
IOMAP_NOWAIT, if __filemap_get_folio() failed to get a folio. Now it
returns ENOMEM unconditionally.
Since we pushed the error picking decision to __filemap_get_folio, I
think it makes sense for us to patch it such that it returns EAGAIN if
allocation failed (under pressure) because IOMAP_NOWAIT was requested
by its caller and allocation is not allowed to block waiting for
reclaimer to do its thing.
A possible way to fix it is this one-liner, but I am not well versed
in this area, so someone may end up suggesting a better fix:
diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
index 804d7365680c..9e698a619545 100644
--- a/mm/filemap.c
+++ b/mm/filemap.c
@@ -1964,7 +1964,7 @@ struct folio *__filemap_get_folio(struct
address_space *mapping, pgoff_t index,
do {
gfp_t alloc_gfp = gfp;
- err = -ENOMEM;
+ err = (fgp_flags & FGP_NOWAIT) ? -ENOMEM : -EAGAIN;
if (order > min_order)
alloc_gfp |= __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_NOWARN;
folio = filemap_alloc_folio(alloc_gfp, order);
Am I missing something?
Regards,
Raphael
next reply other threads:[~2025-02-10 18:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-10 18:12 Raphael S. Carvalho [this message]
2025-02-10 18:20 ` Raphael S. Carvalho
2025-02-10 18:34 ` Raphael S. Carvalho
2025-02-10 21:09 ` Dave Chinner
2025-02-10 21:18 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-02-10 21:27 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAKhLTr1UL3ePTpYjXOx2AJfNk8Ku2EdcEfu+CH1sf3Asr=B-Dw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=raphaelsc@scylladb.com \
--cc=avi@scylladb.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox