From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@intel.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, mpx: Ensure unused arguments of prctl() MPX requests are 0
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 19:25:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKgNAki3Fh8N=jyPHxxFpicjyJ=0kA75SJ65QjYzPmWnvy4nsw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r3v350io.fsf@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
On 9 January 2015 at 18:25, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> From: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
>>
>> commit fe8c7f5cbf91124987106faa3bdf0c8b955c4cf7 added two new prctl()
>> operations, PR_MPX_ENABLE_MANAGEMENT and PR_MPX_DISABLE_MANAGEMENT.
>> However, no checks were included to ensure that unused arguments
>> are zero, as is done in many existing prctl()s and as should be
>> done for all new prctl()s. This patch adds the required checks.
>
> This will break the existing gcc run time, which doesn't zero these
> arguments.
I'm a little lost here. Weren't these flags new in the
as-yet-unreleased 3.19? How does gcc run-time depends on them already?
Thanks,
Michael
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/sys.c | 4 ++++
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/sys.c b/kernel/sys.c
>> index a8c9f5a..ea9c881 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sys.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sys.c
>> @@ -2210,9 +2210,13 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(prctl, int, option, unsigned long, arg2, unsigned long, arg3,
>> up_write(&me->mm->mmap_sem);
>> break;
>> case PR_MPX_ENABLE_MANAGEMENT:
>> + if (arg2 || arg3 || arg4 || arg5)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> error = MPX_ENABLE_MANAGEMENT(me);
>> break;
>> case PR_MPX_DISABLE_MANAGEMENT:
>> + if (arg2 || arg3 || arg4 || arg5)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> error = MPX_DISABLE_MANAGEMENT(me);
>> break;
>> default:
>> --
>> 1.9.3
>
> --
> ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-09 18:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-08 10:28 Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-01-09 17:25 ` Andi Kleen
2015-01-09 18:25 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) [this message]
2015-01-09 18:34 ` Dave Hansen
2015-01-10 13:49 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-01-10 18:39 ` Andi Kleen
2015-01-14 7:21 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAKgNAki3Fh8N=jyPHxxFpicjyJ=0kA75SJ65QjYzPmWnvy4nsw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=qiaowei.ren@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox