From: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
To: Takero Funaki <flintglass@gmail.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>,
Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@linux.dev>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: zswap: limit number of zpools based on CPU and RAM
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 10:26:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKEwX=PBcxsCK+qRvsPLRnDobttzm75YuS6Js7Y4R1MKSf_RxQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240606165303.431215-1-flintglass@gmail.com>
On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 5:53 PM Takero Funaki <flintglass@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This patch limits the number of zpools used by zswap on smaller systems.
>
> Currently, zswap allocates 32 pools unconditionally. This was
> implemented to reduce contention on per-zpool locks. However, it incurs
> allocation overhead by distributing pages across pools, wasting memory
> on systems with fewer CPUs and less RAM.
>
> This patch allocates approximately 2*CPU zpools, with a minimum of 1
> zpool for single-CPU systems and up to 32 zpools for systems with 16 or
> more CPUs. This number is sufficient to keep the probability of
> busy-waiting by a thread under 40%. The upper limit of 32 zpools remains
> unchanged.
>
> For memory, it limits to 1 zpool per 60MB of memory for the 20% default
> max pool size limit, assuming the best case with no fragmentation in
> zspages. It expects 90% pool usage for zsmalloc.
>
> Signed-off-by: Takero Funaki <flintglass@gmail.com>
> ---
I think this needs benchmarking. Theoretical justification is nice,
but I'm not convinced it'll translate neatly to the messy world of
real life systems.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-07 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-06 16:53 Takero Funaki
2024-06-06 17:45 ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-06-07 1:00 ` Takero Funaki
2024-06-07 4:58 ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-06-07 5:49 ` Chengming Zhou
2024-06-07 9:26 ` Nhat Pham [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAKEwX=PBcxsCK+qRvsPLRnDobttzm75YuS6Js7Y4R1MKSf_RxQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=nphamcs@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
--cc=flintglass@gmail.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=yosryahmed@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox