linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Yang <andrew.yang@mediatek.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
	 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
	 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	wsd_upstream@mediatek.com, casper.li@mediatek.com,
	 linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] zsmalloc: Fix races between modifications of fullness and isolated
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 08:37:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKEwX=ObJO8R6ybwXS0iDd0Vrb_pUqJpAV9oV68hsJr2aMsRoA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230727062910.6337-1-andrew.yang@mediatek.com>

On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 11:30 PM Andrew Yang <andrew.yang@mediatek.com> wrote:
>
> Since fullness and isolated share the same unsigned int,
> modifications of them should be protected by the same lock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Yang <andrew.yang@mediatek.com>
> Fixes: c4549b871102 ("zsmalloc: remove zspage isolation for migration")
> ---
> v2: Moving comment too
> ---
>  mm/zsmalloc.c | 14 +++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/zsmalloc.c b/mm/zsmalloc.c
> index 32f5bc4074df..b58f957429f0 100644
> --- a/mm/zsmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/zsmalloc.c
> @@ -1777,6 +1777,7 @@ static void replace_sub_page(struct size_class *class, struct zspage *zspage,
>
>  static bool zs_page_isolate(struct page *page, isolate_mode_t mode)
>  {
> +       struct zs_pool *pool;
>         struct zspage *zspage;
>
>         /*
> @@ -1786,9 +1787,10 @@ static bool zs_page_isolate(struct page *page, isolate_mode_t mode)
>         VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageIsolated(page), page);
>
>         zspage = get_zspage(page);
> -       migrate_write_lock(zspage);
> +       pool = zspage->pool;
> +       spin_lock(&pool->lock);
>         inc_zspage_isolation(zspage);
> -       migrate_write_unlock(zspage);
> +       spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
>
>         return true;
>  }
> @@ -1854,12 +1856,12 @@ static int zs_page_migrate(struct page *newpage, struct page *page,
>         kunmap_atomic(s_addr);
>
>         replace_sub_page(class, zspage, newpage, page);
> +       dec_zspage_isolation(zspage);
>         /*
>          * Since we complete the data copy and set up new zspage structure,
>          * it's okay to release the pool's lock.
>          */
>         spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
> -       dec_zspage_isolation(zspage);
>         migrate_write_unlock(zspage);
>
>         get_page(newpage);
> @@ -1876,14 +1878,16 @@ static int zs_page_migrate(struct page *newpage, struct page *page,
>
>  static void zs_page_putback(struct page *page)
>  {
> +       struct zs_pool *pool;
>         struct zspage *zspage;
>
>         VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageIsolated(page), page);
>
>         zspage = get_zspage(page);
> -       migrate_write_lock(zspage);
> +       pool = zspage->pool;
> +       spin_lock(&pool->lock);
>         dec_zspage_isolation(zspage);
> -       migrate_write_unlock(zspage);
> +       spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
>  }
>
>  static const struct movable_operations zsmalloc_mops = {
> --
> 2.18.0
>
>

I think this fixes an issue of mine that has been bugging me for
the past couple of weeks :) Thanks a lot, Andrew!

This should be added to other Linux stable versions too, right?
(with the caveat that before 6.2, use class's lock instead of
pool's lock).

Reviewed-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>


      parent reply	other threads:[~2023-08-10 15:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-27  6:29 Andrew Yang
2023-07-28  3:53 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2023-08-10 15:37 ` Nhat Pham [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAKEwX=ObJO8R6ybwXS0iDd0Vrb_pUqJpAV9oV68hsJr2aMsRoA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=nphamcs@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andrew.yang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=casper.li@mediatek.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
    --cc=wsd_upstream@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox