From: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bfoster@redhat.com, willy@infradead.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] cachestat: implement cachestat syscall
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 08:23:31 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKEwX=NwUPShF3zud7kn_gyd4BZy8S6xzm6iFuw0eW=o=3A8nw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y5UbhBTB2nSMN4UD@ZenIV>
On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 3:51 PM Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 09:51:39AM -0800, Nhat Pham wrote:
>
> > + if (!access_ok(cstat, sizeof(struct cachestat)))
> > + return -EFAULT;
>
> What for? You are using copy_to_user() later, right?
Oh I didn't realize copy_to_user() would suffice - mincore also
has this check:
if (!access_ok(vec, pages))
return -EFAULT;
(even though it also has a similar check with copy_to_user),
so I just erred on the side of safety and included it. If this is
redundant, I'll just remove it from the next version.
>
> > + f = fdget(fd);
> > + if (f.file) {
>
> It would be easier to read if you inverted the condition here.
Oh I think I tried
if (!f.file)
return -EBADF;
here, but there are some mixing-code-with-decl warnings.
If I recall correctly, the problem is with this line:
XA_STATE(xas, &mapping->i_pages, first_index);
which is expanded into a declaration:
#define XA_STATE(name, array, index) \
struct xa_state name = __XA_STATE(array, index, 0, 0)
It requires a valid mapping though, which is
obtained from f.file:
struct address_space *mapping = f.file->f_mapping;
so it cannot be moved above the if(!f.file) check either...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-12 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-05 17:51 [PATCH v2 0/4] cachestat: a new syscall for page cache state of files Nhat Pham
2022-12-05 17:51 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] workingset: fix confusion around eviction vs refault container Nhat Pham
2022-12-05 17:51 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] workingset: refactor LRU refault to expose refault recency check Nhat Pham
2022-12-05 23:49 ` Yu Zhao
2022-12-06 1:19 ` Nhat Pham
2022-12-06 1:28 ` Yu Zhao
2022-12-06 2:22 ` Nhat Pham
2022-12-06 2:25 ` Yu Zhao
2022-12-08 18:07 ` Nhat Pham
2022-12-06 15:22 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-12-07 17:28 ` Nhat Pham
2022-12-05 17:51 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] cachestat: implement cachestat syscall Nhat Pham
2022-12-05 23:15 ` kernel test robot
2022-12-06 4:48 ` kernel test robot
2022-12-06 4:59 ` kernel test robot
2022-12-07 1:42 ` kernel test robot
2022-12-10 23:51 ` Al Viro
2022-12-12 13:22 ` Brian Foster
2022-12-12 16:50 ` Nhat Pham
2022-12-12 16:23 ` Nhat Pham [this message]
2022-12-12 16:24 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-12-12 16:37 ` Nhat Pham
2022-12-05 17:51 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] selftests: Add selftests for cachestat Nhat Pham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAKEwX=NwUPShF3zud7kn_gyd4BZy8S6xzm6iFuw0eW=o=3A8nw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=nphamcs@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox