From: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
To: Qun-Wei Lin <qun-wei.lin@mediatek.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>,
Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>,
Dan Schatzberg <schatzberg.dan@gmail.com>,
Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
Casper Li <casper.li@mediatek.com>,
Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com>,
Andrew Yang <andrew.yang@mediatek.com>,
James Hsu <james.hsu@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Improve Zram by separating compression context from kswapd
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 15:03:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKEwX=NfKrisQL-DBcNxBwK2ErK-u=MSzHNpETcuWWNBh9s9Bg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250307120141.1566673-1-qun-wei.lin@mediatek.com>
On Fri, Mar 7, 2025 at 4:02 AM Qun-Wei Lin <qun-wei.lin@mediatek.com> wrote:
>
> This patch series introduces a new mechanism called kcompressd to
> improve the efficiency of memory reclaiming in the operating system. The
> main goal is to separate the tasks of page scanning and page compression
> into distinct processes or threads, thereby reducing the load on the
> kswapd thread and enhancing overall system performance under high memory
> pressure conditions.
Please excuse my ignorance, but from your cover letter I still don't
quite get what is the problem here? And how would decouple compression
and scanning help?
>
> Problem:
> In the current system, the kswapd thread is responsible for both
> scanning the LRU pages and compressing pages into the ZRAM. This
> combined responsibility can lead to significant performance bottlenecks,
What bottleneck are we talking about? Is one stage slower than the other?
> especially under high memory pressure. The kswapd thread becomes a
> single point of contention, causing delays in memory reclaiming and
> overall system performance degradation.
>
> Target:
> The target of this invention is to improve the efficiency of memory
> reclaiming. By separating the tasks of page scanning and page
> compression into distinct processes or threads, the system can handle
> memory pressure more effectively.
I'm not a zram maintainer, so I'm definitely not trying to stop this
patch. But whatever problem zram is facing will likely occur with
zswap too, so I'd like to learn more :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-07 23:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-07 12:01 Qun-Wei Lin
2025-03-07 12:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm: Split BLK_FEAT_SYNCHRONOUS and SWP_SYNCHRONOUS_IO into separate read and write flags Qun-Wei Lin
2025-03-07 12:01 ` [PATCH 2/2] kcompressd: Add Kcompressd for accelerated zram compression Qun-Wei Lin
2025-03-07 19:41 ` Barry Song
2025-03-07 23:13 ` Nhat Pham
2025-03-07 23:14 ` Nhat Pham
2025-03-10 13:26 ` Qun-wei Lin (林群崴)
[not found] ` <20250309010541.3152-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2025-03-09 19:56 ` Nhat Pham
2025-03-09 20:44 ` Barry Song
2025-03-09 22:20 ` Nhat Pham
2025-03-10 13:23 ` Qun-wei Lin (林群崴)
[not found] ` <20250310103427.3216-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2025-03-10 17:44 ` Barry Song
[not found] ` <20250310230902.3282-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2025-03-11 3:57 ` Barry Song
2025-03-11 6:36 ` Greg KH
2025-03-11 5:02 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-03-10 13:26 ` Qun-wei Lin (林群崴)
2025-03-11 7:05 ` Barry Song
2025-03-11 7:25 ` Barry Song
2025-03-11 14:33 ` Qun-wei Lin (林群崴)
2025-03-07 19:34 ` [PATCH 0/2] Improve Zram by separating compression context from kswapd Barry Song
2025-03-10 13:21 ` Qun-wei Lin (林群崴)
2025-03-07 23:03 ` Nhat Pham [this message]
2025-03-08 5:41 ` Barry Song
2025-03-10 13:22 ` Qun-wei Lin (林群崴)
2025-03-10 16:58 ` Nhat Pham
2025-03-10 17:30 ` Nhat Pham
2025-03-11 4:58 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-03-11 9:33 ` Barry Song
2025-03-11 14:12 ` Qun-wei Lin (林群崴)
2025-03-12 5:19 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-03-12 18:11 ` Minchan Kim
2025-03-13 3:09 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-03-13 3:45 ` Barry Song
2025-03-13 16:07 ` Minchan Kim
2025-03-13 16:58 ` Barry Song
2025-03-13 17:33 ` Minchan Kim
2025-03-13 20:37 ` Barry Song
2025-03-13 3:52 ` Barry Song
2025-03-13 9:30 ` Barry Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAKEwX=NfKrisQL-DBcNxBwK2ErK-u=MSzHNpETcuWWNBh9s9Bg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=nphamcs@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrew.yang@mediatek.com \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=casper.li@mediatek.com \
--cc=chinwen.chang@mediatek.com \
--cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=james.hsu@mediatek.com \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=qun-wei.lin@mediatek.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=schatzberg.dan@gmail.com \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox