linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Timothy Normand Miller <theosib@gmail.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Subject: Re: [Bug 107771] New: Single process tries to use more than 1/2 physical RAM, OS starts thrashing
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 18:44:24 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK7bmU-7yD7+W6gS1Ka9svxnsAR6OGYD1xcwuNQLYuRjLQ1wtw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460748682.25336.41.camel@redhat.com>

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-04-15 at 12:15 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> (switched to email.  Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via
>> the
>> bugzilla web interface).
>>
>> This is ... interesting.
>
> First things first. What is the value of
> /proc/sys/vm/zone_reclaim?

There is no such thing on this system.  However:

$ cat /proc/sys/vm/zone_reclaim_mode
0

>
> I am assuming this is a two socket system,
> with two 12-core CPUs. Am I right?

Yes.

>
>> On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 18:46:35 +0000 bugzilla-
>> daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107771
>> >
>> >             Bug ID: 107771
>> >            Summary: Single process tries to use more than 1/2
>> > physical
>> >                     RAM, OS starts thrashing
>> >            Product: Memory Management
>> >            Version: 2.5
>> >     Kernel Version: 4.3.0-040300-generic (Ubuntu)
>> >           Hardware: All
>> >                 OS: Linux
>> >               Tree: Mainline
>> >             Status: NEW
>> >           Severity: normal
>> >           Priority: P1
>> >          Component: Page Allocator
>> >           Assignee: akpm@linux-foundation.org
>> >           Reporter: theosib@gmail.com
>> >         Regression: No
>> >
>> > I have a 24-core (48 thread) system with 64GB of RAM.
>> >
>> > When I run multiple processes, I can use all of physical RAM before
>> > swapping
>> > starts.  However, if I'm running only a *single* process, the
>> > system will start
>> > swapping after I've exceeded only 1/2 of available physical
>> > RAM.  Only after
>> > swap fills does it start using more of the physical RAM.
>> >
>> > I can't find any ulimit settings or anything else that would cause
>> > this to
>> > happen intentionally.
>> >
>> > I had originally filed this against Ubuntu, but I'm now running a
>> > more recent
>> > kernel, and the problem persists, so I think it's more appropriate
>> > to file
>> > here.  There are some logs that they had me collect, so if you want
>> > to see
>> > them, the are here:
>> >
>> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1513673
>> >
>> > I don't recall this problem happening with older kernels (whatever
>> > came with
>> > Ubuntu 15.04), although I may just not have noticed.  By swapping
>> > early, I'm
>> > limited by the speed of my SSD, which is moving only about 20MB/sec
>> > in each
>> > direction, and that makes what I'm running take 10 times as long to
>> > complete.
>> >
> --
> All Rights Reversed.
>



-- 
Timothy Normand Miller, PhD
Assistant Professor of Computer Science, Binghamton University
http://www.cs.binghamton.edu/~millerti/
Open Graphics Project

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

      parent reply	other threads:[~2016-04-22 22:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-107771-27@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2016-04-15 19:15 ` Andrew Morton
2016-04-15 19:31   ` Rik van Riel
2016-04-17 18:53     ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-22 23:01       ` Timothy Normand Miller
2016-04-22 22:44     ` Timothy Normand Miller [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAK7bmU-7yD7+W6gS1Ka9svxnsAR6OGYD1xcwuNQLYuRjLQ1wtw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=theosib@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox