linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com>
To: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, willy@infradead.org, sj@kernel.org,
	 maskray@google.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com, david@redhat.com,
	21cnbao@gmail.com,  mhocko@suse.com, fengwei.yin@intel.com,
	zokeefe@google.com,  shy828301@gmail.com, xiehuan09@gmail.com,
	libang.li@antgroup.com,  wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com,
	songmuchun@bytedance.com, peterx@redhat.com,  minchan@kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] mm/rmap: integrate PMD-mapped folio splitting into pagewalk loop
Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 13:43:33 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK1f24mRVam3w9CZkq4O0smGUTVUQfdvA48mqsU+NKxMUxdz1A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0077A412-0AF1-4022-8F49-EE77AE601ECB@nvidia.com>

On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 11:26 PM Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> wrote:
>
> On 1 May 2024, at 0:26, Lance Yang wrote:
>
> > In preparation for supporting try_to_unmap_one() to unmap PMD-mapped
> > folios, start the pagewalk first, then call split_huge_pmd_address()
> > to split the folio.
> >
> > Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/huge_mm.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >  mm/huge_memory.c        | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> >  mm/rmap.c               | 24 +++++++++++++++++------
> >  3 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/huge_mm.h b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> > index c8d3ec116e29..38c4b5537715 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> > @@ -409,6 +409,20 @@ static inline bool thp_migration_supported(void)
> >       return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_ENABLE_THP_MIGRATION);
> >  }
> >
> > +void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
> > +                        pmd_t *pmd, bool freeze, struct folio *folio);
> > +
> > +static inline void align_huge_pmd_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > +                                     unsigned long *start,
> > +                                     unsigned long *end)
> > +{
> > +     *start = ALIGN(*start, HPAGE_PMD_SIZE);
> > +     *end = ALIGN_DOWN(*end, HPAGE_PMD_SIZE);
> > +
> > +     VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(vma->vm_start > *start);
> > +     VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(vma->vm_end < *end);
> > +}
> > +
> >  #else /* CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE */
> >
> >  static inline bool folio_test_pmd_mappable(struct folio *folio)
> > @@ -471,6 +485,12 @@ static inline void __split_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
> >               unsigned long address, bool freeze, struct folio *folio) {}
> >  static inline void split_huge_pmd_address(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> >               unsigned long address, bool freeze, struct folio *folio) {}
> > +static inline void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > +                                      unsigned long address, pmd_t *pmd,
> > +                                      bool freeze, struct folio *folio) {}
> > +static inline void align_huge_pmd_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > +                                     unsigned long *start,
> > +                                     unsigned long *end) {}
> >
> >  #define split_huge_pud(__vma, __pmd, __address)      \
> >       do { } while (0)
> > diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> > index 8261b5669397..145505a1dd05 100644
> > --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> > +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> > @@ -2584,6 +2584,27 @@ static void __split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
> >       pmd_populate(mm, pmd, pgtable);
> >  }
> >
> > +void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
> > +                        pmd_t *pmd, bool freeze, struct folio *folio)
> > +{
> > +     VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio && !folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio));
> > +     VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ALIGNED(address, HPAGE_PMD_SIZE));
> > +     VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio && !folio_test_locked(folio));
> > +     VM_BUG_ON(freeze && !folio);
> > +
> > +     /*
> > +      * When the caller requests to set up a migration entry, we
> > +      * require a folio to check the PMD against. Otherwise, there
> > +      * is a risk of replacing the wrong folio.
> > +      */
> > +     if (pmd_trans_huge(*pmd) || pmd_devmap(*pmd) ||
> > +         is_pmd_migration_entry(*pmd)) {
> > +             if (folio && folio != pmd_folio(*pmd))
> > +                     return;
> > +             __split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pmd, address, freeze);
> > +     }
> > +}
> > +
> >  void __split_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
> >               unsigned long address, bool freeze, struct folio *folio)
> >  {
> > @@ -2595,26 +2616,7 @@ void __split_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
> >                               (address & HPAGE_PMD_MASK) + HPAGE_PMD_SIZE);
> >       mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range);
> >       ptl = pmd_lock(vma->vm_mm, pmd);
> > -
> > -     /*
> > -      * If caller asks to setup a migration entry, we need a folio to check
> > -      * pmd against. Otherwise we can end up replacing wrong folio.
> > -      */
> > -     VM_BUG_ON(freeze && !folio);
> > -     VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio && !folio_test_locked(folio));
> > -
> > -     if (pmd_trans_huge(*pmd) || pmd_devmap(*pmd) ||
> > -         is_pmd_migration_entry(*pmd)) {
> > -             /*
> > -              * It's safe to call pmd_page when folio is set because it's
> > -              * guaranteed that pmd is present.
> > -              */
> > -             if (folio && folio != pmd_folio(*pmd))
> > -                     goto out;
> > -             __split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pmd, range.start, freeze);
> > -     }
> > -
> > -out:
> > +     split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, range.start, pmd, freeze, folio);
> >       spin_unlock(ptl);
> >       mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(&range);
> >  }
> > diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
> > index 7e2575d669a9..432601154583 100644
> > --- a/mm/rmap.c
> > +++ b/mm/rmap.c
> > @@ -1636,9 +1636,6 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> >       if (flags & TTU_SYNC)
> >               pvmw.flags = PVMW_SYNC;
> >
> > -     if (flags & TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD)
> > -             split_huge_pmd_address(vma, address, false, folio);
> > -
> >       /*
> >        * For THP, we have to assume the worse case ie pmd for invalidation.
> >        * For hugetlb, it could be much worse if we need to do pud
> > @@ -1650,6 +1647,8 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> >       range.end = vma_address_end(&pvmw);
> >       mmu_notifier_range_init(&range, MMU_NOTIFY_CLEAR, 0, vma->vm_mm,
> >                               address, range.end);
> > +     if (flags & TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD)
> > +             align_huge_pmd_range(vma, &range.start, &range.end);
> >       if (folio_test_hugetlb(folio)) {
> >               /*
> >                * If sharing is possible, start and end will be adjusted
> > @@ -1664,9 +1663,6 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> >       mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range);
> >
> >       while (page_vma_mapped_walk(&pvmw)) {
> > -             /* Unexpected PMD-mapped THP? */
> > -             VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!pvmw.pte, folio);
> > -
> >               /*
> >                * If the folio is in an mlock()d vma, we must not swap it out.
> >                */
> > @@ -1678,6 +1674,22 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> >                       goto walk_done_err;
> >               }
> >
> > +             if (!pvmw.pte && (flags & TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD)) {
> > +                     /*
> > +                      * We temporarily have to drop the PTL and start once
> > +                      * again from that now-PTE-mapped page table.
> > +                      */
> > +                     split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, range.start, pvmw.pmd, false,
> > +                                           folio);
>
> Just in case you might miss here, since you will no longer align
> range.start as Baolin mentioned in another email and you have a VM_WARN_ONCE
> in split_huge_pmd_locked(), you will need to align the input address now.

Thanks for bringing that up!

I do miss the alignment here when I decide to no longer align range.start
in another email - thanks!

Zi, could I move the alignment here?
IIUC, we will not encounter a partially mapped THP here, and range.start
and range.end should also not beyond the VMA limits.

                     align_huge_pmd_range(vma, &range.start, &range.end);
                     split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, range.start, pvmw.pmd, false,
                                           folio);


Thanks,
Lance

>
> > +                     pvmw.pmd = NULL;
> > +                     spin_unlock(pvmw.ptl);
> > +                     flags &= ~TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD;
> > +                     continue;
> > +             }
> > +
> > +             /* Unexpected PMD-mapped THP? */
> > +             VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!pvmw.pte, folio);
> > +
> >               pfn = pte_pfn(ptep_get(pvmw.pte));
> >               subpage = folio_page(folio, pfn - folio_pfn(folio));
> >               address = pvmw.address;
> > --
> > 2.33.1
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Yan, Zi


  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-08  5:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-01  4:26 [PATCH v4 0/3] Reclaim lazyfree THP without splitting Lance Yang
2024-05-01  4:26 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] mm/rmap: remove duplicated exit code in pagewalk loop Lance Yang
2024-05-07 14:51   ` Zi Yan
2024-05-07 14:53     ` Lance Yang
2024-05-01  4:26 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] mm/rmap: integrate PMD-mapped folio splitting into " Lance Yang
2024-05-07  3:40   ` Baolin Wang
2024-05-07  4:37     ` Lance Yang
2024-05-07  8:17       ` David Hildenbrand
2024-05-07  8:38         ` Lance Yang
2024-05-07 17:22           ` Andrew Morton
2024-05-07 17:33             ` David Hildenbrand
2024-05-07 17:38               ` Andrew Morton
2024-05-07 18:30                 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-05-07 15:26   ` Zi Yan
2024-05-08  5:43     ` Lance Yang [this message]
2024-05-08 14:07       ` Zi Yan
2024-05-08 14:35         ` Lance Yang
2024-05-08 14:48           ` Zi Yan
2024-05-08 14:56             ` Zi Yan
2024-05-08 15:52               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-05-08 16:22                 ` Zi Yan
2024-05-08 16:35                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-05-09  8:21                     ` Lance Yang
2024-05-09 14:53                       ` Zi Yan
2024-05-09  8:56                     ` Lance Yang
2024-05-01  4:27 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] mm/vmscan: avoid split lazyfree THP during shrink_folio_list() Lance Yang
2024-05-07  4:00   ` Baolin Wang
2024-05-07  6:32     ` Lance Yang
2024-05-07  8:26       ` Lance Yang
2024-05-07  9:33         ` Baolin Wang
2024-05-07 11:37           ` Lance Yang
2024-05-09  9:36             ` Baolin Wang
2024-05-09 12:17               ` Lance Yang
2024-05-07 16:20   ` Zi Yan
2024-05-08  5:14     ` Lance Yang
2024-05-01 16:08 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] Reclaim lazyfree THP without splitting SeongJae Park
2024-05-02  0:30   ` Lance Yang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAK1f24mRVam3w9CZkq4O0smGUTVUQfdvA48mqsU+NKxMUxdz1A@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=ioworker0@gmail.com \
    --cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=fengwei.yin@intel.com \
    --cc=libang.li@antgroup.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=maskray@google.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
    --cc=sj@kernel.org \
    --cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=xiehuan09@gmail.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    --cc=zokeefe@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox