linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, willy@infradead.org, sj@kernel.org,
	 baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, maskray@google.com,
	ziy@nvidia.com,  ryan.roberts@arm.com, 21cnbao@gmail.com,
	mhocko@suse.com,  fengwei.yin@intel.com, zokeefe@google.com,
	shy828301@gmail.com,  xiehuan09@gmail.com,
	libang.li@antgroup.com, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com,
	 songmuchun@bytedance.com, peterx@redhat.com, minchan@kernel.org,
	 linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/3] mm/vmscan: avoid split lazyfree THP during shrink_folio_list()
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 09:56:51 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK1f24kaGo3PJSd83=-t_uAFTTJiSsZvJTmsX9co4ueFDiPneA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e7c0aff1-b690-4926-9a34-4e32c9f3faaa@redhat.com>

On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 2:04 AM David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Sorry for taking so long to review ... getting there. Mostly nits.

No worries at all :)

Thanks for taking time to review!

>
> > @@ -497,6 +499,13 @@ static inline void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> >                                        unsigned long address, pmd_t *pmd,
> >                                        bool freeze, struct folio *folio) {}
> >
> > +static inline bool unmap_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > +                                      unsigned long addr, pmd_t *pmdp,
> > +                                      struct folio *folio)
> > +{
> > +     return false;
> > +}
> > +
> >   #define split_huge_pud(__vma, __pmd, __address)     \
> >       do { } while (0)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> > index e766d3f3a302..425374ae06ed 100644
> > --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> > +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> > @@ -2688,6 +2688,82 @@ static void unmap_folio(struct folio *folio)
> >       try_to_unmap_flush();
> >   }
> >
> > +static bool __discard_anon_folio_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > +                                         unsigned long addr, pmd_t *pmdp,
> > +                                         struct folio *folio)
> > +{
> > +     VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_swapbacked(folio), folio);
> > +     VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_anon(folio), folio);
>
> I would drop these (that's exactly what the single caller checks). In

Agreed. I will drop these.

> any case don't place them above the variable declaration ;)

Yep, I see.

>
> > +
> > +     struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
> > +     int ref_count, map_count;
> > +     pmd_t orig_pmd = *pmdp;
> > +     struct page *page;
> > +
> > +     if (unlikely(!pmd_present(orig_pmd) || !pmd_trans_huge(orig_pmd)))
> > +             return false;
> > +
> > +     page = pmd_page(orig_pmd);
> > +     if (unlikely(page_folio(page) != folio))
> > +             return false;
>
> I'm curious, how could that happen? And how could it happen that we have
> !pmd_trans_huge() ? Didn't rmap walking code make sure that this PMD
> maps the folio already, and we are holding the PTL?

Makes sense to me. I was adding these just in case, but it's probably too much.

Let's drop them ;)

>
> > +
> > +     if (folio_test_dirty(folio) || pmd_dirty(orig_pmd))
> > +             return false;
> > +
> > +     orig_pmd = pmdp_huge_clear_flush(vma, addr, pmdp);
> > +
> > +     /*
> > +      * Syncing against concurrent GUP-fast:
> > +      * - clear PMD; barrier; read refcount
> > +      * - inc refcount; barrier; read PMD
> > +      */
> > +     smp_mb();
> > +
> > +     ref_count = folio_ref_count(folio);
> > +     map_count = folio_mapcount(folio);
> > +
> > +     /*
> > +      * Order reads for folio refcount and dirty flag
> > +      * (see comments in __remove_mapping()).
> > +      */
> > +     smp_rmb();
> > +
> > +     /*
> > +      * If the folio or its PMD is redirtied at this point, or if there
> > +      * are unexpected references, we will give up to discard this folio
> > +      * and remap it.
> > +      *
> > +      * The only folio refs must be one from isolation plus the rmap(s).
> > +      */
> > +     if (folio_test_dirty(folio) || pmd_dirty(orig_pmd) ||
> > +         ref_count != map_count + 1) {
> > +             set_pmd_at(mm, addr, pmdp, orig_pmd);
> > +             return false;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     folio_remove_rmap_pmd(folio, page, vma);
> > +     zap_deposited_table(mm, pmdp);
> > +     add_mm_counter(mm, MM_ANONPAGES, -HPAGE_PMD_NR);
> > +     if (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED)
> > +             mlock_drain_local();
> > +     folio_put(folio);
> > +
> > +     return true;
> > +}
> > +
> > +bool unmap_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
> > +                        pmd_t *pmdp, struct folio *folio)
> > +{
> > +     VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio), folio);
> > +     VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_locked(folio), folio);
> > +     VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ALIGNED(addr, HPAGE_PMD_SIZE));
> > +
> > +     if (folio_test_anon(folio) && !folio_test_swapbacked(folio))
> > +             return __discard_anon_folio_pmd_locked(vma, addr, pmdp, folio);
> > +
> > +     return false;
> > +}
> > +
> >   static void remap_page(struct folio *folio, unsigned long nr)
> >   {
> >       int i = 0;
> > diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
> > index dacf24bc82f0..7d97806f74cd 100644
> > --- a/mm/rmap.c
> > +++ b/mm/rmap.c
> > @@ -1678,16 +1678,23 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> >                       goto walk_abort;
> >               }
> >
> > -             if (!pvmw.pte && (flags & TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD)) {
> > -                     /*
> > -                      * We temporarily have to drop the PTL and start once
> > -                      * again from that now-PTE-mapped page table.
> > -                      */
> > -                     split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pvmw.address, pvmw.pmd,
> > -                                           false, folio);
> > -                     flags &= ~TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD;
> > -                     page_vma_mapped_walk_restart(&pvmw);
> > -                     continue;
> > +             if (!pvmw.pte) {
> > +                     if (unmap_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pvmw.address, pvmw.pmd,
> > +                                               folio))
> > +                             goto walk_done;
> > +
> > +                     if (flags & TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD) {
> > +                             /*
> > +                              * We temporarily have to drop the PTL and start
> > +                              * once again from that now-PTE-mapped page
> > +                              * table.
>
> Nit: it's not a PTE-mapped page table.
>
> Maybe
>
> "... restart so we can process the PTE-mapped THP."

Nice. Will adjust as you suggested.

>
>
>
> >               }
> >
> >               /* Unexpected PMD-mapped THP? */
>
> Nothing else jumped at me :)

Thanks again for your time!
Lance

>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> David / dhildenb
>


  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-18  1:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-14  1:51 [PATCH v8 0/3] Reclaim lazyfree THP without splitting Lance Yang
2024-06-14  1:51 ` [PATCH v8 1/3] mm/rmap: remove duplicated exit code in pagewalk loop Lance Yang
2024-06-14  1:51 ` [PATCH v8 2/3] mm/rmap: integrate PMD-mapped folio splitting into " Lance Yang
2024-06-14  7:34   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-06-14  7:46     ` Lance Yang
2024-06-14 14:26   ` Zi Yan
2024-06-14 14:41     ` Lance Yang
2024-06-14  1:51 ` [PATCH v8 3/3] mm/vmscan: avoid split lazyfree THP during shrink_folio_list() Lance Yang
2024-06-17 18:04   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-06-18  1:56     ` Lance Yang [this message]
2024-06-22 10:00     ` Lance Yang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAK1f24kaGo3PJSd83=-t_uAFTTJiSsZvJTmsX9co4ueFDiPneA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=ioworker0@gmail.com \
    --cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=fengwei.yin@intel.com \
    --cc=libang.li@antgroup.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=maskray@google.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
    --cc=sj@kernel.org \
    --cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=xiehuan09@gmail.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    --cc=zokeefe@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox