From: Tyler Sanderson <tysand@google.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] virtio-balloon: Switch back to OOM handler for VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_DEFLATE_ON_OOM
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 19:29:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJuQAmqmOQMx3A8g81pnFLyTZ5E5joSCEGG5fBwPOBH7crdi2w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200216044641-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3842 bytes --]
Testing this patch is on my short-term TODO list, but I wasn't able to get
to it this week. It is prioritized.
In the meantime, I can anecdotally vouch that kernels before 4.19, the ones
using the OOM notifier callback, have roughly 10x faster balloon inflation
when pressuring the cache. So I anticipate this patch will return to that
state and help my use case.
I will try to post official measurements of this patch next week.
On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 1:47 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 10:51:43AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > On 05.02.20 17:34, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > > Commit 71994620bb25 ("virtio_balloon: replace oom notifier with
> shrinker")
> > > changed the behavior when deflation happens automatically. Instead of
> > > deflating when called by the OOM handler, the shrinker is used.
> > >
> > > However, the balloon is not simply some slab cache that should be
> > > shrunk when under memory pressure. The shrinker does not have a
> concept of
> > > priorities, so this behavior cannot be configured.
> > >
> > > There was a report that this results in undesired side effects when
> > > inflating the balloon to shrink the page cache. [1]
> > > "When inflating the balloon against page cache (i.e. no free memory
> > > remains) vmscan.c will both shrink page cache, but also invoke the
> > > shrinkers -- including the balloon's shrinker. So the balloon
> > > driver allocates memory which requires reclaim, vmscan gets this
> > > memory by shrinking the balloon, and then the driver adds the
> > > memory back to the balloon. Basically a busy no-op."
> > >
> > > The name "deflate on OOM" makes it pretty clear when deflation should
> > > happen - after other approaches to reclaim memory failed, not while
> > > reclaiming. This allows to minimize the footprint of a guest - memory
> > > will only be taken out of the balloon when really needed.
> > >
> > > Especially, a drop_slab() will result in the whole balloon getting
> > > deflated - undesired. While handling it via the OOM handler might not
> be
> > > perfect, it keeps existing behavior. If we want a different behavior,
> then
> > > we need a new feature bit and document it properly (although, there
> should
> > > be a clear use case and the intended effects should be well described).
> > >
> > > Keep using the shrinker for VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_FREE_PAGE_HINT, because
> > > this has no such side effects. Always register the shrinker with
> > > VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_FREE_PAGE_HINT now. We are always allowed to reuse
> free
> > > pages that are still to be processed by the guest. The hypervisor takes
> > > care of identifying and resolving possible races between processing a
> > > hinting request and the guest reusing a page.
> > >
> > > In contrast to pre commit 71994620bb25 ("virtio_balloon: replace oom
> > > notifier with shrinker"), don't add a moodule parameter to configure
> the
> > > number of pages to deflate on OOM. Can be re-added if really needed.
> > > Also, pay attention that leak_balloon() returns the number of 4k pages
> -
> > > convert it properly in virtio_balloon_oom_notify().
> > >
> > > Note1: using the OOM handler is frowned upon, but it really is what we
> > > need for this feature.
> > >
> > > Note2: without VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_MUST_TELL_HOST (iow, always with QEMU)
> we
> > > could actually skip sending deflation requests to our
> hypervisor,
> > > making the OOM path *very* simple. Besically freeing pages and
> > > updating the balloon. If the communication with the host ever
> > > becomes a problem on this call path.
> > >
> >
> > @Michael, how to proceed with this?
> >
>
> I'd like to see some reports that this helps people.
> e.g. a tested-by tag.
>
> > --
> > Thanks,
> >
> > David / dhildenb
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4768 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-21 3:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-05 16:33 [PATCH v1 0/3] virtio-balloon: Fixes + switch back to OOM handler David Hildenbrand
2020-02-05 16:34 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] virtio-balloon: Fix memory leak when unloading while hinting is in progress David Hildenbrand
2020-02-06 8:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-02-05 16:34 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] virtio_balloon: Fix memory leaks on errors in virtballoon_probe() David Hildenbrand
2020-02-06 8:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-02-05 16:34 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] virtio-balloon: Switch back to OOM handler for VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_DEFLATE_ON_OOM David Hildenbrand
2020-02-05 22:37 ` Tyler Sanderson
2020-02-05 22:52 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-05 23:06 ` Tyler Sanderson
2020-02-06 7:40 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-02-06 8:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-06 8:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-02-06 9:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-06 9:09 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-02-06 8:57 ` Wang, Wei W
2020-02-06 9:11 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-02-06 9:12 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-02-06 9:21 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-14 9:51 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-14 13:31 ` Wang, Wei W
2020-02-16 9:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-02-21 3:29 ` Tyler Sanderson [this message]
2020-03-08 4:47 ` Tyler Sanderson
2020-03-09 9:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-09 10:14 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-03-09 10:59 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-09 10:24 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-02-14 14:06 ` Michal Hocko
2020-02-14 14:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-14 20:48 ` Tyler Sanderson
2020-02-14 21:17 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-16 9:46 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJuQAmqmOQMx3A8g81pnFLyTZ5E5joSCEGG5fBwPOBH7crdi2w@mail.gmail.com \
--to=tysand@google.com \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=namit@vmware.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox