linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
To: Hao Ge <hao.ge@linux.dev>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	 Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
	 Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	 Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>,
	 Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	 Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	 Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	 Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,  linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Hao Ge <gehao@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] mm: Restrict the static definition of the per-CPU variable _shared_alloc_tag to s390 and alpha architectures only
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 12:19:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJuCfpHhVhAEPqGXR=b6gdykZTtZsOA7cXX2CJKcX3TX++bs6w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1749779391.git.gehao@kylinos.cn>

On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 8:06 PM Hao Ge <hao.ge@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> From: Hao Ge <gehao@kylinos.cn>
>
> Recently discovered this entry while checking kallsyms on ARM64:
> ffff800083e509c0 D _shared_alloc_tag
>
> If ARCH_NEEDS_WEAK_PER_CPU is not defined((it is only defined for
> s390 and alpha architectures),there's no need to statically define
> the percpu variable _shared_alloc_tag. As the number of CPUs
> increases,the wasted memory will grow correspondingly.
>
> Therefore,we need to implement isolation for this purpose.
>
> However,currently ARCH_NEEDS_WEAK_PER_CPU is a #define and
> is enclosed within the #if defined(MODULE) conditional block.
>
> When building the core kernel code for s390 or alpha architectures,
> ARCH_NEEDS_WEAK_PER_CPU remains undefined (as it is gated
> by #if defined(MODULE)). However,when building modules for these
> architectures,the macro is explicitly defined.
>
> Therefore,we need to make ARCH_NEEDS_WEAK_PER_CPU a Kconfig option.
> And replace all instances of ARCH_NEEDS_WEAK_PER_CPU in the kernel
> code with MODULE_NEEDS_WEAK_PER_CPU,MODULE_NEEDS_WEAK_PER_CPU might
> be a more accurate description,because it was only needed for modules.
> Then,when defining the percpu variable _shared_alloc_tag,wrap it with the
> CONFIG_ARCH_NEEDS_WEAK_PER_CPU condition.
>
> The following version can be regarded as the most original version:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250529073537.563107-1-hao.ge@linux.dev/
> But unfortunately,it caused build errors on s390.
> Based on Suren's guidance and suggestions,
> I've refined it into this patch series.
> Many thanks to Suren for his patient instruction.

I think the first two patches in your patchset should be merged together.

>
> Verify:
>      1. On Arm64:
>         nm vmlinux | grep "_shared_alloc_tag",no output is returned.
>      2. On S390:
>         Compile tested.
>         nm vmlinux | grep "_shared_alloc_tag"
>         00000000015605b4 r __crc__shared_alloc_tag
>         0000000001585fef r __kstrtab__shared_alloc_tag
>         0000000001586897 r __kstrtabns__shared_alloc_tag
>         00000000014f6548 r __ksymtab__shared_alloc_tag
>         0000000001a8fa28 D _shared_alloc_tag
>         nm net/ceph/libceph.ko | grep "_shared"
>         U _shared_alloc_tag
>      3. On alpha
>         Compile tested.
>         nm vmlinux | grep "_shared_alloc_tag"
>         fffffc0000b080fa r __kstrtab__shared_alloc_tag
>         fffffc0000b07ee7 r __kstrtabns__shared_alloc_tag
>         fffffc0000adee98 r __ksymtab__shared_alloc_tag
>         fffffc0000b83d38 D _shared_alloc_tag
>         nm crypto/cryptomgr.ko | grep "_share"
>         U _shared_alloc_tag
>
> v2:
>     Heiko pointed out that when defining MODULE_NEEDS_WEAK_PER_CPU,
>     the CONFIG_ARCH_NEEDS_WEAK_PER_CPU condition in the v1 version
>     should be removed,as it is always true for s390 and alpha
>     architectures.And He also pointed out that patches 2-4 need to
>     be merged into one patch. Modify the code according to the suggestions
>     and update the corresponding commit message.
>
> Hao Ge (3):
>   mm/Kconfig: add ARCH_NEEDS_WEAK_PER_CPU Option and enable it for
>     s390/alpha
>   mm: replace ARCH_NEEDS_WEAK_PER_CPU with MODULE_NEEDS_WEAK_PER_CPU
>   mm/alloc_tag: add the CONFIG_ARCH_NEEDS_WEAK_PER_CPU macro when
>     statically defining the percpu variable _shared_alloc_tag
>
>  arch/alpha/Kconfig              | 1 +
>  arch/alpha/include/asm/percpu.h | 2 +-
>  arch/s390/Kconfig               | 1 +
>  arch/s390/include/asm/percpu.h  | 2 +-
>  include/linux/alloc_tag.h       | 6 +++---
>  include/linux/percpu-defs.h     | 4 ++--
>  lib/alloc_tag.c                 | 2 ++
>  mm/Kconfig                      | 4 ++++
>  8 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>


      parent reply	other threads:[~2025-06-13 19:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-13  3:05 Hao Ge
2025-06-13  3:05 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] mm/Kconfig: add ARCH_NEEDS_WEAK_PER_CPU Option and enable it for s390/alpha Hao Ge
2025-06-13  3:05 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] mm: replace ARCH_NEEDS_WEAK_PER_CPU with MODULE_NEEDS_WEAK_PER_CPU Hao Ge
2025-06-13  3:05 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] mm/alloc_tag: add the CONFIG_ARCH_NEEDS_WEAK_PER_CPU macro when statically defining the percpu variable _shared_alloc_tag Hao Ge
2025-06-13 19:21   ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-06-13 19:19 ` Suren Baghdasaryan [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJuCfpHhVhAEPqGXR=b6gdykZTtZsOA7cXX2CJKcX3TX++bs6w@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dennis@kernel.org \
    --cc=gehao@kylinos.cn \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hao.ge@linux.dev \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=mattst88@gmail.com \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox