From: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@inai.de>,
Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel-team <kernel-team@android.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm: prevent a race between process_mrelease and exit_mmap
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 08:00:04 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJuCfpHXZvCCi=DW53i9qbmcjY48CmSVBCaYqbSyyBmmp9JqaQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YY4snVzZZZYhbigV@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 12:58 AM 'Michal Hocko' via kernel-team
<kernel-team@android.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu 11-11-21 07:02:42, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 1:20 AM Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed 10-11-21 17:49:37, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 1:10 PM Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 12:10 PM Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > > > Yes, those can run concurrently. One thing I completely forgot about is
> > > > > > 27ae357fa82b ("mm, oom: fix concurrent munlock and oom reaper unmap, v3")
> > > > > > which is about interaction with the munlock.
> > > >
> > > > Agrh! This interaction with the munlock you mentioned requires us to
> > > > take mmap_write_lock before munlock_vma_pages_all and that prevents
> > > > __oom_reap_task_mm from running concurrently with unmap_vmas. The
> > > > reapers would not be as effective as they are now after such a change
> > > > :(
> > >
> > > __oom_reap_task_mm will not run concurrently with unmap_vmas even
> > > with the current code. The mmap_sem barrier right before munlock code
> > > prevents that.
> >
> > You are right, it will run concurrently with another
> > __oom_reap_task_mm in the exit_mmap. But I thought we wanted to get
> > rid of that call to __oom_reap_task_mm in exit_mmap or did I
> > misunderstand?
>
> I do not remember this to be objective or the motivation. IIRC we wanted
> to make the locking more robust which would help your process_mrelease
> use case. This one currently suffers from a much heavier cost if it
> turns out to be the last holder of the reference count on the address
> space.
Ok, I wrongly assumed the mmap_lock cleanup should be deeper. Will
keep pounding on it. Thanks!
> --
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kernel-team+unsubscribe@android.com.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-12 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-22 1:46 Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-10-22 2:24 ` Andrew Morton
2021-10-22 5:23 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-10-22 8:03 ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-22 11:32 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-10-22 12:04 ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-22 17:38 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-10-27 16:08 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-10-27 17:33 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-10-27 17:42 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-10-27 17:51 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-10-27 18:00 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-10-29 13:03 ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-29 16:07 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-11-01 8:37 ` Michal Hocko
2021-11-01 15:44 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-11-01 19:59 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-11-02 7:58 ` Michal Hocko
2021-11-02 15:14 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-11-09 19:01 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-11-09 19:26 ` Michal Hocko
2021-11-09 19:37 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-11-09 19:50 ` Michal Hocko
2021-11-09 20:02 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-11-09 20:10 ` Michal Hocko
2021-11-09 21:10 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-11-11 1:49 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-11-11 9:20 ` Michal Hocko
2021-11-11 15:02 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-11-12 8:58 ` Michal Hocko
2021-11-12 16:00 ` Suren Baghdasaryan [this message]
2021-11-09 19:41 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJuCfpHXZvCCi=DW53i9qbmcjY48CmSVBCaYqbSyyBmmp9JqaQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=surenb@google.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
--cc=christian@brauner.io \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jengelh@inai.de \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox