linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/show_mem.c: report alloc tags in human readable units
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 13:10:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJuCfpHQUaSzkOFpj-XHSbTVuOgykkbS8Rj42QFtSUdk7s8rWg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cu62ykkqsnuef45qn44wucsqqmpexx2isadwwuu26rny6femip@ptdf3u6zgcqp>

On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 8:52 PM Kent Overstreet
<kent.overstreet@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 08:32:24PM GMT, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 5:53 PM Kent Overstreet
> > <kent.overstreet@linux.dev> wrote:
> > >
> > > We already do this when reporting slab info - more consistent and more
> > > readable.
> >
> > Hi Kent,
> > I remember we discussed this before and agreed upon Pasha's suggestion
> > that if needed one could do:
> >
> > # sort -g /proc/allocinfo|tail|numfmt --to=iec
> >         2.8M    22648 fs/kernfs/dir.c:615 func:__kernfs_new_node
> >         3.8M      953 mm/memory.c:4214 func:alloc_anon_folio
> >         4.0M     1010 drivers/staging/ctagmod/ctagmod.c:20 [ctagmod]
> > func:ctagmod_start
> >         4.1M        4 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c:2567
> > func:nf_ct_alloc_hashtable
> >         6.0M     1532 mm/filemap.c:1919 func:__filemap_get_folio
> >         8.8M     2785 kernel/fork.c:307 func:alloc_thread_stack_node
> >          13M      234 block/blk-mq.c:3421 func:blk_mq_alloc_rqs
> >          14M     3520 mm/mm_init.c:2530 func:alloc_large_system_hash
> >          15M     3656 mm/readahead.c:247 func:page_cache_ra_unbounded
> >          55M     4887 mm/slub.c:2259 func:alloc_slab_page
> >         122M    31168 mm/page_ext.c:270 func:alloc_page_ext
> >
> > That's even documented here:
> > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.10.8/source/Documentation/mm/allocation-profiling.rst#L36
> > Did something change?
>
> That's for /proc/allocinfo, which this patch doesn't change - this is
> the oom report.

Ah, got it! Looks reasonable to me.

Reviewed-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>


      reply	other threads:[~2024-09-06 20:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-06  0:53 Kent Overstreet
2024-09-06  3:32 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-09-06  3:52   ` Kent Overstreet
2024-09-06 20:10     ` Suren Baghdasaryan [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJuCfpHQUaSzkOFpj-XHSbTVuOgykkbS8Rj42QFtSUdk7s8rWg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox