From: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/show_mem.c: report alloc tags in human readable units
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 13:10:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJuCfpHQUaSzkOFpj-XHSbTVuOgykkbS8Rj42QFtSUdk7s8rWg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cu62ykkqsnuef45qn44wucsqqmpexx2isadwwuu26rny6femip@ptdf3u6zgcqp>
On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 8:52 PM Kent Overstreet
<kent.overstreet@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 08:32:24PM GMT, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 5:53 PM Kent Overstreet
> > <kent.overstreet@linux.dev> wrote:
> > >
> > > We already do this when reporting slab info - more consistent and more
> > > readable.
> >
> > Hi Kent,
> > I remember we discussed this before and agreed upon Pasha's suggestion
> > that if needed one could do:
> >
> > # sort -g /proc/allocinfo|tail|numfmt --to=iec
> > 2.8M 22648 fs/kernfs/dir.c:615 func:__kernfs_new_node
> > 3.8M 953 mm/memory.c:4214 func:alloc_anon_folio
> > 4.0M 1010 drivers/staging/ctagmod/ctagmod.c:20 [ctagmod]
> > func:ctagmod_start
> > 4.1M 4 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c:2567
> > func:nf_ct_alloc_hashtable
> > 6.0M 1532 mm/filemap.c:1919 func:__filemap_get_folio
> > 8.8M 2785 kernel/fork.c:307 func:alloc_thread_stack_node
> > 13M 234 block/blk-mq.c:3421 func:blk_mq_alloc_rqs
> > 14M 3520 mm/mm_init.c:2530 func:alloc_large_system_hash
> > 15M 3656 mm/readahead.c:247 func:page_cache_ra_unbounded
> > 55M 4887 mm/slub.c:2259 func:alloc_slab_page
> > 122M 31168 mm/page_ext.c:270 func:alloc_page_ext
> >
> > That's even documented here:
> > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.10.8/source/Documentation/mm/allocation-profiling.rst#L36
> > Did something change?
>
> That's for /proc/allocinfo, which this patch doesn't change - this is
> the oom report.
Ah, got it! Looks reasonable to me.
Reviewed-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-06 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-06 0:53 Kent Overstreet
2024-09-06 3:32 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-09-06 3:52 ` Kent Overstreet
2024-09-06 20:10 ` Suren Baghdasaryan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJuCfpHQUaSzkOFpj-XHSbTVuOgykkbS8Rj42QFtSUdk7s8rWg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=surenb@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox