Re: [PATCH v2 3/8] mm/rmap: remove unnecessary root lock dance in anon_vma clone, unmap

[Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>]

On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 9:54 AM Lorenzo Stoakes
<lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 08:55:58AM -0800, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 6, 2026 at 7:04 AM Lorenzo Stoakes
> > <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > The root anon_vma of all anon_vma's linked to a VMA must by definition be
> > > the same - a VMA and all of its descendants/ancestors must exist in the
> > > same CoW chain.
> > >
> > > Commit bb4aa39676f7 ("mm: avoid repeated anon_vma lock/unlock sequences in
> > > anon_vma_clone()") introduced paranoid checking of the root anon_vma
> > > remaining the same throughout all AVC's in 2011.
> > >
> > > I think 15 years later we can safely assume that this is always the case.
> > >
> > > Additionally, since unfaulted VMAs being cloned from or unlinked are
> > > no-op's, we can simply lock the anon_vma's associated with this rather than
> > > doing any specific dance around this.
> > >
> > > This removes unnecessary checks and makes it clear that the root anon_vma
> > > is shared between all anon_vma's in a given VMA's anon_vma_chain.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
> > > ---
> > >  mm/rmap.c | 51 +++++++++++++++------------------------------------
> > >  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
> > > index de2cbe860566..6ac42671bedd 100644
> > > --- a/mm/rmap.c
> > > +++ b/mm/rmap.c
> > > @@ -232,32 +232,6 @@ int __anon_vma_prepare(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> > >         return -ENOMEM;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > -/*
> > > - * This is a useful helper function for locking the anon_vma root as
> > > - * we traverse the vma->anon_vma_chain, looping over anon_vma's that
> > > - * have the same vma.
> > > - *
> > > - * Such anon_vma's should have the same root, so you'd expect to see
> > > - * just a single mutex_lock for the whole traversal.
> > > - */
> > > -static inline struct anon_vma *lock_anon_vma_root(struct anon_vma *root, struct anon_vma *anon_vma)
> > > -{
> > > -       struct anon_vma *new_root = anon_vma->root;
> > > -       if (new_root != root) {
> > > -               if (WARN_ON_ONCE(root))
> > > -                       up_write(&root->rwsem);
> > > -               root = new_root;
> > > -               down_write(&root->rwsem);
> > > -       }
> > > -       return root;
> > > -}
> > > -
> > > -static inline void unlock_anon_vma_root(struct anon_vma *root)
> > > -{
> > > -       if (root)
> > > -               up_write(&root->rwsem);
> > > -}
> > > -
> > >  static void check_anon_vma_clone(struct vm_area_struct *dst,
> > >                                  struct vm_area_struct *src)
> > >  {
> > > @@ -310,26 +284,28 @@ static void cleanup_partial_anon_vmas(struct vm_area_struct *vma);
> > >  int anon_vma_clone(struct vm_area_struct *dst, struct vm_area_struct *src)
> > >  {
> > >         struct anon_vma_chain *avc, *pavc;
> > > -       struct anon_vma *root = NULL;
> > >
> > >         check_anon_vma_clone(dst, src);
> > >
> > >         if (!src->anon_vma)
> > >                 return 0;
> > >
> > > +       check_anon_vma_clone(dst, src);
> >
> > check_anon_vma_clone() was already called 4 lines above. I'm guessing
> > this was accidentally carried over from the previous version?
> >
>
> Yeah I don't know why this is here, in the tree it isn't, maybe Andrew noticed
> and elided? :)

I noticed when reviewing later patches that you remove this extra call
in one of them. That's why the current tree is fine.

>
> But yeah the check above is correct so current in-tree state is correct.
>
> Thanks, Lorenzo