Re: Fwd: Memory corruption in multithreaded user space program while calling fork

[Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>]

On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 9:14 AM Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 8:49 AM Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 5 Jul 2023 10:51:57 +0200 "Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)" <regressions@leemhuis.info> wrote:
> >
> > > >>> I'm in wait-a-few-days-mode on this.  To see if we have a backportable
> > > >>> fix rather than disabling the feature in -stable.
> > >
> > > Andrew, how long will you remain in "wait-a-few-days-mode"? Given what
> > > Greg said below and that we already had three reports I know of I'd
> > > prefer if we could fix this rather sooner than later in mainline --
> > > especially as Arch Linux and openSUSE Tumbleweed likely have switched to
> > > 6.4.y already or will do so soon.
> >
> > I'll send today's 2-patch series to Linus today or tomorrow.
>
> I need to make a correction to the patch fixing the issue (the first
> one in the series) and will post it within an hour. Thanks!

Corrected patch is posted at
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230705171213.2843068-2-surenb@google.com/.
The other patch is unchanged but I posted v3 of the entire patchset
anyway.
Andrew, could you please replace the old version with this one before
sending it to Linus?
Thanks,
Suren.