From: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
shuah@kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team <kernel-team@android.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm: drop oom code from exit_mmap
Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 13:59:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJuCfpGw0nfxwY0pLMW9P4fhV7qKf3DejDgH+19Bj+v30-r4pQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YnrQ11iou9bwN9tY@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 1:53 PM Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue 10-05-22 09:31:50, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 6:06 AM Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon 09-05-22 20:00:13, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > > > With the oom-killer being able to operate on locked pages, exit_mmap
> > > > does not need to ensure that oom_reap_task_mm is done before it can
> > > > proceed. Instead it can rely on mmap_lock write lock to prevent
> > > > oom-killer from operating on the vma tree while it's freeing page
> > > > tables. exit_mmap can hold mmap_lock read lock when unmapping vmas
> > > > and then take mmap_lock write lock before freeing page tables.
> > >
> > > The changelog is rather light on nasty details which might be good but
> > > for the sake of our future us let's be more verbose so that we do not
> > > have to reinvent the prior history each time we are looking into this
> > > code. I would go with something like this instead:
> > > "
> > > The primary reason to invoke the oom reaper from the exit_mmap path used
> > > to be a prevention of an excessive oom killing if the oom victim exit
> > > races with the oom reaper (see 212925802454 ("mm: oom: let oom_reap_task
> > > and exit_mmap run concurrently") for more details. The invocation has
> > > moved around since then because of the interaction with the munlock
> > > logic but the underlying reason has remained the same (see 27ae357fa82b
> > > ("mm, oom: fix concurrent munlock and oom reaper unmap, v3").
> > >
> > > Munlock code is no longer a problem since a213e5cf71cb ("mm/munlock:
> > > delete munlock_vma_pages_all(), allow oomreap") and there shouldn't be
> > > any blocking operation before the memory is unmapped by exit_mmap so
> > > the oom reaper invocation can be dropped. The unmapping part can be done
> > > with the non-exclusive mmap_sem and the exclusive one is only required
> > > when page tables are freed.
> > >
> > > Remove the oom_reaper from exit_mmap which will make the code easier to
> > > read. This is really unlikely to make any observable difference although
> > > some microbenchmarks could benefit from one less branch that needs to be
> > > evaluated even though it almost never is true.
> > > "
> >
> > Looks great! Thanks for collecting all the history. Will update the description.
>
> Please make sure you double check the story. This is mostly my
> recollection and brief reading through the said commits. I might
> misremember here and there.
Will do. Thanks!
> --
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-10 20:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-10 3:00 [PATCH 1/3] selftests: vm: add process_mrelease tests Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-05-10 3:00 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm: drop oom code from exit_mmap Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-05-10 13:05 ` Michal Hocko
2022-05-10 16:31 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-05-10 20:53 ` Michal Hocko
2022-05-10 20:59 ` Suren Baghdasaryan [this message]
2022-05-10 15:46 ` Shuah Khan
2022-05-10 16:35 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-05-10 3:00 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm: delete unused MMF_OOM_VICTIM flag Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-05-10 13:08 ` Michal Hocko
2022-05-16 2:46 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-05-10 15:51 ` Shuah Khan
2022-05-10 16:10 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-05-10 15:43 ` [PATCH 1/3] selftests: vm: add process_mrelease tests Shuah Khan
2022-05-10 16:29 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-05-10 16:35 ` Shuah Khan
2022-05-10 16:42 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJuCfpGw0nfxwY0pLMW9P4fhV7qKf3DejDgH+19Bj+v30-r4pQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=surenb@google.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox