linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
To: Hao Ge <hao.ge@linux.dev>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	 Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
	 Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	 Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>,
	 Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	 Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	 Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	 Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,  linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Hao Ge <gehao@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] mm/alloc_tag: add the CONFIG_ARCH_NEEDS_WEAK_PER_CPU macro when statically defining the percpu variable _shared_alloc_tag
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 12:21:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJuCfpGkUk5RXm-HDLB2mr_mRbSxPV+kx116FFBhyYsf6pXNCg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <099651f46b0b57f6c7890a64608dc7ca44df7764.1749779391.git.gehao@kylinos.cn>

On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 8:06 PM Hao Ge <hao.ge@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> From: Hao Ge <gehao@kylinos.cn>
>
> Recently discovered this entry while checking kallsyms on ARM64:
> ffff800083e509c0 D _shared_alloc_tag
>
> If CONFIG_ARCH_NEEDS_WEAK_PER_CPU is not defined(it is only defined for
> s390 and alpha architectures),there's no need to statically define
> the percpu variable _shared_alloc_tag. As the number of CPUs
> increases,the wasted memory will grow correspondingly.

I don't think this patch needs all this background. Just say that
_shared_alloc_tag is not used when CONFIG_ARCH_NEEDS_WEAK_PER_CPU=n,
so you want to compile it out.

>
> Enclose the definition of _shared_alloc_tag within the
> CONFIG_ARCH_NEEDS_WEAK_PER_CPU condition.
>
> Suggested-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hao Ge <gehao@kylinos.cn>
> ---
>  lib/alloc_tag.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/alloc_tag.c b/lib/alloc_tag.c
> index c7f602fa7b23..14fd66f26e42 100644
> --- a/lib/alloc_tag.c
> +++ b/lib/alloc_tag.c
> @@ -24,8 +24,10 @@ static bool mem_profiling_support;
>
>  static struct codetag_type *alloc_tag_cttype;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_NEEDS_WEAK_PER_CPU
>  DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct alloc_tag_counters, _shared_alloc_tag);
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(_shared_alloc_tag);
> +#endif
>
>  DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_MAYBE(CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING_ENABLED_BY_DEFAULT,
>                         mem_alloc_profiling_key);
> --
> 2.25.1
>


  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-13 19:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-13  3:05 [PATCH v2 0/3] mm: Restrict the static definition of the per-CPU variable _shared_alloc_tag to s390 and alpha architectures only Hao Ge
2025-06-13  3:05 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] mm/Kconfig: add ARCH_NEEDS_WEAK_PER_CPU Option and enable it for s390/alpha Hao Ge
2025-06-13  3:05 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] mm: replace ARCH_NEEDS_WEAK_PER_CPU with MODULE_NEEDS_WEAK_PER_CPU Hao Ge
2025-06-13  3:05 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] mm/alloc_tag: add the CONFIG_ARCH_NEEDS_WEAK_PER_CPU macro when statically defining the percpu variable _shared_alloc_tag Hao Ge
2025-06-13 19:21   ` Suren Baghdasaryan [this message]
2025-06-13 19:19 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] mm: Restrict the static definition of the per-CPU variable _shared_alloc_tag to s390 and alpha architectures only Suren Baghdasaryan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJuCfpGkUk5RXm-HDLB2mr_mRbSxPV+kx116FFBhyYsf6pXNCg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dennis@kernel.org \
    --cc=gehao@kylinos.cn \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hao.ge@linux.dev \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=mattst88@gmail.com \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox