From: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Cc: ranxiaokai627@163.com, vbabka@suse.cz, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
david@kernel.org, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com,
Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, rppt@kernel.org, mhocko@suse.com,
corbet@lwn.net, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH] alloc_tag: remove sysctl prefix from mem_profiling boot parameter
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 09:00:01 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJuCfpGABfhi+KiZ9X1pcjby+YZW+FfMfGgc0pfXvUBN88xdGw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJuCfpGo4wYcMChX_xJJ04pHYKJ8vMPrkN9GFxXhW-1xQEmfiQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Jan 11, 2026 at 11:50 AM Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2026 at 6:34 PM Kent Overstreet
> <kent.overstreet@linux.dev> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 09, 2026 at 06:24:19AM +0000, ranxiaokai627@163.com wrote:
> > > From: Ran Xiaokai <ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn>
> > >
> > > Boot parameters prefixed with "sysctl." are processed separately
> > > during the final stage of system initialization via kernel_init()->
> > > do_sysctl_args(). Since mem_profiling support should be parsed
> > > in early boot stage, it is unsuitable for centralized handling
> > > in do_sysctl_args().
> > > Also, when CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING_DEBUG is enabled,
> > > the sysctl.vm.mem_profiling entry is not writable and will cause
> > > a warning. To prevent duplicate processing of sysctl.vm.mem_profiling,
> > > rename the boot parameter to "mem_profiling".
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ran Xiaokai <ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn>
> >
> > How was this observed/detected?
> >
> > My reading of early_param() would seem to indicate that
> > setup_early_mem_profiling() is getting called at the appropriate time -
> > and then additionally a second time by do_sysctl_args(), which then
> > becomes a noop.
> >
> > So the only bug would seem to be that the sysctl is not writeable in
> > debug mode? There's an easier fix for that one...
>
> Sorry for the delay.
> That's not a bug. We want this sysctrl to be read-only when the debug
> option is enabled. Otherwise if user toggles mem_profiling sysctrl off
> and then on again, all allocations that were made between these events
> will be missing their tags and our debug mechanism will generate
> warnings for each such occurrence when freeing these allocations.
> I'll look closer into this warning. Maybe we can suppress it when the
> read-only sysctrl is already set to the value being assigned to it?
I think the easiest way to fix this warning is to detect when the
modification is being done by do_sysctl_args() and return success, as
it's a no-op anyway (the same value was already assigned via
early_param). Something like this:
static int proc_mem_profiling_handler(const struct ctl_table *table, int write,
void *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
{
- if (!mem_profiling_support && write)
- return -EINVAL;
+ if (write) {
+#ifdef CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING_DEBUG
+ /* User can't toggle profiling while debugging */
+ if (current->mm)
+ return -EACCES;
+
+ /*
+ * Call from do_sysctl_args() which is a no-op since the same
+ * value was already set by setup_early_mem_profiling.
+ * Return success to avoid warnings from do_sysctl_args().
+ */
+ return 0;
+#endif
+ if (!mem_profiling_support)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
return proc_do_static_key(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
}
@@ -787,11 +801,7 @@ static const struct ctl_table
memory_allocation_profiling_sysctls[] = {
{
.procname = "mem_profiling",
.data = &mem_alloc_profiling_key,
-#ifdef CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING_DEBUG
- .mode = 0444,
-#else
.mode = 0644,
-#endif
.proc_handler = proc_mem_profiling_handler,
},
};
WDYT?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-12 17:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-09 6:24 ranxiaokai627
2026-01-11 2:12 ` Andrew Morton
2026-01-11 2:33 ` Kent Overstreet
2026-01-11 19:50 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-01-12 17:00 ` Suren Baghdasaryan [this message]
2026-01-13 3:27 ` ranxiaokai627
2026-01-13 3:50 ` Kent Overstreet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJuCfpGABfhi+KiZ9X1pcjby+YZW+FfMfGgc0pfXvUBN88xdGw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=surenb@google.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn \
--cc=ranxiaokai627@163.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox