Re: [PATCH v2] kho: init alloc tags when restoring pages from reserved memory

[Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>]

On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 8:55 AM Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Ran,
>
> On Tue, Jan 13 2026, ranxiaokai627@163.com wrote:
>
> > From: Ran Xiaokai <ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn>
> >
> > Memblock pages (including reserved memory) should have their allocation
> > tags initialized to CODETAG_EMPTY via clear_page_tag_ref() before being
> > released to the page allocator. When kho restores pages through
> > kho_restore_page(), missing this call causes mismatched
> > allocation/deallocation tracking and below warning message:
> > alloc_tag was not set
> > WARNING: include/linux/alloc_tag.h:164 at ___free_pages+0xb8/0x260, CPU#1: swapper/0/1
> > RIP: 0010:___free_pages+0xb8/0x260
> >  kho_restore_vmalloc+0x187/0x2e0
> >  kho_test_init+0x3c4/0xa30
> >  do_one_initcall+0x62/0x2b0
> >  kernel_init_freeable+0x25b/0x480
> >  kernel_init+0x1a/0x1c0
> >  ret_from_fork+0x2d1/0x360
> >
> > Add missing clear_page_tag_ref() annotation in kho_restore_page() to
> > fix this.
> >
> > Fixes: fc33e4b44b27 ("kexec: enable KHO support for memory preservation")
> > Signed-off-by: Ran Xiaokai <ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn>
> > Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
> > ---
> >  kernel/liveupdate/kexec_handover.c | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/liveupdate/kexec_handover.c b/kernel/liveupdate/kexec_handover.c
> > index cd6b3fb9dcae..2d47f2c50bd8 100644
> > --- a/kernel/liveupdate/kexec_handover.c
> > +++ b/kernel/liveupdate/kexec_handover.c
> > @@ -268,6 +268,7 @@ static struct page *kho_restore_page(phys_addr_t phys, bool is_folio)
> >       else
> >               kho_init_pages(page, nr_pages);
> >
> > +     clear_page_tag_ref(page);
>
> You are only clearing the tag for the head page. The tail pages are
> still un-initialized. Is that intentional?

In the case of a compound page we set the tag only on the head page,
so this is correct.

>
> What about non-compound pages (the ones you get from
> kho_restore_pages(), aka when is_folio is false)? Do we need to clear
> the tag on all pages in that case?

In the case of kho_restore_pages() we call split_page() which calls
pgalloc_tag_split() and that propagates the tag from the head page to
all the tail pages being split from it. However now that I'm looking
at it, I'm not sure pgalloc_tag_split() works correctly if the tag
reference of the head page is CODETAG_EMPTY. In summary, this patch is
fine but there might be a bug inside pgalloc_tag_split() if the tag
reference is CODETAG_EMPTY.

I'll analyze and reproduce that case. If it indeed has the issue I
think it's easy to fix it by creating a specialized alloc_tag object
with alloc_tag->ct=CODETAG_EMPTY and  make __pgalloc_tag_get() return
it if the page's tag reference is CODETAG_EMPTY.

>
> >       adjust_managed_page_count(page, nr_pages);
> >       return page;
> >  }