From: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: kent.overstreet@linux.dev, vbabka@suse.cz,
pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, souravpanda@google.com,
keescook@chromium.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm: handle profiling for fake memory allocations during compaction
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 20:50:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJuCfpEd4Rnd=5hMk4N_Q9Gg4e3mSfioJAsqufvzOeN01aRpbg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240614181950.d5cd06acba24339401c98d6d@linux-foundation.org>
On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 6:19 PM Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 14 Jun 2024 16:05:04 -0700 Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> wrote:
>
> > During compaction isolated free pages are marked allocated so that they
> > can be split and/or freed. For that, post_alloc_hook() is used inside
> > split_map_pages() and release_free_list(). split_map_pages() marks free
> > pages allocated, splits the pages and then lets alloc_contig_range_noprof()
> > free those pages. release_free_list() marks free pages and immediately
> > frees them. This usage of post_alloc_hook() affect memory allocation
> > profiling because these functions might not be called from an instrumented
> > allocator, therefore current->alloc_tag is NULL and when debugging is
> > enabled (CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING_DEBUG=y) that causes warnings.
>
> It would be helpful to quote the warnings for the changelog. And a
> Reported-by:/Closes: if appropriate.
This was not really reported anywhere but if someone hit this
condition (it requires compaction to be running) then the warning
would be generated.
>
> I'm assuming we want this in 6.10-rcX?
Yes please. Otherwise someone will report that they are getting this
warning when the system is under memory pressure and
CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING_DEBUG is enabled.
>
> Please help in identifying the Fixes:, for anyone who might be
> backporting allocation profiling.
I think we can mark it as
Fixes: b951aaff5035 ("mm: enable page allocation tagging")
but it's really a separate patch which covers a corner case.
Please let me know if you want me to send a v2 with this tag added.
Thanks,
Suren.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-15 3:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-14 23:05 Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-06-15 1:19 ` Andrew Morton
2024-06-15 3:50 ` Suren Baghdasaryan [this message]
2024-06-17 8:33 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-06-30 19:17 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-07-02 9:32 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-07-02 15:17 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJuCfpEd4Rnd=5hMk4N_Q9Gg4e3mSfioJAsqufvzOeN01aRpbg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=surenb@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=souravpanda@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox