Re: [PATCH v3] mm: cma: NUMA node interface

[Aslan Bakirov <aslanbekirov@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1329 bytes --]

On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 11:01 AM Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> wrote:

> On Fri 03-04-20 10:51:32, Aslan Bakirov wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 6:02 AM Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 07:12:56PM -0700, Aslan Bakirov wrote:
> > > > I've noticed that there is no interfaces exposed by CMA which would
> let
> > > me
> > > > to declare contigous memory on particular NUMA node.
> > > >
> > > > This patchset adds the ability to try to allocate contiguous memory
> on
> > > > specific node. It will fallback to other nodes if the specified one
> > > > doesn't work.
> > > >
> > > > Implement a new method for declaring contigous memory on particular
> node
> > > > and keep cma_declare_contiguous() as a wrapper.
> > >
> > > Is there an additional patch which uses this new interface?
> > >
> > > Generally the patch seems reasonable but we should have a user.
> >
> >
> >  Thanks for the comments. Yes, actually, this is the version 3 of first
> > patch ([PATCH 1/2] mm: cma: NUMA node interface)
> >  of patchset. Second patch, which uses this interface is  "[PATCH 2/2]
> mm:
> > hugetlb: Use node interface of cma"
>
> It would have been much more clear to send those two patches together as
> you can see.
>
Sincerely apologies, sent them again.


> --
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2096 bytes --]