linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@gmail.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Jaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@samsung.com>,
	 "senozhatsky@chromium.org" <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	 "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	GyeongHwan Hong <gh21.hong@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] vsprintf: compile error on %09pK
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2023 23:39:58 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJrd-Uvzy18SfjjqbqZCPHjw+ujQXsBpvov4b=bfAwZrj=bCAA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZCrMMQt2xnnZIyz6@alley>

2023년 4월 3일 (월) 오후 9:53, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>님이 작성:
>
> On Mon 2023-04-03 19:46:17, Jaewon Kim wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > I've just changed %09lx to %09pK on my driver code to hide the address, but I
> > faced compiler error. The %9pK without 0 worked.
>
> What exactly do you want to achieve, please?

Hello

Thank you for your comment.

I wanted to print phys_addr_t  type value only when kptr_restrict sysctl is
allowed. So I thought I could use %pK for that purpose. And the physical
address is not that long. I wanted to make that length short like 9 hex.

>
> Note that printk() hashes pointers by default. It means that %p does not
> print the value but a hash based on the value.
>
> If you print the same pointer twice, you will see the same hash, so
> you know that the pointer is the same. But you do not see the address
> so that you could not use the value for a security attack.
>
> See Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst
>
> Anyway, the main question if it makes sense to print the pointer value
> at all. The address is not useful if it can't be compared with
> other pointers or if the data on the address could not be checked.
>
> > Is there restriction on %pK which does now allow %0 ? I've wondered whether I
> > did wrong or it is a printk problem.
> >
> > To show easily I tried to add pr_info("%09pK\n", nodemask); in page_alloc.c
> > Then here's what I did.
> >
> > $ ARCH=x86 make x86_64_defconfig ; make mm/page_alloc.o
> > #
> > # No change to .config
> > #
> >   CALL    scripts/checksyscalls.sh
> >   DESCEND objtool
> >   INSTALL libsubcmd_headers
> >   CC      mm/page_alloc.o
> > In file included from ./include/asm-generic/bug.h:22:0,
> >                  from ./arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h:87,
> >                  from ./include/linux/bug.h:5,
> >                  from ./include/linux/mmdebug.h:5,
> >                  from ./include/linux/mm.h:6,
> >                  from mm/page_alloc.c:19:
> > mm/page_alloc.c: In function ‘__alloc_pages’:
> > ./include/linux/kern_levels.h:5:18: error: '0' flag used with ‘%p’ gnu_printf format [-Werror=format=]
> >  #define KERN_SOH "\001"  /* ASCII Start Of Header */
>
> As Sergey already wrote. %p does not support any modification flags.

Okay, then we can't use %09pK. I've just wondered because %9pK works.

BR
Jaewon Kim

>
> Best Regards,
> Petr


  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-03 14:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20230403104617epcms1p383bacbca705c0d7e4fffca6833050e42@epcms1p3>
2023-04-03 10:46 ` Jaewon Kim
2023-04-03 12:18   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2023-04-03 12:53   ` Petr Mladek
2023-04-03 14:39     ` Jaewon Kim [this message]
2023-04-03 15:34       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2023-04-03 16:04       ` David Laight
     [not found]       ` <CGME20230403104617epcms1p383bacbca705c0d7e4fffca6833050e42@epcms1p6>
2023-04-04 10:12         ` Jaewon Kim
2023-04-04 12:03           ` Petr Mladek
     [not found]           ` <CGME20230403104617epcms1p383bacbca705c0d7e4fffca6833050e42@epcms1p1>
2023-04-04 12:33             ` Jaewon Kim
     [not found]       ` <CGME20230403104617epcms1p383bacbca705c0d7e4fffca6833050e42@epcms1p5>
2023-04-04 10:16         ` Jaewon Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJrd-Uvzy18SfjjqbqZCPHjw+ujQXsBpvov4b=bfAwZrj=bCAA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=jaewon31.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=gh21.hong@samsung.com \
    --cc=jaewon31.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox