linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Mikhalitsyn <alexander@mihalicyn.com>
To: Andrei Vagin <avagin@google.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	 Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,  linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, criu@lists.linux.dev,
	 Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	 David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
	Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	 Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
	Michal Koutny <mkoutny@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mm: synchronize saved_auxv access with arg_lock
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2026 21:36:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJqdLrqFJm5s4qgczWUi50muoMbUm7tbDZ4vTp=3ktEDYoi7wA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260209190605.1564597-4-avagin@google.com>

Am Mo., 9. Feb. 2026 um 20:06 Uhr schrieb Andrei Vagin <avagin@google.com>:
>
> The mm->saved_auxv array stores the auxiliary vector, which can be
> modified via prctl(PR_SET_MM_AUXV) or prctl(PR_SET_MM_MAP). Previously,
> accesses to saved_auxv were not synchronized. This was a intentional
> trade-off, as the vector was only used to provide information to
> userspace via /proc/PID/auxv or prctl(PR_GET_AUXV), and consistency
> between the auxv values left to userspace.
>
> With the introduction of hardware capability (HWCAP) inheritance during
> execve, the kernel now relies on the contents of saved_auxv to configure
> the execution environment of new processes.  An unsynchronized read
> during execve could result in a new process inheriting an inconsistent
> set of capabilities if the parent process updates its auxiliary vector
> concurrently.
>
> While it is still not strictly required to guarantee the consistency of
> auxv values on the kernel side, doing so is relatively straightforward.
> This change implements synchronization using arg_lock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrei Vagin <avagin@google.com>

Reviewed-by: Alexander Mikhalitsyn <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@futurfusion.io>

> ---
>  fs/exec.c      |  8 ++++++--
>  fs/proc/base.c | 12 +++++++++---
>  kernel/fork.c  |  7 ++++++-
>  kernel/sys.c   | 29 ++++++++++++++---------------
>  4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
> index 7401efbe4ba0..d7e3ad8c8051 100644
> --- a/fs/exec.c
> +++ b/fs/exec.c
> @@ -1793,6 +1793,7 @@ static int bprm_execve(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
>
>  static void inherit_hwcap(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
>  {
> +       struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
>         int i, n;
>
>  #ifdef ELF_HWCAP4
> @@ -1805,10 +1806,12 @@ static void inherit_hwcap(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
>         n = 1;
>  #endif
>
> +       spin_lock(&mm->arg_lock);
>         for (i = 0; n && i < AT_VECTOR_SIZE; i += 2) {
> -               long val = current->mm->saved_auxv[i + 1];
> +               unsigned long type = mm->saved_auxv[i];
> +               unsigned long val = mm->saved_auxv[i + 1];
>
> -               switch (current->mm->saved_auxv[i]) {
> +               switch (type) {
>                 case AT_NULL:
>                         goto done;
>                 case AT_HWCAP:
> @@ -1835,6 +1838,7 @@ static void inherit_hwcap(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
>                 n--;
>         }
>  done:
> +       spin_unlock(&mm->arg_lock);
>         mm_flags_set(MMF_USER_HWCAP, bprm->mm);
>  }
>
> diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
> index 4eec684baca9..09d887741268 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/base.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/base.c
> @@ -1083,14 +1083,20 @@ static ssize_t auxv_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
>  {
>         struct mm_struct *mm = file->private_data;
>         unsigned int nwords = 0;
> +       unsigned long saved_auxv[AT_VECTOR_SIZE];
>
>         if (!mm)
>                 return 0;
> +
> +       spin_lock(&mm->arg_lock);
> +       memcpy(saved_auxv, mm->saved_auxv, sizeof(saved_auxv));
> +       spin_unlock(&mm->arg_lock);
> +
>         do {
>                 nwords += 2;
> -       } while (mm->saved_auxv[nwords - 2] != 0); /* AT_NULL */
> -       return simple_read_from_buffer(buf, count, ppos, mm->saved_auxv,
> -                                      nwords * sizeof(mm->saved_auxv[0]));
> +       } while (saved_auxv[nwords - 2] != 0); /* AT_NULL */
> +       return simple_read_from_buffer(buf, count, ppos, saved_auxv,
> +                                      nwords * sizeof(saved_auxv[0]));
>  }
>
>  static const struct file_operations proc_auxv_operations = {
> diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
> index 0091315643de..c0a3dd94df22 100644
> --- a/kernel/fork.c
> +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> @@ -1104,8 +1104,13 @@ static struct mm_struct *mm_init(struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *p,
>                 __mm_flags_overwrite_word(mm, mmf_init_legacy_flags(flags));
>                 mm->def_flags = current->mm->def_flags & VM_INIT_DEF_MASK;
>
> -               if (mm_flags_test(MMF_USER_HWCAP, current->mm))
> +               if (mm_flags_test(MMF_USER_HWCAP, current->mm)) {
> +                       spin_lock(&current->mm->arg_lock);
>                         mm_flags_set(MMF_USER_HWCAP, mm);
> +                       memcpy(mm->saved_auxv, current->mm->saved_auxv,
> +                              sizeof(mm->saved_auxv));

nit: I was looking for this memcpy(mm->saved_auxv,
current->mm->saved_auxv, sizeof(mm->saved_auxv)) while reviewing
a previous patch. Shouldn't it be there?

LGTM.

> +                       spin_unlock(&current->mm->arg_lock);
> +               }
>         } else {
>                 __mm_flags_overwrite_word(mm, default_dump_filter);
>                 mm->def_flags = 0;
> diff --git a/kernel/sys.c b/kernel/sys.c
> index 6fbd7be21a5f..eafb5f75cb5c 100644
> --- a/kernel/sys.c
> +++ b/kernel/sys.c
> @@ -2147,20 +2147,11 @@ static int prctl_set_mm_map(int opt, const void __user *addr, unsigned long data
>         mm->arg_end     = prctl_map.arg_end;
>         mm->env_start   = prctl_map.env_start;
>         mm->env_end     = prctl_map.env_end;
> -       spin_unlock(&mm->arg_lock);
> -
> -       /*
> -        * Note this update of @saved_auxv is lockless thus
> -        * if someone reads this member in procfs while we're
> -        * updating -- it may get partly updated results. It's
> -        * known and acceptable trade off: we leave it as is to
> -        * not introduce additional locks here making the kernel
> -        * more complex.
> -        */
>         if (prctl_map.auxv_size) {
> -               memcpy(mm->saved_auxv, user_auxv, sizeof(user_auxv));
>                 mm_flags_set(MMF_USER_HWCAP, current->mm);
> +               memcpy(mm->saved_auxv, user_auxv, sizeof(user_auxv));
>         }
> +       spin_unlock(&mm->arg_lock);
>
>         mmap_read_unlock(mm);
>         return 0;
> @@ -2190,10 +2181,10 @@ static int prctl_set_auxv(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
>
>         BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(user_auxv) != sizeof(mm->saved_auxv));
>
> -       task_lock(current);
> -       memcpy(mm->saved_auxv, user_auxv, len);
> +       spin_lock(&mm->arg_lock);
>         mm_flags_set(MMF_USER_HWCAP, current->mm);
> -       task_unlock(current);
> +       memcpy(mm->saved_auxv, user_auxv, len);
> +       spin_unlock(&mm->arg_lock);
>
>         return 0;
>  }
> @@ -2466,9 +2457,17 @@ static inline int prctl_get_mdwe(unsigned long arg2, unsigned long arg3,
>  static int prctl_get_auxv(void __user *addr, unsigned long len)
>  {
>         struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
> +       unsigned long auxv[AT_VECTOR_SIZE];
>         unsigned long size = min_t(unsigned long, sizeof(mm->saved_auxv), len);
>
> -       if (size && copy_to_user(addr, mm->saved_auxv, size))
> +       if (!size)
> +               return sizeof(mm->saved_auxv);
> +
> +       spin_lock(&mm->arg_lock);
> +       memcpy(auxv, mm->saved_auxv, size);
> +       spin_unlock(&mm->arg_lock);
> +
> +       if (copy_to_user(addr, auxv, size))
>                 return -EFAULT;
>         return sizeof(mm->saved_auxv);
>  }
> --
> 2.53.0.239.g8d8fc8a987-goog
>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-02-10 20:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-09 19:06 [PATCH 0/4 v3] exec: inherit HWCAPs from the parent process Andrei Vagin
2026-02-09 19:06 ` [PATCH 1/4] binfmt_elf_fdpic: fix AUXV size calculation for ELF_HWCAP3 and ELF_HWCAP4 Andrei Vagin
2026-02-10 19:59   ` Alexander Mikhalitsyn
2026-02-09 19:06 ` [PATCH 2/4] exec: inherit HWCAPs from the parent process Andrei Vagin
2026-02-10 20:13   ` Alexander Mikhalitsyn
2026-02-12 23:49   ` Kees Cook
2026-02-09 19:06 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm: synchronize saved_auxv access with arg_lock Andrei Vagin
2026-02-10  9:48   ` Michal Koutný
2026-02-10 20:36   ` Alexander Mikhalitsyn [this message]
2026-02-11  1:08     ` Andrei Vagin
2026-02-12 23:53   ` Kees Cook
2026-02-09 19:06 ` [PATCH 4/4] selftests/exec: add test for HWCAP inheritance Andrei Vagin
2026-02-10 20:37   ` Alexander Mikhalitsyn
2026-02-12 23:57   ` Kees Cook
2026-02-10 19:28 ` [PATCH 0/4 v3] exec: inherit HWCAPs from the parent process Cyrill Gorcunov
2026-02-17 18:01 [PATCH 0/4 v4] " Andrei Vagin
2026-02-17 18:01 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm: synchronize saved_auxv access with arg_lock Andrei Vagin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJqdLrqFJm5s4qgczWUi50muoMbUm7tbDZ4vTp=3ktEDYoi7wA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=alexander@mihalicyn.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=avagin@google.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=chenridong@huawei.com \
    --cc=criu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox