From: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
To: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: miklos@szeredi.hu, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
josef@toxicpanda.com, bernd.schubert@fastmail.fm,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, shakeel.butt@linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org,
kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] fuse: remove tmp folio for writebacks and internal rb tree
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 13:29:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJnrk1b9Ts-ve3A2O2tzsQ3R36mXmyLoHFiNOv961TpzHD_QDg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0ba71b33-71ca-4dc0-a01b-7744933ae6d4@linux.alibaba.com>
On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 2:24 AM Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 10/15/24 2:22 AM, Joanne Koong wrote:
> > static void fuse_writepage_args_page_fill(struct fuse_writepage_args *wpa, struct folio *folio,
> > - struct folio *tmp_folio, uint32_t page_index)
> > + uint32_t page_index)
> > {
> > struct inode *inode = folio->mapping->host;
> > struct fuse_args_pages *ap = &wpa->ia.ap;
> >
> > - folio_copy(tmp_folio, folio);
> > -
> > - ap->pages[page_index] = &tmp_folio->page;
> > + folio_get(folio);
>
> Why folio_get() is needed?
>
It's not strictly needed but I added this to ensure that the folio
will always be valid when we later on access it. My understanding is
that it's an implementation detail rather than a guarantee that the
folio can't be removed from the mapping until writeback finishes.
>
> >
> > @@ -2203,68 +2047,11 @@ static void fuse_writepages_send(struct fuse_fill_wb_data *data)
> > struct fuse_writepage_args *wpa = data->wpa;
> > struct inode *inode = data->inode;
> > struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode);
> > - int num_pages = wpa->ia.ap.num_pages;
> > - int i;
> >
> > spin_lock(&fi->lock);
> > list_add_tail(&wpa->queue_entry, &fi->queued_writes);
>
> Could we also drop fi->queued_writes list and writectr counter after we
> dropping the temp folio? I'm not sure. When I grep all callsites of
> fuse_set_nowrite(), it seems that apart from the direct IO
> path(fuse_direct_io -> fuse_sync_writes), the truncation related code
> also relies on this writectr mechanism.
I'm not sure either, but I think we still need it. My understanding is
that the main purpose of this writectr is to detect when the inode has
pending writebacks. I think even without the temporary pages, we still
would need a way overall to track if the inode is writing back any
folio in its mapping.
Thanks,
Joanne
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Jingbo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-18 20:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-14 18:22 [PATCH v2 0/2] fuse: remove extra page copies in writeback Joanne Koong
2024-10-14 18:22 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mm: skip reclaiming folios in writeback contexts that may trigger deadlock Joanne Koong
2024-10-14 18:38 ` Shakeel Butt
2024-10-14 21:04 ` Joanne Koong
2024-10-14 23:57 ` Shakeel Butt
2024-10-15 16:59 ` Joanne Koong
2024-10-14 18:22 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] fuse: remove tmp folio for writebacks and internal rb tree Joanne Koong
2024-10-15 10:01 ` Miklos Szeredi
2024-10-15 17:06 ` Joanne Koong
2024-10-15 19:17 ` Shakeel Butt
2024-10-16 9:44 ` Jingbo Xu
2024-10-16 9:57 ` Miklos Szeredi
2024-10-16 9:51 ` Miklos Szeredi
2024-10-16 17:52 ` Shakeel Butt
2024-10-16 18:37 ` Miklos Szeredi
2024-10-16 21:27 ` Shakeel Butt
2024-10-17 13:31 ` Miklos Szeredi
2024-10-18 5:31 ` Shakeel Butt
2024-10-21 10:15 ` Miklos Szeredi
2024-10-21 17:01 ` Shakeel Butt
2024-10-22 15:03 ` Miklos Szeredi
2024-10-21 21:05 ` Joanne Koong
2024-10-24 16:54 ` Joanne Koong
2024-10-25 1:38 ` Jingbo Xu
2024-10-25 15:32 ` Miklos Szeredi
2024-10-25 17:36 ` Joanne Koong
2024-10-25 18:02 ` Miklos Szeredi
2024-10-25 18:19 ` Joanne Koong
2024-10-28 2:02 ` Jingbo Xu
2024-10-25 18:47 ` Joanne Koong
2024-10-28 2:28 ` Jingbo Xu
2024-10-28 21:57 ` Joanne Koong
2024-10-25 22:40 ` Joanne Koong
2024-10-28 21:58 ` Joanne Koong
2024-10-30 9:32 ` Bernd Schubert
2024-10-30 16:04 ` Joanne Koong
2024-10-30 16:21 ` Bernd Schubert
2024-10-30 17:02 ` Joanne Koong
2024-10-30 17:27 ` Bernd Schubert
2024-10-30 17:35 ` Joanne Koong
2024-10-30 21:56 ` Shakeel Butt
2024-10-30 22:17 ` Bernd Schubert
2024-10-30 22:51 ` Joanne Koong
2024-10-31 0:30 ` Shakeel Butt
2024-10-31 19:06 ` Joanne Koong
2024-10-31 20:06 ` Shakeel Butt
2024-10-31 21:52 ` Joanne Koong
2024-10-31 22:38 ` Shakeel Butt
2024-11-06 23:37 ` Joanne Koong
2024-11-06 23:56 ` Shakeel Butt
2024-11-01 11:44 ` Jingbo Xu
2024-11-01 20:54 ` Joanne Koong
2024-11-04 8:09 ` Jingbo Xu
2024-10-29 22:04 ` Bernd Schubert
2024-10-16 9:56 ` Jingbo Xu
2024-10-16 10:00 ` Miklos Szeredi
2024-10-18 1:30 ` Joanne Koong
2024-10-18 5:57 ` Shakeel Butt
2024-10-18 19:57 ` Joanne Koong
2024-10-18 20:46 ` Shakeel Butt
2024-10-21 9:32 ` Miklos Szeredi
2024-10-18 9:24 ` Jingbo Xu
2024-10-18 20:29 ` Joanne Koong [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJnrk1b9Ts-ve3A2O2tzsQ3R36mXmyLoHFiNOv961TpzHD_QDg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=joannelkoong@gmail.com \
--cc=bernd.schubert@fastmail.fm \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox