From: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
To: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "mm: vmscan: fix misused nr_reclaimed in shrink_mem_cgroup_zone()"
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 23:00:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJd=RBD6Sb4zmUkMTaT12cgwFLAQYmh6HuK1hLMa_Dda6FHBLQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1334000524-23972-1-git-send-email-yinghan@google.com>
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 3:42 AM, Ying Han <yinghan@google.com> wrote:
> This reverts commit c38446cc65e1f2b3eb8630c53943b94c4f65f670.
>
> Before the commit, the code makes senses to me but not after the commit. The
> "nr_reclaimed" is the number of pages reclaimed by scanning through the memcg's
> lru lists. The "nr_to_reclaim" is the target value for the whole function. For
> example, we like to early break the reclaim if reclaimed 32 pages under direct
> reclaim (not DEF_PRIORITY).
>
> After the reverted commit, the target "nr_to_reclaim" is decremented each time
> by "nr_reclaimed" but we still use it to compare the "nr_reclaimed". It just
> doesn't make sense to me...
>
I downloaded mm/vmscan.c from the next tree a couple minutes ago, and
see
.nr_to_reclaim = SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX,
and
nr_reclaimed = do_try_to_free_pages(zonelist, &sc, &shrink);
in try_to_free_pages().
I also see
total_scanned += sc->nr_scanned;
if (sc->nr_reclaimed >= sc->nr_to_reclaim)
goto out;
in do_try_to_free_pages(),
then would you please say a few words about the sense
of the check of nr_to_reclaim?
> Signed-off-by: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
> ---
> mm/vmscan.c | 7 +------
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 33c332b..1a51868 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -2107,12 +2107,7 @@ restart:
> * with multiple processes reclaiming pages, the total
> * freeing target can get unreasonably large.
> */
> - if (nr_reclaimed >= nr_to_reclaim)
> - nr_to_reclaim = 0;
> - else
> - nr_to_reclaim -= nr_reclaimed;
> -
> - if (!nr_to_reclaim && priority < DEF_PRIORITY)
> + if (nr_reclaimed >= nr_to_reclaim && priority < DEF_PRIORITY)
> break;
> }
> blk_finish_plug(&plug);
> --
> 1.7.7.3
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-10 15:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-09 19:42 Ying Han
2012-04-09 19:50 ` Andrew Morton
2012-04-09 21:23 ` Ying Han
2012-04-09 22:29 ` Ying Han
2012-04-09 23:24 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-04-10 0:04 ` Andrew Morton
2012-04-10 15:00 ` Hillf Danton [this message]
2012-04-10 15:16 ` Hillf Danton
2012-04-10 16:44 ` Ying Han
2012-04-11 11:55 ` Hillf Danton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJd=RBD6Sb4zmUkMTaT12cgwFLAQYmh6HuK1hLMa_Dda6FHBLQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=dhillf@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=yinghan@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox