From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx201.postini.com [74.125.245.201]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F40566B005C for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 07:14:53 -0500 (EST) Received: by wics10 with SMTP id s10so433167wic.14 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 04:14:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20120110165743.GE4118@suse.de> References: <20120110094026.GB4118@suse.de> <20120110165743.GE4118@suse.de> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 20:14:52 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: vmscan: no change of reclaim mode if unevictable page encountered From: Hillf Danton Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Mel Gorman Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , David Rientjes , Andrew Morton , LKML On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Mel Gorman wrote: > > When I said it needed more justification, I meant that you need to show > a workload or usecase that suffers as a result of reset_reclaim_mode > being called here. I explained already that the reset errs on the > side of caution by making reclaim work less. > > You need to describe what problem your workload is suffering from and > why this patch fixes it. > Got and thanks for review /Hillf -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org