From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68A8BC3F68F for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 16:14:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 309A52087F for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 16:14:23 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 309A52087F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id B14446B0006; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 11:14:22 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id AC5FB6B0007; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 11:14:22 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 9B4DA6B0008; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 11:14:22 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0142.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.142]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 854B46B0006 for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 11:14:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin17.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2BA85180AD806 for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 16:14:22 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76423911564.17.help23_6048e3825c61e X-HE-Tag: help23_6048e3825c61e X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2978 Received: from mail-oi1-f194.google.com (mail-oi1-f194.google.com [209.85.167.194]) by imf41.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 16:14:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi1-f194.google.com with SMTP id i1so7143806oie.8 for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 08:14:21 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8uD0o49IbMRAvqS+Di3/m9AqswAC6Wc0AWjFfbWqxI4=; b=mJK0Xek5NnH6jRF1Si1Pznu6PSKa+1FNi9rMKNCoBHX2NbBgLzKJzbfQAOiAphYA9o TWPUlUtba7imm/3H6EwCrU97OyNfrXzDu3AYCm8munjeuvEf1dLcCE1jhPULu3GrmUbx soKs+PBtDIWFUdyLWpl+q8xjB/XQBlBNBmn0mQN6LpkmbL78a8B3+n88lIYq4xk25Llg HRxbsC9K01wu7e9fgxsv9RxqvASwjvld4KmbECkwCxKBMiaSuTR0+g2DIXMEPC/zBNZb 8CkM6fR2t8likRUlM+UyAI337gBzH9pQUbm+VhnzV0n5Sa/tlkGOvUs9DHJGevmnyfep NwgQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWunnmeI4wY5XdChRGy7+HWhvhaBlGQ5jJ/kXCSY76m1ecKsh+b f+tQi/jBJfWIfHmeYueweZZ6QbXfU2zLVlDKFBU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwdHNWixHg7Y+/wZBUzMNgH0rf9wyugpmljHpUiTcmpA31YdcaK3nx5hscQ2lXHBD4KgXIfemOn8RlsaK8/5XQ= X-Received: by 2002:a54:4e96:: with SMTP id c22mr8087925oiy.110.1580141660938; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 08:14:20 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191226220205.128664-1-semenzato@google.com> <20191226220205.128664-2-semenzato@google.com> <20200106125352.GB9198@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20200108114952.GR32178@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20200127141637.GL1183@dhcp22.suse.cz> In-Reply-To: <20200127141637.GL1183@dhcp22.suse.cz> From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2020 17:14:09 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: clarify limitations of hibernation To: Michal Hocko Cc: Luigi Semenzato , Linux Memory Management List , linux-kernel , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Andrew Morton , Geoff Pike Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 3:16 PM Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Fri 24-01-20 08:37:12, Luigi Semenzato wrote: > [...] > > The purpose of my documentation patch was to make it clearer that > > hibernation may fail in situations in which suspend-to-RAM works; for > > instance, when there is no swap, and anonymous pages are over 50% of > > total RAM. I will send a new version of the patch which hopefully > > makes this clearer. > > I was under impression that s2disk is pretty much impossible without any > swap. And you were correct. :-)