From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <owner-linux-mm@kvack.org>
Received: from mail-it0-f70.google.com (mail-it0-f70.google.com [209.85.214.70])
	by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B9A96B0003
	for <linux-mm@kvack.org>; Wed,  4 Apr 2018 12:03:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by mail-it0-f70.google.com with SMTP id u15-v6so19608615ita.8
        for <linux-mm@kvack.org>; Wed, 04 Apr 2018 09:03:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-sor-f65.google.com (mail-sor-f65.google.com. [209.85.220.65])
        by mx.google.com with SMTPS id 201-v6sor444258iti.33.2018.04.04.09.03.48
        for <linux-mm@kvack.org>
        (Google Transport Security);
        Wed, 04 Apr 2018 09:03:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180404120002.6561a5bc@gandalf.local.home>
References: <20180404115310.6c69e7b9@gandalf.local.home> <20180404120002.6561a5bc@gandalf.local.home>
From: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 09:03:47 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJWu+orC-1JDYHDTQU+DFckGq5ZnXBCCq9wLG-gNK0Nc4-vo7w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ring-buffer: Add set/clear_current_oom_origin() during allocations
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org
List-ID: <linux-mm.kvack.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>, Zhaoyang Huang <huangzhaoyang@gmail.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, kernel-patch-test@lists.linaro.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, "open list:MEMORY MANAGEMENT" <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>

On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 9:00 AM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Apr 2018 11:53:10 -0400
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
>
>> @@ -1162,35 +1163,60 @@ static int rb_check_pages(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer)
>>  static int __rb_allocate_pages(long nr_pages, struct list_head *pages, int cpu)
>>  {
>>       struct buffer_page *bpage, *tmp;
>> +     bool user_thread = current->mm != NULL;
>> +     gfp_t mflags;
>>       long i;
>>
>> -     /* Check if the available memory is there first */
>> +     /*
>> +      * Check if the available memory is there first.
>> +      * Note, si_mem_available() only gives us a rough estimate of available
>> +      * memory. It may not be accurate. But we don't care, we just want
>> +      * to prevent doing any allocation when it is obvious that it is
>> +      * not going to succeed.
>> +      */
>
> In case you are wondering how I tested this, I simply added:
>
> #if 0
>>       i = si_mem_available();
>>       if (i < nr_pages)
>>               return -ENOMEM;
> #endif
>
> for the tests. Note, without this, I tried to allocate all memory
> (bisecting it with allocations that failed and allocations that
> succeeded), and couldn't trigger an OOM :-/

I guess you need to have something *else* other than the write to
buffer_size_kb doing the GFP_KERNEL allocations but unfortunately gets
OOM killed?

Also, I agree with the new patch and its nice idea to do that.

thanks,

- Joel