From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io0-f198.google.com (mail-io0-f198.google.com [209.85.223.198]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 536A76B0003 for ; Wed, 4 Apr 2018 12:18:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-io0-f198.google.com with SMTP id r69so19935994ioe.20 for ; Wed, 04 Apr 2018 09:18:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-sor-f41.google.com (mail-sor-f41.google.com. [209.85.220.41]) by mx.google.com with SMTPS id i33sor2316452ioo.58.2018.04.04.09.18.47 for (Google Transport Security); Wed, 04 Apr 2018 09:18:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180404121326.6eca4fa3@gandalf.local.home> References: <20180404115310.6c69e7b9@gandalf.local.home> <20180404120002.6561a5bc@gandalf.local.home> <20180404121326.6eca4fa3@gandalf.local.home> From: Joel Fernandes Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 09:18:45 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] ring-buffer: Add set/clear_current_oom_origin() during allocations Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Steven Rostedt Cc: LKML , Michal Hocko , Zhaoyang Huang , Ingo Molnar , kernel-patch-test@lists.linaro.org, Andrew Morton , "open list:MEMORY MANAGEMENT" , Vlastimil Babka On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 9:13 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote: [..] >> >> Also, I agree with the new patch and its nice idea to do that. > > Thanks, want to give it a test too? Sure, I'll try it in a few hours. I am thinking of trying some of the memory pressure tools we have. Likely by noon or so once I look at some day job things :-D thanks, - Joel