From: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
linux-man@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] ioctl_userfaultfd.2: document new UFFDIO_POISON ioctl
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 10:13:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJHvVcg8CDoXTjuWiABy8Mu-fwFmb6fVgHNXWwS=GVFNPx8j+g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231009090951.GM3303@kernel.org>
On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 2:10 AM Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 12:02:06PM -0700, Axel Rasmussen wrote:
> > This is a new feature recently added to the kernel. So, document the new
> > ioctl the same way we do other UFFDIO_* ioctls.
> >
> > Also note the corresponding new ioctl flag we can return in reponse to a
> > UFFDIO_REGISTER call.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
>
> With a small correction
>
> Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
>
> > ---
> > man2/ioctl_userfaultfd.2 | 112 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 112 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/man2/ioctl_userfaultfd.2 b/man2/ioctl_userfaultfd.2
> > index afe3caffc..1282f63e1 100644
> > --- a/man2/ioctl_userfaultfd.2
> > +++ b/man2/ioctl_userfaultfd.2
> > @@ -405,6 +405,11 @@ operation is supported.
> > The
> > .B UFFDIO_CONTINUE
> > operation is supported.
> > +.TP
> > +.B 1 << _UFFDIO_POISON
> > +The
> > +.B UFFDIO_POISON
> > +operation is supported.
> > .PP
> > This
> > .BR ioctl (2)
> > @@ -916,6 +921,113 @@ The faulting process has exited at the time of a
> > .B UFFDIO_CONTINUE
> > operation.
> > .\"
> > +.SS UFFDIO_POISON
> > +(Since Linux 6.6.)
> > +Mark an address range as "poisoned".
> > +Future accesses to these addresses will raise a
> > +.B SIGBUS
> > +signal.
> > +Unlike
> > +.B MADV_HWPOISON
> > +this works by installing page table entries,
> > +rather than "really" poisoning the underlying physical pages.
> > +This means it only affects this particular address space.
> > +.PP
> > +The
> > +.I argp
> > +argument is a pointer to a
> > +.I uffdio_continue
>
> Did you mean uffdio_poison?
Ah, yes. :) Should have copy/pasted more carefully. I can send a v3
with this small correction.
>
> > +structure as shown below:
> > +.PP
> > +.in +4n
> > +.EX
> > +struct uffdio_poison {
> > + struct uffdio_range range;
> > + /* Range to install poison PTE markers in */
> > + __u64 mode; /* Flags controlling the behavior of poison */
> > + __s64 updated; /* Number of bytes poisoned, or negated error */
> > +};
> > +.EE
> > +.in
> > +.PP
> > +The following value may be bitwise ORed in
> > +.I mode
> > +to change the behavior of the
> > +.B UFFDIO_POISON
> > +operation:
> > +.TP
> > +.B UFFDIO_POISON_MODE_DONTWAKE
> > +Do not wake up the thread that waits for page-fault resolution.
> > +.PP
> > +The
> > +.I updated
> > +field is used by the kernel
> > +to return the number of bytes that were actually poisoned,
> > +or an error in the same manner as
> > +.BR UFFDIO_COPY .
> > +If the value returned in the
> > +.I updated
> > +field doesn't match the value that was specified in
> > +.IR range.len ,
> > +the operation fails with the error
> > +.BR EAGAIN .
> > +The
> > +.I updated
> > +field is output-only;
> > +it is not read by the
> > +.B UFFDIO_POISON
> > +operation.
> > +.PP
> > +This
> > +.BR ioctl (2)
> > +operation returns 0 on success.
> > +In this case,
> > +the entire area was poisoned.
> > +On error, \-1 is returned and
> > +.I errno
> > +is set to indicate the error.
> > +Possible errors include:
> > +.TP
> > +.B EAGAIN
> > +The number of bytes mapped
> > +(i.e., the value returned in the
> > +.I updated
> > +field)
> > +does not equal the value that was specified in the
> > +.I range.len
> > +field.
> > +.TP
> > +.B EINVAL
> > +Either
> > +.I range.start
> > +or
> > +.I range.len
> > +was not a multiple of the system page size; or
> > +.I range.len
> > +was zero; or the range specified was invalid.
> > +.TP
> > +.B EINVAL
> > +An invalid bit was specified in the
> > +.I mode
> > +field.
> > +.TP
> > +.B EEXIST
> > +One or more pages were already mapped in the given range.
> > +.TP
> > +.B ENOENT
> > +The faulting process has changed its virtual memory layout simultaneously with
> > +an outstanding
> > +.B UFFDIO_POISON
> > +operation.
> > +.TP
> > +.B ENOMEM
> > +Allocating memory for page table entries failed.
> > +.TP
> > +.B ESRCH
> > +The faulting process has exited at the time of a
> > +.B UFFDIO_POISON
> > +operation.
> > +.\"
> > .SH RETURN VALUE
> > See descriptions of the individual operations, above.
> > .SH ERRORS
> > --
> > 2.42.0.459.ge4e396fd5e-goog
> >
> >
>
> --
> Sincerely yours,
> Mike.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-10 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20230919190206.388896-1-axelrasmussen@google.com>
2023-09-19 19:01 ` [PATCH 01/10] userfaultfd.2: briefly mention two-step feature handshake process Axel Rasmussen
2023-09-25 23:26 ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-10-09 8:38 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-09-19 19:01 ` [PATCH 02/10] userfaultfd.2: reword to account for new fault resolution ioctls Axel Rasmussen
2023-09-25 23:29 ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-10-09 8:39 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-09-19 19:01 ` [PATCH 03/10] userfaultfd.2: comment on feature detection in the example program Axel Rasmussen
2023-09-25 23:32 ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-10-09 8:40 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-09-19 19:02 ` [PATCH 05/10] ioctl_userfaultfd.2: describe two-step feature handshake Axel Rasmussen
2023-09-25 23:44 ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-10-09 8:42 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-10-09 10:58 ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-09-19 19:02 ` [PATCH 06/10] ioctl_userfaultfd.2: describe missing UFFDIO_API feature flags Axel Rasmussen
2023-09-25 23:50 ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-10-09 8:45 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-10-09 10:49 ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-09-19 19:02 ` [PATCH 07/10] ioctl_userfaultfd.2: correct and update UFFDIO_API ioctl error codes Axel Rasmussen
2023-09-25 23:52 ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-10-09 8:49 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-10-09 11:01 ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-09-19 19:02 ` [PATCH 08/10] ioctl_userfaultfd.2: clarify the state of the uffdio_api structure on error Axel Rasmussen
2023-09-25 23:56 ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-09-26 17:58 ` Axel Rasmussen
2023-10-09 9:03 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-09-19 19:02 ` [PATCH 09/10] ioctl_userfaultfd.2: fix / update UFFDIO_REGISTER error code list Axel Rasmussen
2023-09-19 19:02 ` [PATCH 10/10] ioctl_userfaultfd.2: document new UFFDIO_POISON ioctl Axel Rasmussen
2023-10-09 9:09 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-10-10 17:13 ` Axel Rasmussen [this message]
[not found] ` <20230919190206.388896-5-axelrasmussen@google.com>
2023-09-25 23:37 ` [PATCH 04/10] ioctl_userfaultfd.2: fix a few trivial mistakes Alejandro Colomar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJHvVcg8CDoXTjuWiABy8Mu-fwFmb6fVgHNXWwS=GVFNPx8j+g@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=alx@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox