From: Juan Yescas <jyescas@google.com>
To: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
tjmercier@google.com, isaacmanjarres@google.com,
surenb@google.com, kaleshsingh@google.com,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Add ARCH_FORCE_PAGE_BLOCK_ORDER to select page block order
Date: Thu, 1 May 2025 14:17:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJDx_riTDWUkFSUr9GenJMQ1Oi1=Q4wU5iNE1JfX5wWnCSesVg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15428BF6-A7DD-44ED-B225-AECD7866394C@nvidia.com>
On Thu, May 1, 2025 at 11:49 AM Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> wrote:
>
> On 1 May 2025, at 1:25, Juan Yescas wrote:
>
> > Problem: On large page size configurations (16KiB, 64KiB), the CMA
> > alignment requirement (CMA_MIN_ALIGNMENT_BYTES) increases considerably,
> > and this causes the CMA reservations to be larger than necessary.
> > This means that system will have less available MIGRATE_UNMOVABLE and
> > MIGRATE_RECLAIMABLE page blocks since MIGRATE_CMA can't fallback to them.
> >
> > The CMA_MIN_ALIGNMENT_BYTES increases because it depends on
> > MAX_PAGE_ORDER which depends on ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER. The value of
> > ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER increases on 16k and 64k kernels.
> >
> > For example, the CMA alignment requirement when:
> >
> > - CONFIG_ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER default value is used
> > - CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE is set:
> >
> > PAGE_SIZE | MAX_PAGE_ORDER | pageblock_order | CMA_MIN_ALIGNMENT_BYTES
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 4KiB | 10 | 10 | 4KiB * (2 ^ 10) = 4MiB
> > 16Kib | 11 | 11 | 16KiB * (2 ^ 11) = 32MiB
> > 64KiB | 13 | 13 | 64KiB * (2 ^ 13) = 512MiB
> >
> > There are some extreme cases for the CMA alignment requirement when:
> >
> > - CONFIG_ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER maximum value is set
> > - CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE is NOT set:
> > - CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE is NOT set
> >
> > PAGE_SIZE | MAX_PAGE_ORDER | pageblock_order | CMA_MIN_ALIGNMENT_BYTES
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 4KiB | 15 | 15 | 4KiB * (2 ^ 15) = 128MiB
> > 16Kib | 13 | 13 | 16KiB * (2 ^ 13) = 128MiB
> > 64KiB | 13 | 13 | 64KiB * (2 ^ 13) = 512MiB
> >
> > This affects the CMA reservations for the drivers. If a driver in a
> > 4KiB kernel needs 4MiB of CMA memory, in a 16KiB kernel, the minimal
> > reservation has to be 32MiB due to the alignment requirements:
> >
> > reserved-memory {
> > ...
> > cma_test_reserve: cma_test_reserve {
> > compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
> > size = <0x0 0x400000>; /* 4 MiB */
> > ...
> > };
> > };
> >
> > reserved-memory {
> > ...
> > cma_test_reserve: cma_test_reserve {
> > compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
> > size = <0x0 0x2000000>; /* 32 MiB */
> > ...
> > };
> > };
> >
> > Solution: Add a new config ARCH_FORCE_PAGE_BLOCK_ORDER that
> > allows to set the page block order. The maximum page block
> > order will be given by ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER.
> >
> > By default, ARCH_FORCE_PAGE_BLOCK_ORDER will have the same
> > value that ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER. This will make sure that
> > current kernel configurations won't be affected by this
> > change. It is a opt-in change.
> >
> > This patch will allow to have the same CMA alignment
> > requirements for large page sizes (16KiB, 64KiB) as that
> > in 4kb kernels by setting a lower pageblock_order.
> >
> > Tests:
> >
> > - Verified that HugeTLB pages work when pageblock_order is 1, 7, 10
> > on 4k and 16k kernels.
> >
> > - Verified that Transparent Huge Pages work when pageblock_order
> > is 1, 7, 10 on 4k and 16k kernels.
> >
> > - Verified that dma-buf heaps allocations work when pageblock_order
> > is 1, 7, 10 on 4k and 16k kernels.
> >
> > Benchmarks:
> >
> > The benchmarks compare 16kb kernels with pageblock_order 10 and 7. The
> > reason for the pageblock_order 7 is because this value makes the min
> > CMA alignment requirement the same as that in 4kb kernels (2MB).
> >
> > - Perform 100K dma-buf heaps (/dev/dma_heap/system) allocations of
> > SZ_8M, SZ_4M, SZ_2M, SZ_1M, SZ_64, SZ_8, SZ_4. Use simpleperf
> > (https://developer.android.com/ndk/guides/simpleperf) to measure
> > the # of instructions and page-faults on 16k kernels.
> > The benchmark was executed 10 times. The averages are below:
> >
> > # instructions | #page-faults
> > order 10 | order 7 | order 10 | order 7
> > --------------------------------------------------------
> > 13,891,765,770 | 11,425,777,314 | 220 | 217
> > 14,456,293,487 | 12,660,819,302 | 224 | 219
> > 13,924,261,018 | 13,243,970,736 | 217 | 221
> > 13,910,886,504 | 13,845,519,630 | 217 | 221
> > 14,388,071,190 | 13,498,583,098 | 223 | 224
> > 13,656,442,167 | 12,915,831,681 | 216 | 218
> > 13,300,268,343 | 12,930,484,776 | 222 | 218
> > 13,625,470,223 | 14,234,092,777 | 219 | 218
> > 13,508,964,965 | 13,432,689,094 | 225 | 219
> > 13,368,950,667 | 13,683,587,37 | 219 | 225
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 13,803,137,433 | 13,131,974,268 | 220 | 220 Averages
> >
> > There were 4.85% #instructions when order was 7, in comparison
> > with order 10.
> >
> > 13,803,137,433 - 13,131,974,268 = -671,163,166 (-4.86%)
> >
> > The number of page faults in order 7 and 10 were the same.
> >
> > These results didn't show any significant regression when the
> > pageblock_order is set to 7 on 16kb kernels.
> >
> > - Run speedometer 3.1 (https://browserbench.org/Speedometer3.1/) 5 times
> > on the 16k kernels with pageblock_order 7 and 10.
> >
> > order 10 | order 7 | order 7 - order 10 | (order 7 - order 10) %
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 15.8 | 16.4 | 0.6 | 3.80%
> > 16.4 | 16.2 | -0.2 | -1.22%
> > 16.6 | 16.3 | -0.3 | -1.81%
> > 16.8 | 16.3 | -0.5 | -2.98%
> > 16.6 | 16.8 | 0.2 | 1.20%
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 16.44 16.4 -0.04 -0.24% Averages
> >
> > The results didn't show any significant regression when the
> > pageblock_order is set to 7 on 16kb kernels.
> >
> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> > Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> > Cc: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
> > Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
> > Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> > CC: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
> > Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
> > Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Juan Yescas <jyescas@google.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/Kconfig | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > include/linux/pageblock-flags.h | 12 +++++++++---
> > 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> > index a182295e6f08..d784049e1e01 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> > @@ -1658,6 +1658,20 @@ config ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER
> >
> > Don't change if unsure.
> >
> > +config ARCH_FORCE_PAGE_BLOCK_ORDER
> > + int "Page Block Order"
> > + range 1 ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER
> > + default ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER
> > + help
> > + The page block order refers to the power of two number of pages that
> > + are physically contiguous and can have a migrate type associated to them.
> > + The maximum size of the page block order is limited by ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER.
>
> Since memory compaction operates at pageblock granularity and pageblock size
> usually matches THP size, a smaller pageblock size degrades kernel
> anti-fragmentation mechanism for THP significantly. Can you add something like
> the text below to the help section?
>
> "Reducing pageblock order can negatively impact THP generation successful rate.
> If your workloads uses THP heavily, please use this option with caution."
>
Thanks Zi for Pointing this out. I will add the comment in the help section.
> Otherwise, Acked-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
>
> I am also OK if you move this to mm/Kconfig.
>
This seems reasonable to me.
> > +
> > + This option allows overriding the default setting when the page
> > + block order requires to be smaller than ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER.
> > +
> > + Don't change if unsure.
> > +
> > config UNMAP_KERNEL_AT_EL0
> > bool "Unmap kernel when running in userspace (KPTI)" if EXPERT
> > default y
> > diff --git a/include/linux/pageblock-flags.h b/include/linux/pageblock-flags.h
> > index fc6b9c87cb0a..ab3de96bb50c 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/pageblock-flags.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/pageblock-flags.h
> > @@ -28,6 +28,12 @@ enum pageblock_bits {
> > NR_PAGEBLOCK_BITS
> > };
> >
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_FORCE_PAGE_BLOCK_ORDER)
> > +#define PAGE_BLOCK_ORDER CONFIG_ARCH_FORCE_PAGE_BLOCK_ORDER
> > +#else
> > +#define PAGE_BLOCK_ORDER MAX_PAGE_ORDER
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_FORCE_PAGE_BLOCK_ORDER */
> > +
> > #if defined(CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE)
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE_SIZE_VARIABLE
> > @@ -41,18 +47,18 @@ extern unsigned int pageblock_order;
> > * Huge pages are a constant size, but don't exceed the maximum allocation
> > * granularity.
> > */
> > -#define pageblock_order MIN_T(unsigned int, HUGETLB_PAGE_ORDER, MAX_PAGE_ORDER)
> > +#define pageblock_order MIN_T(unsigned int, HUGETLB_PAGE_ORDER, PAGE_BLOCK_ORDER)
> >
> > #endif /* CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE_SIZE_VARIABLE */
> >
> > #elif defined(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE)
> >
> > -#define pageblock_order MIN_T(unsigned int, HPAGE_PMD_ORDER, MAX_PAGE_ORDER)
> > +#define pageblock_order MIN_T(unsigned int, HPAGE_PMD_ORDER, PAGE_BLOCK_ORDER)
> >
> > #else /* CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE */
> >
> > /* If huge pages are not used, group by MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES */
> > -#define pageblock_order MAX_PAGE_ORDER
> > +#define pageblock_order PAGE_BLOCK_ORDER
> >
> > #endif /* CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE */
> >
> > --
> > 2.49.0.906.g1f30a19c02-goog
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Yan, Zi
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-01 21:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-01 5:25 Juan Yescas
2025-05-01 14:24 ` Zi Yan
2025-05-01 17:11 ` Juan Yescas
2025-05-01 18:21 ` Kalesh Singh
2025-05-01 18:40 ` Zi Yan
2025-05-01 18:38 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-05-01 19:27 ` Juan Yescas
2025-05-01 21:07 ` Juan Yescas
2025-05-02 11:37 ` Will Deacon
2025-05-05 18:58 ` Juan Yescas
2025-05-01 18:49 ` Zi Yan
2025-05-01 21:17 ` Juan Yescas [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJDx_riTDWUkFSUr9GenJMQ1Oi1=Q4wU5iNE1JfX5wWnCSesVg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=jyescas@google.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=isaacmanjarres@google.com \
--cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tjmercier@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox