From: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@huawei.com>,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, roman.gushchin@linux.dev,
shakeel.butt@linux.dev, muchun.song@linux.dev,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] mm: memcg: remove redundant seq_buf_has_overflowed()
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 05:00:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJD7tkb9-qzYGOMHu1DfCSsWmRfCuK5Vi3NBmTz6d-dvaeAAtw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zn1Tg6_9NyxJE7Tk@tiehlicka>
On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 4:56 AM Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu 27-06-24 04:33:50, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 12:13 AM Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed 26-06-24 09:42:32, Xiu Jianfeng wrote:
> > > > Both the end of memory_stat_format() and memcg_stat_format() will call
> > > > WARN_ON_ONCE(seq_buf_has_overflowed()). However, memory_stat_format()
> > > > is the only caller of memcg_stat_format(), when memcg is on the default
> > > > hierarchy, seq_buf_has_overflowed() will be executed twice, so remove
> > > > the reduntant one.
> > >
> > > Shouldn't we rather remove both? Are they giving us anything useful
> > > actually? Would a simpl pr_warn be sufficient? Afterall all we care
> > > about is to learn that we need to grow the buffer size because our stats
> > > do not fit anymore. It is not really important whether that is an OOM or
> > > cgroupfs interface path.
> >
> > Is it possible for userspace readers to break if the stats are
> > incomplete?
>
> They will certainly get an imprecise picture. Sufficient to break I
> dunno.
If some stats go completely missing and a parser expects them to
always be there, I think they may break.
>
> > If yes, I think WARN_ON_ONCE() may be prompted to make it
> > easier to catch and fix before deployment.
>
> The only advantage of WARN_ON_ONCE is that the splat is so verbose that
> it gets noticed.
Right, that's exactly what I meant.
> And also it panics the system if panic_on_warn is
> enabled. I do not particularly care about the latter but to me it seems
> like the warning is just an over reaction and a simple pr_warn should
> just achieve the similar effect - see my other reply
If pr_warn()'s usually get noticed in a timely manner (by testers or
bots), then I think pr_warn() would be sufficient. If they can go
unnoticed for a while, I think WARN_ON_ONCE() may be warranted to
avoid the possibility of breaking a userspace parser.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-27 12:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-26 9:42 Xiu Jianfeng
2024-06-27 7:13 ` Michal Hocko
2024-06-27 8:33 ` xiujianfeng
2024-06-27 11:20 ` Michal Hocko
2024-06-27 11:43 ` xiujianfeng
2024-06-27 11:54 ` Michal Hocko
2024-06-28 2:20 ` xiujianfeng
2024-06-28 7:09 ` Michal Hocko
2024-06-27 11:33 ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-06-27 11:56 ` Michal Hocko
2024-06-27 12:00 ` Yosry Ahmed [this message]
2024-06-27 12:28 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJD7tkb9-qzYGOMHu1DfCSsWmRfCuK5Vi3NBmTz6d-dvaeAAtw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=yosryahmed@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=xiujianfeng@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox