From: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
To: guro@fb.com, vvs@virtuozzo.com
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
cl@linux.com, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Questions about memcg_slabinfo.py drgn script
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 12:21:44 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJD7tkb2N0twLTCZRxj78wquF47mdVqTKqvy=PtmZrAn7jndDg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Hi everyone,
I was looking at the memcg_slabinfo.py drgn script that offers a
replacement to the deprecated memory.kmem.slabinfo. I had some
questions about how it collects the memcg slab stats:
1. Why does the script loop through all struct pages on the system?
Wouldn't it be more efficient to loop for every kmem_cache, for every
online kmem_cache_node, then loop through slabs_free, slabs_full, and
slabs_partial lists?
This seems more consistent with how /proc/slabinfo works, and more
efficient. I tested this on SLAB using a crash script as I am unable
to run drgn on my current setup. I am not sure how correct this would
be for SLUB though.
2. Before looping through pages, why does the script collect all
objcgs belonging to the desired memcg in a set, and then test every
objcg in a slab page to see whether it belongs to that memcg. Wouldn't
it be easier to just check objcg->memcg? AFAICT this gets updated as
well when the objcg is reparented.
Sorry for my ignorance if any of the assumptions I made are incorrect.
I just wanted to get more understanding of the implementation
decisions taken while writing the script.
Thanks.
next reply other threads:[~2022-03-10 20:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-10 20:21 Yosry Ahmed [this message]
2022-03-10 23:40 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-03-16 21:16 ` Yosry Ahmed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJD7tkb2N0twLTCZRxj78wquF47mdVqTKqvy=PtmZrAn7jndDg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=yosryahmed@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=vvs@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox