linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
To: guro@fb.com, vvs@virtuozzo.com
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	 Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	cl@linux.com,  linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Questions about memcg_slabinfo.py drgn script
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 12:21:44 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJD7tkb2N0twLTCZRxj78wquF47mdVqTKqvy=PtmZrAn7jndDg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

Hi everyone,

I was looking at the memcg_slabinfo.py drgn script that offers a
replacement to the deprecated memory.kmem.slabinfo. I had some
questions about how it collects the memcg slab stats:

1. Why does the script loop through all struct pages on the system?
Wouldn't it be more efficient to loop for every kmem_cache, for every
online kmem_cache_node, then loop through slabs_free, slabs_full, and
slabs_partial lists?

This seems more consistent with how /proc/slabinfo works, and more
efficient. I tested this on SLAB using a crash script as I am unable
to run drgn on my current setup. I am not sure how correct this would
be for SLUB though.

2. Before looping through pages, why does the script collect all
objcgs belonging to the desired memcg in a set, and then test every
objcg in a slab page to see whether it belongs to that memcg. Wouldn't
it be easier to just check objcg->memcg? AFAICT this gets updated as
well when the objcg is reparented.

Sorry for my ignorance if any of the assumptions I made are incorrect.
I just wanted to get more understanding of the implementation
decisions taken while writing the script.

Thanks.


             reply	other threads:[~2022-03-10 20:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-10 20:21 Yosry Ahmed [this message]
2022-03-10 23:40 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-03-16 21:16   ` Yosry Ahmed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJD7tkb2N0twLTCZRxj78wquF47mdVqTKqvy=PtmZrAn7jndDg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=yosryahmed@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=vvs@virtuozzo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox