From: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
To: Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>
Cc: hannes@cmpxchg.org, nphamcs@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
chrisl@kernel.org, v-songbaohua@oppo.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ira.weiny@intel.com,
syzbot+adbc983a1588b7805de3@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: zswap: fix kernel BUG in sg_init_one
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 16:16:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJD7tkaZNNn2p-WXx9EGTS+kR3yzYYC4JZwq=5g0D1VsHP=kdQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGsJ_4wqPuZc47h=QRPForrxinhG3cvoh4VupLyDRo_uhneC-g@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 4:12 PM Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 12:06 PM Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 4:00 PM Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>
> > >
> > > sg_init_one() relies on linearly mapped low memory for the safe
> > > utilization of virt_to_page(). Consequently, we have two choices:
> > > either employ kmap_to_page() alongside sg_set_page(), or resort to
> > > copying high memory contents to a temporary buffer residing in low
> > > memory. However, considering the introduction of the WARN_ON_ONCE
> > > in commit ef6e06b2ef870 ("highmem: fix kmap_to_page() for
> > > kmap_local_page() addresses"), which specifically addresses high
> > > memory concerns, it appears that memcpy remains the sole viable
> > > option.
> > >
> > > Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+adbc983a1588b7805de3@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> > > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/000000000000bbb3d80613f243a6@google.com/
> > > Fixes: 270700dd06ca ("mm/zswap: remove the memcpy if acomp is not sleepable")
> > > Signed-off-by: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>
> > > ---
> > > mm/zswap.c | 5 +++--
> > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/mm/zswap.c b/mm/zswap.c
> > > index 9dec853647c8..17bf6d87b274 100644
> > > --- a/mm/zswap.c
> > > +++ b/mm/zswap.c
> > > @@ -1080,7 +1080,8 @@ static void zswap_decompress(struct zswap_entry *entry, struct page *page)
> > > mutex_lock(&acomp_ctx->mutex);
> > >
> > > src = zpool_map_handle(zpool, entry->handle, ZPOOL_MM_RO);
> > > - if (acomp_ctx->is_sleepable && !zpool_can_sleep_mapped(zpool)) {
> > > + if ((acomp_ctx->is_sleepable && !zpool_can_sleep_mapped(zpool)) ||
> > > + !virt_addr_valid(src)) {
> >
> >
> > Would it be better to explicitly check is_kmap_addr() here? I am
> > particularly worried about hiding a bug where the returned address
> > from zpool_map_handle() is not a kmap address, but also not a valid
> > linear mapping address.
> >
> > If we use is_kmap_addr() here, then the virt_addr_valid() check in
> > sg_init_one() will catch any non-kmap non-linear mapping addresses.
> > WDYT? Am I being paranoid? :)
>
> we have a possibility that a userspace buffer or vmalloc address is given to
> sg_init_one, then it is non-kmap non-linear. but is it possible someday some
> people return a vmalloc/vmap address from zpool_map_handle() in the future?
> then we still need !virt_addr_valid().
Hmm I guess if zpool_map_handle() ever returns a vmalloc/vmap address
we would need to copy the data to the buffer in zswap code, at least
until we enlighten the code to deal with them directly. So I guess we
can keep virt_addr_valid(). Ideally the comment will clarify this.
Thanks!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-18 23:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-18 23:00 Barry Song
[not found] ` <CAJD7tkYVJHsWoaEkTiTigJRzSNBrRSg3YVAL3Q5Q96cLSNJZrQ@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAGsJ_4wqPuZc47h=QRPForrxinhG3cvoh4VupLyDRo_uhneC-g@mail.gmail.com>
2024-03-18 23:16 ` Yosry Ahmed [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJD7tkaZNNn2p-WXx9EGTS+kR3yzYYC4JZwq=5g0D1VsHP=kdQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=yosryahmed@google.com \
--cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
--cc=syzbot+adbc983a1588b7805de3@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=v-songbaohua@oppo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox