From: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
To: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] mm, swap_cgroup: remove global swap cgroup lock
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2024 11:37:32 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJD7tka9L-4VZVi1QkC_DuKCLyA71LbLd2chSPNK66yQRS2K+w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241202184154.19321-5-ryncsn@gmail.com>
On Mon, Dec 2, 2024 at 10:42 AM Kairui Song <ryncsn@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
>
> commit e9e58a4ec3b1 ("memcg: avoid use cmpxchg in swap cgroup maintainance")
> replaced the cmpxchg/xchg with a global irq spinlock because some archs
> doesn't support 2 bytes cmpxchg/xchg. Clearly this won't scale well.
>
> And as commented in swap_cgroup.c, this lock is not needed for map
> synchronization.
>
> Emulation of 2 bytes cmpxchg/xchg with atomic isn't hard, so implement
> it to get rid of this lock.
>
> Testing using 64G brd and build with build kernel with make -j96 in 1.5G
> memory cgroup using 4k folios showed below improvement (10 test run):
>
> Before this series:
> Sys time: 10730.08 (stdev 49.030728)
> Real time: 171.03 (stdev 0.850355)
>
> After this commit:
> Sys time: 9612.24 (stdev 66.310789), -10.42%
> Real time: 159.78 (stdev 0.577193), -6.57%
>
> With 64k folios and 2G memcg:
> Before this series:
> Sys time: 7626.77 (stdev 43.545517)
> Real time: 136.22 (stdev 1.265544)
>
> After this commit:
> Sys time: 6936.03 (stdev 39.996280), -9.06%
> Real time: 129.65 (stdev 0.880039), -4.82%
>
> Sequential swapout of 8G 4k zero folios (24 test run):
> Before this series:
> 5461409.12 us (stdev 183957.827084)
>
> After this commit:
> 5420447.26 us (stdev 196419.240317)
>
> Sequential swapin of 8G 4k zero folios (24 test run):
> Before this series:
> 19736958.916667 us (stdev 189027.246676)
>
> After this commit:
> 19662182.629630 us (stdev 172717.640614)
>
> Performance is better or at least not worse for all tests above.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
> ---
> mm/swap_cgroup.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/swap_cgroup.c b/mm/swap_cgroup.c
> index a76afdc3666a..028f5e6be3f0 100644
> --- a/mm/swap_cgroup.c
> +++ b/mm/swap_cgroup.c
> @@ -5,6 +5,15 @@
>
> #include <linux/swapops.h> /* depends on mm.h include */
>
> +#define ID_PER_UNIT (sizeof(atomic_t) / sizeof(unsigned short))
> +struct swap_cgroup_unit {
> + union {
> + int raw;
> + atomic_t val;
> + unsigned short __id[ID_PER_UNIT];
> + };
> +};
> +
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(swap_cgroup_mutex);
>
> struct swap_cgroup {
> @@ -12,8 +21,10 @@ struct swap_cgroup {
> };
>
> struct swap_cgroup_ctrl {
> - unsigned short *map;
> - spinlock_t lock;
> + union {
> + struct swap_cgroup_unit *units;
> + unsigned short *map;
> + };
> };
>
> static struct swap_cgroup_ctrl swap_cgroup_ctrl[MAX_SWAPFILES];
> @@ -31,6 +42,24 @@ static struct swap_cgroup_ctrl swap_cgroup_ctrl[MAX_SWAPFILES];
> *
> * TODO: we can push these buffers out to HIGHMEM.
> */
While you're at it, I think the comment above is quite outdated :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-02 19:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-02 18:41 [PATCH 0/4] mm/swap_cgroup: " Kairui Song
2024-12-02 18:41 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm, memcontrol: avoid duplicated memcg enable check Kairui Song
2024-12-02 19:10 ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-12-03 8:25 ` Kairui Song
2024-12-03 18:28 ` Chris Li
2024-12-04 17:05 ` Shakeel Butt
2024-12-02 21:37 ` Shakeel Butt
2024-12-02 22:27 ` Roman Gushchin
2024-12-03 0:24 ` Barry Song
2024-12-03 2:03 ` kernel test robot
2024-12-03 5:42 ` kernel test robot
2024-12-02 18:41 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm/swap_cgroup: remove swap_cgroup_cmpxchg Kairui Song
2024-12-02 19:11 ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-12-02 21:38 ` Shakeel Butt
2024-12-02 22:28 ` Roman Gushchin
2024-12-03 18:29 ` Chris Li
2024-12-02 18:41 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm/swap_cgroup: simplify swap cgroup definitions Kairui Song
2024-12-02 19:25 ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-12-04 21:14 ` Chris Li
2024-12-10 8:15 ` Kairui Song
2024-12-02 22:34 ` Roman Gushchin
2024-12-02 18:41 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm, swap_cgroup: remove global swap cgroup lock Kairui Song
2024-12-02 19:28 ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-12-02 20:35 ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-12-03 18:20 ` Kairui Song
2024-12-03 19:17 ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-12-04 17:58 ` Kairui Song
2024-12-04 18:57 ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-12-02 19:37 ` Yosry Ahmed [this message]
2024-12-04 19:34 ` Chris Li
2024-12-10 7:05 ` Kairui Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJD7tka9L-4VZVi1QkC_DuKCLyA71LbLd2chSPNK66yQRS2K+w@mail.gmail.com \
--to=yosryahmed@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox