From: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
mkoutny@suse.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-cgroup: Flush stats before releasing blkcg_gq
Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 19:06:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJD7tkZkbro4H-QC=RJx_dfCdGQ5c=4NJhbFrcEmQSidaaMOmg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230524011935.719659-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
Hi Ming,
On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 6:21 PM Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> As noted by Michal, the blkg_iostat_set's in the lockless list
> hold reference to blkg's to protect against their removal. Those
> blkg's hold reference to blkcg. When a cgroup is being destroyed,
> cgroup_rstat_flush() is only called at css_release_work_fn() which
> is called when the blkcg reference count reaches 0. This circular
> dependency will prevent blkcg and some blkgs from being freed after
> they are made offline.
I am not at all familiar with blkcg, but does calling
cgroup_rstat_flush() in offline_css() fix the problem? or can items be
added to the lockless list(s) after the blkcg is offlined?
>
> It is less a problem if the cgroup to be destroyed also has other
> controllers like memory that will call cgroup_rstat_flush() which will
> clean up the reference count. If block is the only controller that uses
> rstat, these offline blkcg and blkgs may never be freed leaking more
> and more memory over time.
>
> To prevent this potential memory leak:
>
> - a new cgroup_rstat_css_cpu_flush() function is added to flush stats for
> a given css and cpu. This new function will be called in __blkg_release().
>
> - don't grab bio->bi_blkg when adding the stats into blkcg's per-cpu
> stat list, and this kind of handling is the most fragile part of
> original patch
>
> Based on Waiman's patch:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20221215033132.230023-3-longman@redhat.com/
>
> Fixes: 3b8cc6298724 ("blk-cgroup: Optimize blkcg_rstat_flush()")
> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
> Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Cc: mkoutny@suse.com
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> ---
> block/blk-cgroup.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> include/linux/cgroup.h | 1 +
> kernel/cgroup/rstat.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-cgroup.c b/block/blk-cgroup.c
> index 0ce64dd73cfe..5437b6af3955 100644
> --- a/block/blk-cgroup.c
> +++ b/block/blk-cgroup.c
> @@ -163,10 +163,23 @@ static void blkg_free(struct blkcg_gq *blkg)
> static void __blkg_release(struct rcu_head *rcu)
> {
> struct blkcg_gq *blkg = container_of(rcu, struct blkcg_gq, rcu_head);
> + struct blkcg *blkcg = blkg->blkcg;
> + int cpu;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_CGROUP_PUNT_BIO
> WARN_ON(!bio_list_empty(&blkg->async_bios));
> #endif
> + /*
> + * Flush all the non-empty percpu lockless lists before releasing
> + * us. Meantime no new bio can refer to this blkg any more given
> + * the refcnt is killed.
> + */
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> + struct llist_head *lhead = per_cpu_ptr(blkcg->lhead, cpu);
> +
> + if (!llist_empty(lhead))
> + cgroup_rstat_css_cpu_flush(&blkcg->css, cpu);
> + }
>
> /* release the blkcg and parent blkg refs this blkg has been holding */
> css_put(&blkg->blkcg->css);
> @@ -991,7 +1004,6 @@ static void blkcg_rstat_flush(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css, int cpu)
> if (parent && parent->parent)
> blkcg_iostat_update(parent, &blkg->iostat.cur,
> &blkg->iostat.last);
> - percpu_ref_put(&blkg->refcnt);
> }
>
> out:
> @@ -2075,7 +2087,6 @@ void blk_cgroup_bio_start(struct bio *bio)
>
> llist_add(&bis->lnode, lhead);
> WRITE_ONCE(bis->lqueued, true);
> - percpu_ref_get(&bis->blkg->refcnt);
> }
>
> u64_stats_update_end_irqrestore(&bis->sync, flags);
> diff --git a/include/linux/cgroup.h b/include/linux/cgroup.h
> index 885f5395fcd0..97d4764d8e6a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cgroup.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cgroup.h
> @@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ void cgroup_rstat_flush(struct cgroup *cgrp);
> void cgroup_rstat_flush_atomic(struct cgroup *cgrp);
> void cgroup_rstat_flush_hold(struct cgroup *cgrp);
> void cgroup_rstat_flush_release(void);
> +void cgroup_rstat_css_cpu_flush(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css, int cpu);
>
> /*
> * Basic resource stats.
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/rstat.c b/kernel/cgroup/rstat.c
> index 9c4c55228567..96e7a4e6da72 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/rstat.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/rstat.c
> @@ -281,6 +281,24 @@ void cgroup_rstat_flush_release(void)
> spin_unlock_irq(&cgroup_rstat_lock);
> }
>
> +/**
> + * cgroup_rstat_css_cpu_flush - flush stats for the given css and cpu
> + * @css: target css to be flush
> + * @cpu: the cpu that holds the stats to be flush
> + *
> + * A lightweight rstat flush operation for a given css and cpu.
> + * Only the cpu_lock is being held for mutual exclusion, the cgroup_rstat_lock
> + * isn't used.
(Adding linux-mm and memcg maintainers)
+Linux-MM +Michal Hocko +Shakeel Butt +Johannes Weiner +Roman Gushchin
+Muchun Song
I don't think flushing the stats without holding cgroup_rstat_lock is
safe for memcg stats flushing. mem_cgroup_css_rstat_flush() modifies
some non-percpu data (e.g. memcg->vmstats->state,
memcg->vmstats->state_pending).
Perhaps have this be a separate callback than css_rstat_flush() (e.g.
css_rstat_flush_cpu() or something), so that it's clear what
subsystems support this? In this case, only blkcg would implement this
callback.
> + */
> +void cgroup_rstat_css_cpu_flush(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css, int cpu)
> +{
> + raw_spinlock_t *cpu_lock = per_cpu_ptr(&cgroup_rstat_cpu_lock, cpu);
> +
> + raw_spin_lock_irq(cpu_lock);
> + css->ss->css_rstat_flush(css, cpu);
I think we need to check that css_rstat_flush() (or a new callback) is
implemented before calling it here.
> + raw_spin_unlock_irq(cpu_lock);
> +}
> +
> int cgroup_rstat_init(struct cgroup *cgrp)
> {
> int cpu;
> --
> 2.40.1
>
next parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-24 2:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20230524011935.719659-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
2023-05-24 2:06 ` Yosry Ahmed [this message]
2023-05-24 2:37 ` Ming Lei
2023-05-24 2:43 ` Yosry Ahmed
2023-05-24 4:10 ` Waiman Long
2023-05-24 4:21 ` Ming Lei
2023-05-25 14:11 ` Michal Koutný
2023-05-25 15:25 ` Waiman Long
2023-05-26 21:11 ` Michal Koutný
2023-05-24 4:04 ` Waiman Long
2023-05-24 4:13 ` Yosry Ahmed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJD7tkZkbro4H-QC=RJx_dfCdGQ5c=4NJhbFrcEmQSidaaMOmg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=yosryahmed@google.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox