From: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] mm: vmscan: ignore non-LRU-based reclaim in memcg reclaim
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 09:24:48 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJD7tkZH-rJFQhfWNLbSoKhHzTQmLf0TaAJbL-XtvatbMeuVKQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJD7tkZxwuR6JoVo9RnepXA3Kg7HVMLyzTfTdRvLg27OihECiw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 9:18 AM Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 3:56 AM kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Yosry,
> >
> > Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
> >
> > [auto build test ERROR on akpm-mm/mm-everything]
> > [also build test ERROR on linus/master next-20230228]
> > [cannot apply to vbabka-slab/for-next xfs-linux/for-next v6.2]
> > [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> > And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> > https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
> >
> > url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Yosry-Ahmed/mm-vmscan-refactor-updating-reclaimed-pages-in-reclaim_state/20230228-165214
> > base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything
> > patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230228085002.2592473-3-yosryahmed%40google.com
> > patch subject: [PATCH v1 2/2] mm: vmscan: ignore non-LRU-based reclaim in memcg reclaim
> > config: i386-randconfig-a002-20230227 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230228/202302281933.vU1PHuZr-lkp@intel.com/config)
> > compiler: clang version 14.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project f28c006a5895fc0e329fe15fead81e37457cb1d1)
> > reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
> > wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> > # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/f6d2b849f186a927925a29e289d60895048550f5
> > git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
> > git fetch --no-tags linux-review Yosry-Ahmed/mm-vmscan-refactor-updating-reclaimed-pages-in-reclaim_state/20230228-165214
> > git checkout f6d2b849f186a927925a29e289d60895048550f5
> > # save the config file
> > mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
> > COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=i386 olddefconfig
> > COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=i386 SHELL=/bin/bash
> >
> > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
> > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > | Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202302281933.vU1PHuZr-lkp@intel.com/
> >
> > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> >
> > >> mm/vmscan.c:549:13: error: redefinition of 'cgroup_reclaim'
> > static bool cgroup_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
> > ^
> > mm/vmscan.c:191:13: note: previous definition is here
> > static bool cgroup_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
> > ^
> > >> mm/vmscan.c:554:13: error: redefinition of 'global_reclaim'
> > static bool global_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
> > ^
> > mm/vmscan.c:196:13: note: previous definition is here
> > static bool global_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
> > ^
> > 2 errors generated.
>
> Ugh yeah I didn't realize I am moving the definitions from within an
> #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG. I will just leave the definitions as-is and add a
> forward declaration before the definition of
> add_non_vmscan_reclaimed(), should also reduce the churn in the diff.
> Will wait for a bit before re-spinning to gather some feedback on the
> current version first.
I can also just move all the reclaim state functions
(set_task_reclaim_state(), report_freed_pages(),
add_non_vmscan_reclaimed()) below that #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG.
Might also name them more consistently.
>
> >
> >
> > vim +/cgroup_reclaim +549 mm/vmscan.c
> >
> > 86750830468506 Yang Shi 2021-05-04 548
> > b5ead35e7e1d34 Johannes Weiner 2019-11-30 @549 static bool cgroup_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
> > 89b5fae5368f6a Johannes Weiner 2012-01-12 550 {
> > b5ead35e7e1d34 Johannes Weiner 2019-11-30 551 return false;
> > 89b5fae5368f6a Johannes Weiner 2012-01-12 552 }
> > 97c9341f727105 Tejun Heo 2015-05-22 553
> > a579086c99ed70 Yu Zhao 2022-12-21 @554 static bool global_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
> > a579086c99ed70 Yu Zhao 2022-12-21 555 {
> > a579086c99ed70 Yu Zhao 2022-12-21 556 return true;
> > a579086c99ed70 Yu Zhao 2022-12-21 557 }
> > a579086c99ed70 Yu Zhao 2022-12-21 558
> >
> > --
> > 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
> > https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-28 17:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-28 8:50 [PATCH v1 0/2] Ignore " Yosry Ahmed
2023-02-28 8:50 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] mm: vmscan: refactor updating reclaimed pages in reclaim_state Yosry Ahmed
2023-02-28 8:51 ` Yosry Ahmed
2023-02-28 8:50 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] mm: vmscan: ignore non-LRU-based reclaim in memcg reclaim Yosry Ahmed
2023-02-28 11:45 ` kernel test robot
2023-02-28 11:55 ` kernel test robot
2023-02-28 17:18 ` Yosry Ahmed
2023-02-28 17:24 ` Yosry Ahmed [this message]
2023-03-08 6:54 ` [PATCH v1 0/2] Ignore " Yosry Ahmed
2023-03-08 16:00 ` Johannes Weiner
2023-03-08 18:01 ` Yosry Ahmed
2023-03-08 20:16 ` Johannes Weiner
2023-03-08 20:24 ` Yosry Ahmed
2023-03-08 21:25 ` Dave Chinner
2023-03-08 21:31 ` Yosry Ahmed
2023-03-09 4:08 ` Johannes Weiner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJD7tkZH-rJFQhfWNLbSoKhHzTQmLf0TaAJbL-XtvatbMeuVKQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=yosryahmed@google.com \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox