From: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
To: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: memcg: use rstat for non-hierarchical stats
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 19:20:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJD7tkZDpni+VM61i-jUgvn=TkZ5CySotTmUAFQPwMSjDfOEWQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZMCBzUH7qIdc3Y2X@P9FQF9L96D>
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 7:15 PM Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 12:29:04AM +0000, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> > Currently, memcg uses rstat to maintain hierarchical stats. Counters are
> > maintained for hierarchical stats at each memcg. Rstat tracks which
> > cgroups have updates on which cpus to keep those counters fresh on the
> > read-side.
> >
> > For non-hierarchical stats, we do not maintain counters. Instead, the
> global?
Do you mean "we do not maintain global counters"? I think "global" is
confusing, because it can be thought of as all cpus or as including
the subtree (as opposed to local for non-hierarchical stats).
> > percpu counters for a given stat need to be summed to get the
> > non-hierarchical stat value. The original implementation did the same.
> > At some point before rstat, non-hierarchical counters were introduced by
> > commit a983b5ebee57 ("mm: memcontrol: fix excessive complexity in
> > memory.stat reporting"). However, those counters were updated on the
> > performance critical write-side, which caused regressions, so they were
> > later removed by commit 815744d75152 ("mm: memcontrol: don't batch
> > updates of local VM stats and events"). See [1] for more detailed
> > history.
> >
> > Kernel versions in between a983b5ebee57 & 815744d75152 (a year and a
> > half) enjoyed cheap reads of non-hierarchical stats, specifically on
> > cgroup v1. When moving to more recent kernels, a performance regression
> > for reading non-hierarchical stats is observed.
> >
> > Now that we have rstat, we know exactly which percpu counters have
> > updates for each stat. We can maintain non-hierarchical counters again,
> > making reads much more efficient, without affecting the performance
> > critical write-side. Hence, add non-hierarchical (i.e local) counters
> > for the stats, and extend rstat flushing to keep those up-to-date.
> >
> > A caveat is that we now a stats flush before reading
> need?
Ah yes. I am hoping Andrew can amend this but I am happy to send a v3 as well.
> > local/non-hierarchical stats through {memcg/lruvec}_page_state_local()
> > or memcg_events_local(), where we previously only needed a flush to
> > read hierarchical stats. Most contexts reading non-hierarchical stats
> > are already doing a flush, add a flush to the only missing context in
> > count_shadow_nodes().
> >
> > With this patch, reading memory.stat from 1000 memcgs is 3x faster on a
> > machine with 256 cpus on cgroup v1:
> > # for i in $(seq 1000); do mkdir /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/cg$i; done
> > # time cat /dev/cgroup/memory/cg*/memory.stat > /dev/null
> > real 0m0.125s
> > user 0m0.005s
> > sys 0m0.120s
> >
> > After:
> > real 0m0.032s
> > user 0m0.005s
> > sys 0m0.027s
> >
> > [1]https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230725201811.GA1231514@cmpxchg.org/
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
> > Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
>
> Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Thanks!
>
> Thank you!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-26 2:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-26 0:29 [PATCH] " Yosry Ahmed
2023-07-26 0:29 ` [PATCH v2] " Yosry Ahmed
2023-07-26 0:36 ` Yosry Ahmed
2023-07-26 15:13 ` Johannes Weiner
2023-07-26 15:14 ` Yosry Ahmed
2023-07-26 2:15 ` Roman Gushchin
2023-07-26 2:20 ` Yosry Ahmed [this message]
2023-07-26 15:20 ` Johannes Weiner
2023-07-26 15:23 ` Yosry Ahmed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJD7tkZDpni+VM61i-jUgvn=TkZ5CySotTmUAFQPwMSjDfOEWQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=yosryahmed@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox