From: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
To: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] percpu: clean up all mappings when pcpu_map_pages() fails
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 13:08:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJD7tkYy=e_qkpu64y57o1cWs7RN7PwWgPoFamJu1YDjj_s=kw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240311194346.2291333-1-yosryahmed@google.com>
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 12:43 PM Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com> wrote:
>
> In pcpu_map_pages(), if __pcpu_map_pages() fails on a CPU, we call
> __pcpu_unmap_pages() to clean up mappings on all CPUs where mappings
> were created, but not on the CPU where __pcpu_map_pages() fails.
>
> __pcpu_map_pages() and __pcpu_unmap_pages() are wrappers around
> vmap_pages_range_noflush() and vunmap_range_noflush(). All other callers
> of vmap_pages_range_noflush() call vunmap_range_noflush() when mapping
> fails, except pcpu_map_pages(). The reason could be that partial
> mappings may be left behind from a failed mapping attempt.
>
> Call __pcpu_unmap_pages() for the failed CPU as well in
> pcpu_map_pages().
>
> This was found by code inspection, no failures or bugs were observed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Any thoughts about this change? Should I resend next week after the
merge window?
> ---
>
> Perhaps the reason __pcpu_unmap_pages() is not currently being called
> for the failed CPU is that the size and alignment requirements make sure
> we never leave any partial mappings behind? I have no idea. Nonetheless,
> I think we want this change as that could be fragile, and is
> inconsistent with other callers.
>
> ---
> mm/percpu-vm.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/percpu-vm.c b/mm/percpu-vm.c
> index 2054c9213c433..cd69caf6aa8d8 100644
> --- a/mm/percpu-vm.c
> +++ b/mm/percpu-vm.c
> @@ -231,10 +231,10 @@ static int pcpu_map_pages(struct pcpu_chunk *chunk,
> return 0;
> err:
> for_each_possible_cpu(tcpu) {
> - if (tcpu == cpu)
> - break;
> __pcpu_unmap_pages(pcpu_chunk_addr(chunk, tcpu, page_start),
> page_end - page_start);
> + if (tcpu == cpu)
> + break;
> }
> pcpu_post_unmap_tlb_flush(chunk, page_start, page_end);
> return err;
> --
> 2.44.0.278.ge034bb2e1d-goog
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-19 20:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-11 19:43 Yosry Ahmed
2024-03-19 20:08 ` Yosry Ahmed [this message]
2024-03-19 20:32 ` Dennis Zhou
2024-03-19 20:49 ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-03-21 16:57 ` Dennis Zhou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJD7tkYy=e_qkpu64y57o1cWs7RN7PwWgPoFamJu1YDjj_s=kw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=yosryahmed@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=dennis@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox