From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
To: linux@dominikbrodowski.net
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] random: split initialization into early step and later step
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 10:28:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHmME9oGkjAxvoBvWMBRSjFmKLzOdzfcQAB4q3P869BsySSfNg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YzKZnkwCi0UwY/4Q@owl.dominikbrodowski.net>
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 8:35 AM Dominik Brodowski
<linux@dominikbrodowski.net> wrote:
> > #if defined(LATENT_ENTROPY_PLUGIN)
> > static const u8 compiletime_seed[BLAKE2S_BLOCK_SIZE] __initconst __latent_entropy;
> > @@ -803,34 +798,46 @@ int __init random_init(const char *command_line)
> > i += longs;
> > continue;
> > }
> > - entropy[0] = random_get_entropy();
> > - _mix_pool_bytes(entropy, sizeof(*entropy));
> > arch_bits -= sizeof(*entropy) * 8;
> > ++i;
> > }
>
>
> Previously, random_get_entropy() was mixed into the pool ARRAY_SIZE(entropy)
> times.
>
> > +/*
> > + * This is called a little bit after the prior function, and now there is
> > + * access to timestamps counters. Interrupts are not yet enabled.
> > + */
> > +void __init random_init(void)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long entropy = random_get_entropy();
> > + ktime_t now = ktime_get_real();
> > +
> > + _mix_pool_bytes(utsname(), sizeof(*(utsname())));
>
> But now, it's only mixed into the pool once. Is this change on purpose?
Yea, it is. I don't think it's really doing much of use. Before we did
it because it was convenient -- because we simply could. But in
reality mostly what we care about is capturing when it gets to that
point in the execution. For jitter, the actual jitter function
(try_to_generate_entropy()) is better here.
However, before feeling too sad about it, remember that
extract_entropy() is still filling a block with rdtsc when rdrand
fails, the same way as this function was. So it's still in there
anyway.
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-27 8:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-26 21:31 Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-09-26 21:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] kfence: use better stack hash seed Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-09-27 6:35 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] random: split initialization into early step and later step Dominik Brodowski
2022-09-27 8:28 ` Jason A. Donenfeld [this message]
2022-09-27 8:30 ` Dominik Brodowski
2022-09-27 8:40 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAHmME9oGkjAxvoBvWMBRSjFmKLzOdzfcQAB4q3P869BsySSfNg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox