Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] minmax: Put all the clamp() definitions together

[Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Sun, 28 Jul 2024 at 15:14, David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com> wrote:
>
> Ok, but those can't be used as array sizes or constants.
> So the temporaries don't matter.

No, mut I don't want the insane size explosion from unnecessarily just
forcing it to use min()/max().

> Don't they just work with min() - if not where is the signednes mismatch?

David - this whole discussion is BECAUSE THESE THINGS ARE A TOTAL
DISASTER WHEN USED IN DEEP MACRO EXPANSION.

So no. It does not work - because core macros like HUGETLB_PAGE_ORDER
end up being used deep in the VM layer, and I don't want to see
another stupid multi-ten-kB line just because min() is such a pig.

End result: I'm going to make the rule be that when you do macro
definitions using constants, then "MIN()/MAX()" is preferable simply
because it avoids the insane expansion noise.

Then in normal *code* you should use min() and max(). But not for
things like macro "constants" even if those constants end up being
some computed thing.

          Linus