linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Cc: lkp@lists.01.org, lkp@intel.com,
	 Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [oliver.sang@intel.com: [cpumask] b9a7ecc71f: WARNING:at_include/linux/cpumask.h:#__is_kernel_percpu_address]
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2022 09:20:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wiK5wyj58x3uvt+otsO9=79N13OO6Nf57DFVYO=QX==ig@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YzeclACdH9JmaRza@yury-laptop>

On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 6:51 PM Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The commit  b9a7ecc71fe582e ("cpumask: fix checking valid cpu range")
> fixes broken cpumask_check(), which for now doesn't warn user when it
> should. After the fix, I observed many false-positive warnings which
> were addressed in the following patches.

Are all the false positives fixed?

I suspect that to avoid any automation noise, you should just rebase
so that the fixes come first. Otherwise we'll end up wasting a lot of
time on the noise.

This is not that different from introducing new buil;d-time warnings:
the things they point out need to be fixed before the warning can be
integrated, or it causes bisection problems.

                  Linus


  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-01 16:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-01  1:49 Yury Norov
2022-10-01 16:20 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2022-10-01 17:16   ` Yury Norov
2022-10-11 17:09     ` Andrew Jones
2022-10-11 17:16       ` Yury Norov
2022-10-11 17:21         ` Andrew Jones
2022-10-11 17:23         ` Yury Norov
2022-10-11 18:04           ` Andrew Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAHk-=wiK5wyj58x3uvt+otsO9=79N13OO6Nf57DFVYO=QX==ig@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
    --cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox